2015-08-16 06:54:43 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc::lint::*;
|
2015-09-03 14:42:17 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_front::hir::*;
|
2015-08-26 15:09:37 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc::middle::ty;
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-04 03:11:40 +00:00
|
|
|
use utils::{snippet, span_lint, is_adjusted};
|
2015-07-26 14:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[allow(missing_copy_implementations)]
|
|
|
|
pub struct EtaPass;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare_lint!(pub REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, Warn,
|
2015-08-13 08:32:35 +00:00
|
|
|
"using redundant closures, i.e. `|a| foo(a)` (which can be written as just `foo`)");
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl LintPass for EtaPass {
|
|
|
|
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
|
|
|
|
lint_array!(REDUNDANT_CLOSURE)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-09-19 02:53:04 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-19 02:53:04 +00:00
|
|
|
impl LateLintPass for EtaPass {
|
|
|
|
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) {
|
2015-08-21 18:44:48 +00:00
|
|
|
match expr.node {
|
|
|
|
ExprCall(_, ref args) |
|
|
|
|
ExprMethodCall(_, _, ref args) => {
|
2015-08-14 12:21:05 +00:00
|
|
|
for arg in args {
|
2015-08-25 12:41:35 +00:00
|
|
|
check_closure(cx, arg)
|
2015-08-14 12:21:05 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
_ => (),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-19 02:53:04 +00:00
|
|
|
fn check_closure(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) {
|
2015-08-14 12:21:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if let ExprClosure(_, ref decl, ref blk) = expr.node {
|
|
|
|
if !blk.stmts.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
// || {foo(); bar()}; can't be reduced here
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if let Some(ref ex) = blk.expr {
|
|
|
|
if let ExprCall(ref caller, ref args) = ex.node {
|
|
|
|
if args.len() != decl.inputs.len() {
|
|
|
|
// Not the same number of arguments, there
|
|
|
|
// is no way the closure is the same as the function
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-26 15:09:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if args.iter().any(|arg| is_adjusted(cx, arg)) {
|
|
|
|
// Are the arguments type-adjusted? Then we need the closure
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let fn_ty = cx.tcx.expr_ty(caller);
|
|
|
|
if let ty::TyBareFn(_, fn_ty) = fn_ty.sty {
|
|
|
|
// Is it an unsafe function? They don't implement the closure traits
|
|
|
|
if fn_ty.unsafety == Unsafety::Unsafe {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-14 12:21:05 +00:00
|
|
|
for (ref a1, ref a2) in decl.inputs.iter().zip(args) {
|
|
|
|
if let PatIdent(_, ident, _) = a1.pat.node {
|
|
|
|
// XXXManishearth Should I be checking the binding mode here?
|
|
|
|
if let ExprPath(None, ref p) = a2.node {
|
|
|
|
if p.segments.len() != 1 {
|
|
|
|
// If it's a proper path, it can't be a local variable
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p.segments[0].identifier != ident.node {
|
|
|
|
// The two idents should be the same
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-14 12:21:05 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-26 15:09:37 +00:00
|
|
|
span_lint(cx, REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, expr.span, &format!(
|
|
|
|
"redundant closure found. Consider using `{}` in its place",
|
|
|
|
snippet(cx, caller.span, "..")));
|
2015-05-10 05:09:04 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|