rustc_log: provide a way to init logging based on the values, not names, of the env vars
Miri wants to affect how rustc does logging. So far this required setting environment variables before calling `rustc_driver::init_rustc_env_logger`. However, `set_var` is a function one should really [avoid calling](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90308), so this adds the necessary APIs to rustc such that Miri can just pass it the *values* of all the log-relevant environment variables, rather than having to change the global environment.
Add richer structure for Stable MIR Projections
Resolves https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/49.
Projections in Stable MIR are currently just strings. This PR replaces that representation with a richer structure, namely projections become vectors of `ProjectionElem`s, just as in MIR. The `ProjectionElem` enum is heavily based off of the MIR `ProjectionElem`.
This PR is a draft since there are several outstanding issues to resolve, including:
- How should `UserTypeProjection`s be represented in Stable MIR? In MIR, the projections are just a vector of `ProjectionElem<(),()>`, meaning `ProjectionElem`s that don't have Local or Type arguments (for `Index`, `Field`, etc. objects). Should `UserTypeProjection`s be represented this way in Stable MIR as well? Or is there a more user-friendly representation that wouldn't drag along all the `ProjectionElem` variants that presumably can't appear?
- What is the expected behavior of a `Place`'s `ty` function? Should it resolve down the chain of projections so that something like `*_1.f` would return the type referenced by field `f`?
- Tests should be added for `UserTypeProjection`
minor: Allow multiple snippet edits in a `TextDocumentEdit`
Explicitly[^1] allow a single `TextDocumentEdit` to have multiple `SnippetTextEdit`s. This allows things like renaming extracted variables and functions without having to go through a separate rename step. For an example of what this looks like, see the video in [this comment](https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/145374#issuecomment-1177341711).
The behavior described here lines up with [what VSCode does](bdc113ffe1/src/vscode-dts/vscode.d.ts (L3728-L3731)), and presumably what the eventual LSP behavior will be.
[^1]: This was technically the case before #15269, a single `TextDocumentEdit` always had multiple edits which were `InsertTextFormat.Snippet` as all of the edits were marked as being snippets, even if there weren't any tab stops or placeholders.
minor: Make "Expand macro" command title more explicit
Closes [#15856](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/15856).
I opted for "caret", since it's the better term (cursor is the mouse), but I'm not sure how popular it is these days.
Deny more `~const` trait bounds
thereby fixing a family of ICEs (delayed bugs) for `feature(const_trait_impl, effects)` code.
As discussed
r? `@fee1-dead`
Due to the way the current tree mutation api works, we need to collect
changes before we can apply them to the real syntax tree, and also can only
switch to a file once.
`destructure_tuple_binding_in_sub_pattern` also gets migrated even
though can't be used.
Add `std:#️⃣:{DefaultHasher, RandomState}` exports (needs FCP)
This implements rust-lang/libs-team#267 to move the libstd hasher types to `std::hash` where they belong, instead of `std::collections::hash_map`.
<details><summary>The below no longer applies, but is kept for clarity.</summary>
This is a small refactor for #27242, which moves the definitions of `RandomState` and `DefaultHasher` into `std::hash`, but in a way that won't be noticed in the public API.
I've opened rust-lang/libs-team#267 as a formal ACP to move these directly into the root of `std::hash`, but for now, they're at least separated out from the collections code in a way that will make moving that around easier.
I decided to simply copy the rustdoc for `std::hash` from `core::hash` since I think it would be ideal for the two to diverge longer-term, especially if the ACP is accepted. However, I would be willing to factor them out into a common markdown document if that's preferred.
</details>
