Fix `-Zgcc-ld=lld`
`-Zgcc-ld=lld` is currently broken. CI is currently ignoring its tests.
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` on the `compiletest` change: I'm not sure which of `bootstrap`'s test step or `compiletest` is currently incorrect wrt windows' `--compile-lib-path`. Since `sysroot/bin` is passed on windows, that means that `compiletest` can't find `rust-lld` on windows and tests are currently ignored: it's looking for something that is in `sysroot/lib` instead.
They are currently ignored on unixes for a different reason: the lld wrapper has a different name than what is checked.
(I've changed `compiletest` in this PR, just because I could make a very targeted change there, whereas completely changing the intentional lib path that is passed seemed it'd have wider reaching implications on all tests.)
And in both unix/win cases, I've changed the detection to look for `rust-lld` rather than the wrappers in `bin/gcc-ld/`. It seems like the more stable of all these executable names.
r? `@petrochenkov`
I've tested the `lld-wrapper` change on linux and osx, but couldn't test on windows gnu targets (I only have MSVC targets, and these can't use `rust-lld` via `-Zgcc-ld=lld`, nor do they use the lld wrapper IIUC).
I'd expect it to work whether or not the wrapper is called with or without an executable suffix. But at least now CI should test it in these targets.
Fixes#101370.
Open a BCrypt algorithm handle
Fixes#101474, supplants #101456.
Replaces use of a pseduo handle with manually opening a algorithm handle.
Most interesting thing here is the atomics.
r? `@thomcc`
Use proc-macro-srv from sysroot in rust-project.json workspaces
This was discussed [on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/.60sysroot.60.20vs.20.60sysroot_src.60.20for.20.60rust-project.2Ejson.60.3F/near/293023920), basically in `rust-project.json` workspaces RA doesn't respect the `sysroot` setting when picking which `proc-macro-srv` to launch, and this causes abi mismatches in practice.
This is the simple fix that `@Veykril` suggested, and I've verified that it works on Fuchsia by inspecting the cmdline with `pgrep rust-analyzer | xargs ps -fp` to check that it's using the `proc-macro-srv` from our prebuilts which matches the `sysroot` specified in our `rust-project.json`.
Can this be merged as is, or do we need to add tests that exercise this?
Track PGO profiles in depinfo
This PR makes sure that PGO profiles (`-Cprofile-use` and `-Cprofile-sample-use`) are tracked in depinfo, so that when they change, the compilation session will be invalidated.
This approach was discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/246057-t-cargo/topic/Tracking.20PGO.20profile.20files.20in.20cargo).
I tried it locally and it seems that the code is recompiled just with this change, and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100413 is not even needed. But it's possible that not everything required is recompiled, so we will probably want to land both changes.
Another approach to implement this could be to store the PGO profiles in `sess.parse_sess.file_depinfo` when the session is being created, but then the paths would have to be converted to a string and then to a symbol, which seemed unnecessarily complicated.
CC `@michaelwoerister`
r? `@Eh2406`
fix: sort all bounds on trait object types
Fixes#13181#12793 allowed different ordering of trait bounds in trait object types but failed to account for the ordering of projection bounds. I opted for sorting all the bounds at once rather than splitting them into `SmallVec`s so it's easier to do the same thing for other bounds when we have them.
fix: Insert whitespaces into static & const bodies if they are expanded from macro on hover
Partially fixes#13143.
To resolve the other part we need to expand macros in unevaluated static & const bodies, and I'm not sure we want to. If for example it includes a call to `assert!()`, expanding it will lead to worse hover.
Make `ReentrantMutex` movable and `const`
As `MovableMutex` is now `const`, it can be used to simplify the implementation and interface of the internal reentrant mutex type. Consequently, the standard error stream does not need to be wrapped in `OnceLock` and `OnceLock::get_or_init_pin()` can be removed.
fix: correct broken logic for return complition
It seems that we've accidentally deleted the tests here couple of years
ago, and then fairly recently made a typo during refactor as well.
Reinstall tests, with coverage marks this time :-)
It seems that we've accidentally deleted the tests here couple of years
ago, and then fairly recently made a typo during refactor as well.
Reinstall tests, with coverage marks this time :-)
safe transmute: use `Assume` struct to provide analysis options
This task was left as a TODO in #92268; resolving it brings [`BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/mem/trait.BikeshedIntrinsicFrom.html) more in line with the API defined in [MCP411](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411).
**Before:**
```rust
pub unsafe trait BikeshedIntrinsicFrom<
Src,
Context,
const ASSUME_ALIGNMENT: bool,
const ASSUME_LIFETIMES: bool,
const ASSUME_VALIDITY: bool,
const ASSUME_VISIBILITY: bool,
> where
Src: ?Sized,
{}
```
**After:**
```rust
pub unsafe trait BikeshedIntrinsicFrom<Src, Context, const ASSUME: Assume = { Assume::NOTHING }>
where
Src: ?Sized,
{}
```
`Assume::visibility` has also been renamed to `Assume::safety`, as library safety invariants are what's actually being assumed; visibility is just the mechanism by which it is currently checked (and that may change).
r? `@oli-obk`
---
Related:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
Revert "Remove deferred sized checks"
cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100652#issuecomment-1225798572
I'm okay with reverting this for now, and I will look into the diagnostic regressions.
This reverts commit 33212bf7f527798a8cfa2bbb38781742f4ca718a.
r? `@pnkfelix`
----
EDIT: This _also_ fixes#101066, a regression in method selection logic/coercion(?) due to the early registering of a `Sized` bound.
Support `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit|sig_dfl"]` on `fn main()` to prevent ignoring `SIGPIPE`
When enabled, programs don't have to explicitly handle `ErrorKind::BrokenPipe` any longer. Currently, the program
```rust
fn main() { loop { println!("hello world"); } }
```
will print an error if used with a short-lived pipe, e.g.
% ./main | head -n 1
hello world
thread 'main' panicked at 'failed printing to stdout: Broken pipe (os error 32)', library/std/src/io/stdio.rs:1016:9
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
by enabling `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]` like this
```rust
#![feature(unix_sigpipe)]
#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
fn main() { loop { println!("hello world"); } }
```
there is no error, because `SIGPIPE` will not be ignored and thus the program will be killed appropriately:
% ./main | head -n 1
hello world
The current libstd behaviour of ignoring `SIGPIPE` before `fn main()` can be explicitly requested by using `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_ign"]`.
With `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]`, no change at all is made to `SIGPIPE`, which typically means the behaviour will be the same as `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62569 and referenced issues for discussions regarding the `SIGPIPE` problem itself
See the [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Proposal.3A.20First.20step.20towards.20solving.20the.20SIGPIPE.20problem) Zulip topic for more discussions, including about this PR.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
Lift out the module scope into a field in the Resolver
A Resolver *always* has a module scope at the end of its scope stack,
instead of encoding this as an invariant we can just lift this scope
out into a field, allowing us to skip going through the scope vec
indirection entirely.
A Resolver *always* has a module scope at the end of its scope stack,
instead of encoding this as an invariant we can just lift this scope
out into a field, allowing us to skip going through the scope vec
indirection entirely.
