Update windows ffi bindings
Bump `windows-bindgen` to version 0.51.1. This brings with it some changes to the generated FFI bindings, but little that affects the code.
One change that does have more of an impact is `SOCKET` being `usize` instead of either `u64` or `u32` (as is used in std's public `SOCKET` type). However, it's now easy enough to abstract over that difference.
Finally I added a few new bindings that are likely to be used in pending PRs, mostly to make sure they're ok with the new metadata.
r? libs
Convert `Into<ExitStatus> for ExitStatusError` to `From<ExitStatusError> for ExitStatus` in `std::process`
Implementing suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84908#issuecomment-912352902:
> I believe the impl on ExitStatusError should be
>
> ```rust
> impl From<ExitStatusError> for ExitStatus
> ```
>
> rather than
>
> ```rust
> impl Into<ExitStatus> for ExitStatusError
> ```
>
> (there is generally never anything implemented as `Into` first, because implementing `From` reflexively provides `Into`)
Allocate ast ids for parameters
Since these can have attributes attached to them, we'll need this sooner or later (sooner being me tinkering with the token map right now)
Implement From<OwnedFd/Handle> for ChildStdin/out/err object
## Summary
Comments in `library/std/src/process.rs` ( ab08639e59 ) indicates that `ChildStdin`, `ChildStdout`, `ChildStderr` implements some traits that are not actually implemented: `FromRawFd`, `FromRawHandle`, and the `From<OwnedFd>/From<OwnedHandle>` from the io_safety feature.
In this PR I implement `FromRawHandle` and `FromRawFd` for those 3 objects.
## Usecase
I have a usecase where those implementations are basically needed. I want to customize
in the `Command::spawn` API how the pipes for the parent/child communications are created (mainly to strengthen the security attributes on them). I can properly setup the pipes,
and the "child" handles can be provided to `Child::spawn` easily using `Stdio::from_raw_handle`. However, there is no way to generate the `ChildStd*` objects from the raw handle of the created name pipe, which would be very useful to still expose the same API
than in other OS (basically a `spawn(...) -> (Child, ChildStdin, ChildStdout, ChildSterr)`, where on windows this is customized), and to for example use `tokio::ChildStdin::from_std` afterwards.
## Questions
* Are those impls OK to add? I have searched to see if those impls were missing on purpose, or if it was just never implemented because never needed. I haven't found any indication on why they couldn't be added, although the user clearly has to be very careful that the handle provided makes sense (i think, mainly that it is in overlapped mode for windows).
* If this change is ok, adding the impls for the io_safety feature would probably be best, or should it be done in another PR?
* I just copy-pasted the `#[stable(...)]` attributes, but the `since` value has to be updated, I'm not sure to which value.
Implement `From<{&,&mut} [T; N]>` for `Vec<T>` where `T: Clone`
Currently, if `T` implements `Clone`, we can create a `Vec<T>` from an `&[T]` or an `&mut [T]`, can we also support creating a `Vec<T>` from an `&[T; N]` or an `&mut [T; N]`? Also, do I need to add `#[inline]` to the implementation?
ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#220. [Accepted]
Closes#100880.
Amend style guide section for formatting where clauses in type aliases
This PR has two parts:
1. Amend wording about breaking before or after the `=`, which is a style guide bugfix to align it with current rustfmt behavior.
2. Explain how to format trailing (#89122) where clauses, which are preferred in both GATs (#90076) and type aliases (#114662).
r? `@joshtriplett`
fix: panic with wrapping/unwrapping result return type assists
With the `wrap_return_type_in_result` assist, the following code results in a panic (note the lack of a semicolon):
```rust
fn foo(num: i32) -> $0i32 {
return num
}
=>
thread 'handlers::wrap_return_type_in_result::tests::wrap_return_in_tail_position' panicked at crates/syntax/src/ted.rs:137:41:
called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value
```
I think this is because it first walks the body expression to change any `return` expressions and then walks all tail expressions, resulting in the `return num` being changed twice since it is both a `return` and in tail position. This can also happen when a `match` is in tail position and `return` is used in a branch for example. Not really sure how big of an issue this is in practice though since this seems to be the only case that is impacted and can be reduced to just `num` instead of `return num`.
This also occurs with the `unwrap_result_return_type` assist but panics with the following instead:
```
thread 'handlers::unwrap_result_return_type::tests::wrap_return_in_tail_position' panicked at /rustc/3223b0b5e8dadda3f76c3fd1a8d6c5addc09599e/library/alloc/src/string.rs:1766:29:
assertion failed: self.is_char_boundary(n)
```
minor: hover_simple refactor
A minor refactor of `hover_simple` opportunity I noticed while skimming through the code.
- `if let`s -> `match`
- `iter::once(x).cycle` -> `iter::repeat`
- `classify_token` -> `classify_node`
Raise minimum supported Apple OS versions
This implements the proposal to raise the minimum supported Apple OS versions as laid out in the now-completed MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/556).
As of this PR, rustc and the stdlib now support these versions as the baseline:
- macOS: 10.12 Sierra
- iOS: 10
- tvOS: 10
- watchOS: 5 (Unchanged)
In addition to everything this breaks indirectly, these changes also erase the `armv7-apple-ios` target (currently tier 3) because the oldest supported iOS device now uses ARMv7s. Not sure what the policy around tier3 target removal is but shimming it is not an option due to the linker refusing.
[Per comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/556#issuecomment-1297175073), this requires a FCP to merge. cc `@wesleywiser.`
[breaking change] Validate crate name in `--extern` [MCP 650]
Reject non-ASCII-identifier crate names passed to the CLI option `--extern` (`rustc`, `rustdoc`).
Implements [MCP 650](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/650) (except that we only allow ASCII identifiers not arbitrary Rust identifiers).
Fixes#113035.
[As mentioned on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/Disallow.20non-identifier-valid.20--extern.20cr.E2.80.A6.20compiler-team.23650/near/376826988), doing a crater run probably doesn't make sense since it wouldn't yield anything. Most users don't interact with `rustc` directly but only ever through Cargo which always passes a valid crate name to `--extern` when it invokes `rustc` and `rustdoc`. In any case, the user wouldn't be able to use such a crate name in the source code anyway.
Note that I'm not using [`rustc_session::output::validate_crate_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_session/output/fn.validate_crate_name.html) (used for `--crate-name` and `#![crate_name]`) since the latter doesn't reject non-ASCII crate names and ones that start with a digit.
As an aside, I've also thought about getting rid of `validate_crate_name` entirely in a separate PR (with another MCP) in favor of `is_ascii_ident` to reject more weird `--crate-name`s, `#![crate_name]`s and file names but I think that would lead to a lot of actual breakage, namely because of file names starting with a digit. In `tests/ui` 9 tests would be impacted for example.
CC `@estebank`
r? `@est31`
extend check.overrideCommand and buildScripts.overrideCommand docs
Extend check.overrideCommand and buildScripts.overrideCommand docs regarding invocation strategy and location.
However something still seems a bit odd -- the docs for `invocationStrategy`/`invocationLocation` talk about "workspaces", but the setting that controls which workspaces are considered is called `linkedProjects`. Is a project the same as a workspace here or is there some subtle difference?
minor : Deunwrap convert_comment_block and desugar_doc_comment
Closes subtask 13 of #15398 . I still don't know a more idiomatic way for the for loops I added, any suggestion would make me happy.
Although it doesn't panic now, further changes to how we recover from incomplete syntax
may cause this assist to panic. To mitigate this a test case has been added.
