Further tuning of the Gentoo installation instructions.
Based on feedback from the Gentoo repository maintainer, addition of the possibility to install rust-analyzer via rustup.
Reorder check_item_type diagnostics so they occur next to the corresponding `check_well_formed` diagnostics
The first commit is just a cleanup.
The second commit moves most checks from `check_mod_item_types` into `check_well_formed`, invoking the checks in lockstep per-item instead of iterating over all items twice.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118521 (Enable address sanitizer for MSVC targets using INFERASANLIBS linker flag)
- #119026 (std::net::bind using -1 for openbsd which in turn sets it to somaxconn.)
- #119195 (Make named_asm_labels lint not trigger on unicode and trigger on format args)
- #119204 (macro_rules: Less hacky heuristic for using `tt` metavariable spans)
- #119362 (Make `derive(Trait)` suggestion more accurate)
- #119397 (Recover parentheses in range patterns)
- #119417 (Uplift some miscellaneous coroutine-specific machinery into `check_closure`)
- #119539 (Fix typos)
- #119540 (Don't synthesize host effect args inside trait object types)
- #119555 (Add codegen test for RVO on MaybeUninit)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
internal: Move query limits to the caller
Prior we calculated up to `limit` entries from a query, then filtered from that leaving us with less entries than the limit in some cases (which might give odd completion behavior due to items disappearing). This changes it so we filter before checking the limit.
Give a userful error when rustc cannot be found in explicit sysroot
Somehow r-a believed that my sysroot was something weird with no rustc. Probably a me issue, but it was impossible to diagnose since r-a just gave me a plain "No such file or directory". Adding this error makes it clear what happened and allows diagnosing the problem.
internal: Switch to `expected.assert_eq` for `ide` tests
This PR switches from `assert_debug_eq` to `assert_eq` and only compares parts of the result and not the whole. The aim is to only compare parts which are relevant to the test and also make it more readable.
Part of #14268.
## Questions
- [x] Can I use `Vec`? If not, what is the alternative?
I assume I cannot because of: c3a00b5468/docs/dev/architecture.md (L413)
- [x] Should I group it by file, as proposed by Lukas?
```
file_id 1:
source_file_edits:
- Indel { insert: "foo2", delete: 4..7 }
file_id 2:
file_system_edits:
MoveFile AnchoredPathBuf { anchor: FileId(2), path: "foo2.rs", }
```
- [x] Is it okay to ignore `CreateFile` events? They do not have a FileId, which would be problematic, but they do not occur in the existing tests, so I marked them as `unreachable!()` so far.
