update: add editor/extension information to bug report template
When attempting to reproduce issues, I encounter difficulties due to differences in versions of LSP clients and editors (such as #16985, #16867, and more)
This sometimes consumes a lot of efforts from contributors to communicate the details about LSP client information. Therefore, I believe adding editor/extension information to the issue template would be helpful for problem reproduction.
Refactor the way bootstrap invokes `cargo miri`
Instead of basically doing `cargo run --manifest-path=<cargo-miri's manifest> -- miri`, let's invoke the `cargo-miri` binary directly. That means less indirections, and also makes it easier to e.g. run the libcore test suite in Miri. (But there are still other issues with that.)
Also also adjusted Miri's stage numbering so that it is consistent with rustc/rustdoc.
This also makes `./x.py test miri` honor `--no-doc`.
And this fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123177 by moving where we handle parallel_compiler.
Use the `Align` type when parsing alignment attributes
Use the `Align` type in `rustc_attr::parse_alignment`, removing the need to call `Align::from_bytes(...).unwrap()` later in the compilation process.
Stabilize `unchecked_{add,sub,mul}`
Tracking issue: #85122
I think we might as well just stabilize these basic three. They're the ones that have `nuw`/`nsw` flags in LLVM.
Notably, this doesn't include the potentially-more-complex or -more-situational things like `unchecked_neg` or `unchecked_shr` that are under different feature flags.
To quote Ralf https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85122#issuecomment-1681669646,
> Are there any objections to stabilizing at least `unchecked_{add,sub,mul}`? For those there shouldn't be any surprises about what their safety requirements are.
*Semantially* these are [already available on stable, even in `const`, via](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=bdb1ff889b61950897f1e9f56d0c9a36) `checked_*`+`unreachable_unchecked`. So IMHO we might as well just let people write them directly, rather than try to go through a `let Some(x) = x.checked_add(y) else { unsafe { hint::unreachable_unchecked() }};` dance.
I added additional text to each method to attempt to better describe the behaviour and encourage `wrapping_*` instead.
r? rust-lang/libs-api
Previously, items for `cargo test` and `cargo check` would appear as in
the `Select Runnable` quick pick that appears when running
`rust-analyzer: Run`, but `run` would only appear as a runnable if a
`main`` function was selected in the editor. This change adds `cargo
run` as an always available runnable command for binary packages.
This makes it easier to develop cli / tui applications, as now users can
run application from anywhere in their codebase.
fix: use lldb when debugging with C++ extension on MacOS
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/16901#issuecomment-2024486941
This PR resolves the issue of being unable to debug using the C++ extension on macOS. By using special configurations for the `MIMode` on macOS, it enables the C++ extension to connect to lldb when debugging (without affecting other platforms).
fix: lifetime length are not added in count of params in highlight
I found these two instances easily but I wonder how many such instances are there.
Fixes#16958
Revert to the crates.io version of rustc_pattern_analysis
The API hasn't fully settled yet, and there's an extra wrinkle with `IdxContainer` which blocked the [subtree update](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122981). Let's just keep using the crates.io version for a bit longer.
r? `@lnicola`
