5116: Categorize assists r=matklad a=kjeremy
Categorize assists so that editors can use them. Follows the LSP spec pretty close (and some things may need adjustments) but this populates the Refactor menu in vscode and pushes quickfixes through again.
This is a prerequisite to filtering out assists that the client doesn't care about.
Fixes#4147
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <kjeremy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
5089: Disable auto-complete on comments r=matklad a=BGluth
Resolves#4907 by disabling any auto-completion on comments.
As flodiebold [pointed out](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4907#issuecomment-648439979), in the future we may want to support some form of auto-completion within doc comments, but for now it was suggested to just disable auto-completion on them entirely.
The implementation involves adding a new field `is_comment` to `CompletionContext` and checking if the immediate token we auto-completed on is a comment. I couldn't see a case where we need to check any of the ancestors, but let me know if this is not sufficient. I also wasn't sure if it was necessary to add a new field to this struct, but I decided it's probably the best option if we want to potentially do auto-completion on doc comments in the future.
Finally, the three tests I added should I think ideally not filter results by `CompletionKind::Keyword`, but if I want to get unfiltered results, I need access to a non-public function [get_all_completion_items](9a4d02faf9/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/test_utils.rs (L32-L39)) which I don't know if I should make public just for this.
5161: SSR: Add initial support for placeholder constraints r=matklad a=davidlattimore
5184: Always install required nightly extension if current one is not nightly r=matklad a=Veetaha
This is weird, but having switched back to stable by uninstalling the extension appears that vscode doesn't destroy the `PersistentState` and thus changing to `nightly` channel doesn't work because the last check for nightly extension was less than 1 hour ago. The simple solution is to skip this check if we know that the current extension version is not nightly.
5185: Force showing extension activation error pop-up notification r=matklad a=Veetaha
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5091
5186: fix: correct pd/ppd/tfn/tmod completion doc r=matklad a=fannheyward
a33eefa3b2/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_snippet.rs (L23-L24)
Co-authored-by: BGluth <gluthb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Heyward Fann <fannheyward@gmail.com>
5175: More memory-efficient impl collection r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This saves roughly 90 MB in `ImplsFromDepsQuery`, which used to copy the list of all impls from libcore into *every* crate in the graph. It also stops collecting inherent impls from dependencies entirely, as those can only be located within the crate defining the self type.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
This makes the intention of inherent vs. trait impls somewhat more
clear and also fixes (?) an issue where trait impls with an unresolved
trait were added as inherent impls instead (hence the test changes).
5101: Add expect -- a light-weight alternative to insta r=matklad a=matklad
This PR implements a small snapshot-testing library. Snapshot updating is done by setting an env var, or by using editor feature (which runs a test with env-var set).
Here's workflow for updating a failing test:
Here's workflow for adding a new test:
Note that colorized diffs are not implemented in this PR, but should be easy to add (we already use them in test_utils).
Main differences from insta (which is essential for rust-analyzer development, thanks @mitsuhiko!):
* self-updating tests, no need for a separate tool
* fewer features (only inline snapshots, no redactions)
* fewer deps (no yaml, no persistence)
* tighter integration with editor
* first-class snapshot object, which can be used to write test functions (as opposed to testing macros)
* trivial to tweak for rust-analyzer needs, by virtue of being a workspace member.
I think eventually we should converge to a single snapshot testing library, but I am not sure that `expect` is exactly right, so I suggest rolling with both insta and expect for some time (if folks agree that expect might be better in the first place!).
# Editor Integration Implementation
The thing I am most excited about is the ability to update a specific snapshot from the editor. I want this to be available to other snapshot-testing libraries (cc @mitsuhiko, @aaronabramov), so I want to document how this works.
The ideal UI here would be a code action (💡). Unfortunately, it seems like it is impossible to implement without some kind of persistence (if you save test failures into some kind of a database, like insta does, than you can read the database from the editor plugin). Note that it is possible to highlight error by outputing error message in rustc's format. Unfortunately, one can't use the same trick to implement a quick fix.
For this reason, expect makes use of another rust-analyzer feature -- ability to run a single test at the cursor position. This does need some expect-specific code in rust-analyzer unfortunately. Specifically, if rust-analyzer notices that the cursor is on `expect!` macro, it adds a special flag to runnable's JSON. However, given #5017 it is possible to approximate this well-enough without rust-analyzer integration. Specifically, an extension can register a special runner which checks (using regexes) if rust-anlyzer runnable covers text with specific macro invocation and do special magic in that case.
closes#3835
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
4940: Add support for marking doctest items as distinct from normal code r=ltentrup a=Nashenas88
This adds `HighlightTag::Generic | HighlightModifier::Injected` as the default highlight for all elements within a doctest. Please feel free to suggest that a new tag be created or a different one used.
Fixes#4929Fixes#4939
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <Nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
5002: Fix underflow panic when doctests are at top of file r=Nashenas88 a=Nashenas88
While debugging a comment at the top of a test string, I discovered that the offset calculations could underflow and panic. This only seemed to occur in tests, I assume because it's running a debug mode. The wrapping is quickly fixed later on in release mode, which is why this seems to have gone unnoticed. The new checks ensure the value is always positive or zero.
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
4999: SSR: Allow matching of whole macro calls r=matklad a=davidlattimore
Matching within macro calls is to come later and matching of macro calls within macro calls later still.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
5000: Remove RelativePathBuf from fixture r=matklad a=matklad
The paths in fixture are not really relative (the default one is
`/main.rs`), so it doesn't make sense to use `RelativePathBuf` here.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
4900: Self variant enum res fix r=BGluth a=BGluth
Fixes#4789.
This is my first PR for this project, so it's probably worth giving it an extra close look.
A few things that I wasn't sure about:
- Is `resolve_path` really the best place to perform this check? It seemed like a natural place, but perhaps there's a better place?
- When handling the new variant `PathResolution::VariantDef`, I couldn't see an obvious variant of `TypeNs` to return in `in_type_ns` for Unions and Structs.
Co-authored-by: BGluth <gluthb@gmail.com>
4921: Allow SSR to match type references, items, paths and patterns r=davidlattimore a=davidlattimore
Part of #3186
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
4851: Add quickfix to add a struct field r=TimoFreiberg a=TimoFreiberg
Related to #4563
I created a quickfix for record literals first because the NoSuchField diagnostic was already there.
To offer that quickfix for FieldExprs with unknown fields I'd need to add a new diagnostic (or create a `NoSuchField` diagnostic for those cases)
I think it'd make sense to make this a snippet completion (to select the generated type), but this would require changing the `Analysis` API and I'd like some feedback before I touch that.
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
4903: Add highlighting support for doc comments r=matklad a=Nashenas88
The language server protocol includes a semantic modifier for documentation. This change exports that modifier for doc comments so users can choose to highlight them differently compared to regular comments.
Example:
<img width="375" alt="Screen Shot 2020-06-16 at 10 34 14 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1673130/84788271-f6599580-afbc-11ea-96e5-7a0215da620b.png">
CC @woody77
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <Nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
We might as well handle them internally, via queries.
I am not sure, but it looks like the current LibraryData setup might
even predate salsa? It's not really needed and creates a bunch of
complexity.
