440: Implement type inference for boolean operators r=flodiebold a=marcusklaas
Tried implementing the easiest part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/390. Hope this is somewhat close to what the intent of the issue was. Found it surprisingly easy to find my way around the repository - it's well organized!
Very grateful for any pointers.
Co-authored-by: Marcus Klaas de Vries <mail@marcusklaas.nl>
This was a bit complicated. I've added a wrapper type for now that does the
LocalSyntaxPtr <-> ExprId translation; we might want to get rid of that or give
it a nicer interface.
Since we need to be able to go from def to containing impl block, as well as the
other direction, and to find all impls for a certain type, a design similar to
the one for modules, where we collect all impls for the whole crate and keep
them in an arena, seemed fitting. The ImplBlock type, which provides the public
interface, then consists only of an Arc to the arena containing all impls, and
the index into it.
343: Bump arrayvec from 0.4.9 to 0.4.10 r=matklad a=dependabot[bot]
Bumps [arrayvec](https://github.com/bluss/arrayvec) from 0.4.9 to 0.4.10.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
- [`21661fa`](21661facf8) 0.4.10
- [`06930d2`](06930d27ce) FIX: Remove unused Copy/Clone for MaybeUninit
- [`85d9a06`](85d9a06a62) FIX: Use repr(C) MaybeUninit after discussion with RalfJung
- See full diff in [compare view](https://github.com/bluss/arrayvec/compare/0.4.9...0.4.10)
</details>
<br />
[](https://dependabot.com/compatibility-score.html?dependency-name=arrayvec&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=0.4.9&new-version=0.4.10)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
**Note:** This repo was added to Dependabot recently, so you'll receive a maximum of 5 PRs for your first few update runs. Once an update run creates fewer than 5 PRs we'll remove that limit.
You can always request more updates by clicking `Bump now` in your [Dependabot dashboard](https://app.dependabot.com).
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot badge me` will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme
Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot [dashboard](https://app.dependabot.com):
- Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
- Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies)
- Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
- Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
- Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)
Finally, you can contact us by mentioning @dependabot.
</details>
344: Bump itertools from 0.7.11 to 0.8.0 r=matklad a=dependabot[bot]
Bumps [itertools](https://github.com/bluss/rust-itertools) from 0.7.11 to 0.8.0.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
- [`cd0602a`](cd0602addc) 0.8.0
- [`5a8f2fd`](5a8f2fd5ed) MAINT: Require Rust 1.24 as minimum version
- [`4986d92`](4986d92d7f) DOC: Minor edits to module docs
- [`01f15a0`](01f15a0910) Merge [#288](https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bluss/rust-itertools/issues/288)
- [`883d40a`](883d40a6ef) map_into method
- [`3bf265d`](3bf265d5b7) Merge pull request [#321](https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bluss/rust-itertools/issues/321) from JohnHeitmann/master
- [`e820996`](e820996f64) Document the trait extension behavior of Itertools a bit more clearly
- [`44c9654`](44c9654fdb) Merge pull request [#318](https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bluss/rust-itertools/issues/318) from bluss/std-deprecations
- [`d2e254f`](d2e254f22f) API: Fix the mystery deprecation message for Step
- [`602f2f6`](602f2f675e) API: Deprecate .foreach() in favour of std's .for_each()
- Additional commits viewable in [compare view](https://github.com/bluss/rust-itertools/compare/0.7.11...0.8.0)
</details>
<br />
[](https://dependabot.com/compatibility-score.html?dependency-name=itertools&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=0.7.11&new-version=0.8.0)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
**Note:** This repo was added to Dependabot recently, so you'll receive a maximum of 5 PRs for your first few update runs. Once an update run creates fewer than 5 PRs we'll remove that limit.
You can always request more updates by clicking `Bump now` in your [Dependabot dashboard](https://app.dependabot.com).
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot badge me` will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme
Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot [dashboard](https://app.dependabot.com):
- Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
- Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies)
- Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
- Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
- Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)
Finally, you can contact us by mentioning @dependabot.
</details>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
We need to be able to get the receiver even if there is no field name yet, and
currently "a." wouldn't get parsed as a field name at all. This seems to help.
This improving this code is not a good use of people-time, and this
might be the most performant approach nonwithstanding
an api for this use case being added to walkdir
The cast expression expected any type via types::type_() function,
but the language spec does only allow TypeNoBounds (types without direct extra bounds
via `+`).
**Example:**
```rust
fn test() {
6i8 as i32 + 5;
}
```
This fails, because the types::type_() function which should parse the type after the
as keyword is greedy, and takes all plus sign after path types as extra.
My proposed fix is to replace the not implemented `type_no_plus()` just calls (`type_()`)
function, which is used at several places. The replacement is `type_with_bounds_cond(p: &mut Parser, allow_bounds: bool)`, which passes the condition to relevant sub-parsers.
This function is then called by `type_()` and the new public `type_no_bounds()`.
256: Improve/add use_item documentation r=matklad a=DJMcNab
Adds some documentation to use_item explaining all code paths (use imports are hard, especially with the ongoing discussion of anchored v. uniform paths - see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55618 for what appears to be the latest developments)
Co-authored-by: DJMcNab <36049421+djmcnab@users.noreply.github.com>
207: Finish implementing char validation r=aochagavia a=aochagavia
The only thing missing right now are good integration tests (and maybe more descriptive error messages)
Co-authored-by: Adolfo Ochagavía <github@adolfo.ochagavia.xyz>
127: Improve folding r=matklad a=aochagavia
I was messing around with adding support for multiline comments in folding and ended up changing a bunch of other things.
First of all, I am not convinced of folding groups of successive items. For instance, I don't see why it is worthwhile to be able to fold something like the following:
```rust
use foo;
use bar;
```
Furthermore, this causes problems if you want to fold a multiline import:
```rust
use foo::{
quux
};
use bar;
```
The problem is that now there are two possible folds at the same position: we could fold the first use or we could fold the import group. IMO, the only place where folding groups makes sense is when folding comments. Therefore I have **removed folding import groups in favor of folding multiline imports**.
Regarding folding comments, I made it a bit more robust by requiring that comments can only be folded if they have the same flavor. So if you have a bunch of `//` comments followed by `//!` comments, you will get two separate fold groups instead of a single one.
Finally, I rewrote the API in such a way that it should be trivial to add new folds. You only need to:
* Create a new FoldKind
* Add it to the `fold_kind` function that converts from `SyntaxKind` to `FoldKind`
Fixes#113
Co-authored-by: Adolfo Ochagavía <github@adolfo.ochagavia.xyz>
Implements a pretty barebones function signature help mechanism in
the language server.
Users can use `Analysis::resolve_callback()` to get basic information
about a call site.
Fixes#102
116: Collapse comments upon join r=matklad a=aochagavia
Todo:
- [x] Write tests
- [x] Resolve fixmes
- [x] Implement `comment_start_length` using the parser
I left a bunch of questions as fixmes. Can someone take a look at them? Also, I would love to use the parser to calculate the length of the leading characters in a comment (`//`, `///`, `//!`, `/*`), so any hints are greatly appreciated.
Co-authored-by: Adolfo Ochagavía <aochagavia92@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adolfo Ochagavía <github@adolfo.ochagavia.xyz>
93: Support leading pipe in match arms r=matklad a=DJMcNab
This adds support for match arms of the form:
```rust
<...>
| X | Y => <...>,
| X => <...>,
| 1..2 => <...>,
etc
```
# Implementation discussion
This just naïvely 'eats' a leading pipe if one is available. The equivalent line in the reference `libsyntax` is in [`parse_arm`](441519536c/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs (L3552)).
As noted in the comment linked above, this feature was formally introduced as a result of rust-lang/rfcs#1925. This feature is in active use in the [`rust-analyzer` codebase](c87fcb4ea5/crates/ra_syntax/src/syntax_kinds/generated.rs (L231))
I have added some tests for this feature, but maybe more would be required
EDIT: Always looking for feedback - is this PR description over-engineered?
Co-authored-by: Daniel McNab <36049421+djmcnab@users.noreply.github.com>
