Use a u64 for the rmeta root position
Waffle noticed this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117301#discussion_r1405410174
We've upgraded the other file offsets to u64, and this one only costs 4 bytes per file. Also the way the truncation was being done before was extremely easy to miss, I sure missed it! It's not clear to me if not having this change effectively made the other upgrades from u32 to u64 ineffective, but we can have it now.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
detects redundant imports that can be eliminated.
for #117772 :
In order to facilitate review and modification, split the checking code and
removing redundant imports code into two PR.
Add support for making lib features internal
We have the notion of an "internal" lang feature: a feature that is never intended to be stabilized, and using which can cause ICEs and other issues without that being considered a bug.
This extends that idea to lib features as well. It is an alternative to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115623: instead of using an attribute to declare lib features internal, we simply do this based on the name. Everything ending in `_internals` or `_internal` is considered internal.
Then we rename `core_intrinsics` to `core_intrinsics_internal`, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115597.
Implement completion for the callable fields.
Fixes#14656
PR is opened with basic changes. It could be improved by having a new `SymbolKind` for the callable fields and implementing a separate render function similar to the `render_method` for the new `SymbolKind`.
It could also be done without any changes to the `SymbolKind` of course, have the new function called based on the type of field.
I prefer the former method.
Please give any thoughts or changes you think is appropriate for this method. I could start working on that in this same PR.
chore: remove unused `PhantomData`
This PR removes an unused `PhantomData` in `FileItemTreeId`.
*Note:* I am not sure how this should be implemented, maybe as a type instead of a wrapper struct? I'd be happy to do so if needed 👍
This commit addresses the issue of excessive and unrelated errors
generated by top-level `let` statements. Now, only a single error is
produced, indicating that `let` statements are invalid at the top level.
internal: simplify the removal of dulicate workspaces.
### Summary:
Refactoring the duplicate removal process for `workspaces` in `fetch_workspaces`.
### Changes Made:
Replaced `[].iter().enumerate().skip(...).filter_map(...)` with a more concise `[i+1..].positions(...)` provided by `itertools`, which enhances clarity without changing functionality
### Impact:
This change aims to enhance the duplicate removal process for `workspaces`. This change has been tested on my machine.
Please review and provide feedback. Thanks!
fix: Dedup duplicate crates with differing origins in CrateGraph construction
Partially fixes#15656 . Until now the condition for deduplication in crate graphs were the strict equality of two crates. One problem that arises from this is that in certain conditions when we see the same crate having different `CrateOrigin`s the first occurrence would be kept. This approach however results in some unwanted results such as making renaming forbidden as this has been recently only made available for local crates. The given example in #15656 can still not be resolved with this PR as that involves taking inconsistencies between dependencies into consideration. This will be addressed in a future PR.
Make data reflect a case where dev deps are existent.
base-db::CrateGraph::extend now adds dev dependencies for a crate
in case of its upgrading from a CrateOrigin::Lib kind of a crate to a
CrateOrigin::Local one.
Partially fixes#15656 . When a crate graph is extended which is the case when new workspaces are added to the project
the rules for deduplication were too strict. One problem that arises from this is that in certain conditions
when we see the same crate having different `CrateOrigin`s the first form would be maintained. This approach however
results in some unwanted results such as making renaming forbidden as this has been recently only made available for
local crates. The given example in #15656 can still not be resolved with this PR as that involves taking inconsistencies
between dependencies into consideration. This will be addressed in a future PR.
