3047: Update async unsafe fn ordering in parser r=matklad a=kiljacken
As of rust-lang/rust#61319 the correct order for functions that are both unsafe and async is: `async unsafe fn` and not `unsafe async fn`.
This commit updates the parser tests to reflect this, and corrects parsing behavior to accept the correct ordering.
Fixes#3025
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
3040: Rework value parameter parsing r=matklad a=tobz1000
Fixes#2847.
- `Fn__(...)` parameters with idents/patterns no longer parse
- Trait function parameters with arbitrary patterns parse
- Trait function parameters without idents/patterns no longer parse
- `fn(...)` parameters no longer parse with patterns other than a single ident
__Question__: The pre-existing test `param_list_opt_patterns` has been kept as-is, although the name no longer makes sense (it's testing `Fn__(...)` params, which aren't allowed patterns any more). What would be best to do about this?
Co-authored-by: Toby Dimmick <tobydimmick@pm.me>
As of rust-lang/rust#61319 the correct order for functions that are both
unsafe and async is: `async unsafe fn` and not `unsafe async fn`.
This commit updates the parser tests to reflect this, and corrects
parsing behavior to accept the correct ordering.
Fixes#3025
- `Fn__(...)` parameters with idents/patterns no longer parse
- Trait function parameters with arbitrary patterns parse
- Trait function parameters without idents/patterns no longer parse
- `fn(...)` parameters no longer parse with patterns other than a single ident
This intention is pretty slow for `impl Interator`, because it has a
ton of default methods which need to be substituted.
The proper fix here is to not compute the actual edit until the user
triggers the action, but that's awkward to do in the LSP right now, so
let's just put a profiling code for now.
2962: Differentiate underscore alias from named aliases r=matklad a=zombiefungus
pre for Fixing Issue 2736
edited to avoid autoclosing the issue
Co-authored-by: zombiefungus <divmermarlav@gmail.com>
2959: Rework how we send diagnostics to client r=matklad a=kiljacken
The previous way of sending from the thread pool suffered from stale diagnostics due to being canceled before we could clear the old ones.
The key change is moving to sending diagnostics from the main loop thread, but doing all the hard work in the thread pool. This should provide the best of both worlds, with little to no of the downsides.
This should hopefully fix a lot of issues, but we'll need testing in each individual issue to be sure.
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
The previous way of sending from the thread pool suffered from stale
diagnostics due to being canceled before we could clear the old ones.
The key change is moving to sending diagnostics from the main loop
thread, but doing all the hard work in the thread pool. This should
provide the best of both worlds, with little to no of the downsides.
This should hopefully fix a lot of issues, but we'll need testing in
each individual issue to be sure.
The extra allocation for message should not matter here at all, but
using a static string is just as ergonomic, if not more, and there's
no reason to write deliberately slow code
