mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer
synced 2024-12-26 04:53:34 +00:00
51a0058d4c
3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg Additional feature for #3639 - [x] Add tests for paths with more segments - [x] Make generating the function in another file work - [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module - [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file - [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper 4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`. The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct. The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions. There are a few places which I am not quite sure: - Is the way I extract the macro names correct? - Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`? Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome! Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <ltentrup@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| .eslintrc.js | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .vscodeignore | ||
| icon.png | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| ra_syntax_tree.tmGrammar.json | ||
| README.md | ||
| rollup.config.js | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
rust-analyzer
Provides support for rust-analyzer: novel LSP server for the Rust programming language.
See https://rust-analyzer.github.io/ for more information.