use `check_region_obligations_and_report_errors` to avoid ICEs
If we don't call `process_registered_region_obligations` before `resolve_regions_and_report_errors` then we'll ICE if we have any region obligations, and `check_region_obligations_and_report_errors` just does both of these for us in a nice convenient function.
Fixes#53475
r? types
Generate correct suggestion with named arguments used positionally
Address issue #99265 by checking each positionally used argument
to see if the argument is named and adding a lint to use the name
instead. This way, when named arguments are used positionally in a
different order than their argument order, the suggested lint is
correct.
For example:
```
println!("{b} {}", a=1, b=2);
```
This will now generate the suggestion:
```
println!("{b} {a}", a=1, b=2);
```
Additionally, this check now also correctly replaces or inserts
only where the positional argument is (or would be if implicit).
Also, width and precision are replaced with their argument names
when they exists.
Since the issues were so closely related, this fix for issue #99265
also fixes issue #99266.
Fixes#99265Fixes#99266
LLVM 15 compatibility fixes
These are LLVM 15 compatibility fixes split out from #99464. There are three changes here:
* Emit elementtype attribtue for ldrex/strex intrinsics. This is requires as part of the opaque pointers migration.
* Make more tests compatible with opaque pointers. These are either new or aren't run on x86.
* Remove a test for `#[rustc_allocator]`. Since #99574 there are more requirement on the function signature. I dropped the test entirely, since we already test the effect of the attribute elsewhere.
* The main change: When a worker thread emits an error, wait for other threads to finish before unwinding the main thread and exiting. Otherwise workers may end up using globals for which destructors have already been run. This was probably never quite correct, but became an active problem with LLVM 15, because it started using global dtors in critical places, as part of ManagedStatic removal.
Fixes#99432 (and probably also #95679).
r? `@cuviper`
internal: Be more explicit when filtering built-in completions
We return every built-in type here, but only have `u32` in the tests, so let's look for that one to make tests more reliable across platforms.
Use line numbers relative to the function in mir-opt tests
As shown in #99770, the line numbers can be a big source of needless and confusing diffs. This PR adds a new flag `-Zmir-pretty-relative-line-numbers` to make them relative to the function declaration, which avoids most needless diffs from attribute changes.
`@JakobDegen` told me that there has been a zulip conversation about disabling line numbers with mixed opinions, so I'd like to get some feedback here, for this hopefully better solution.
r? rust-lang/wg-mir-opt
fix: Do completions in path qualifier position
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12566
Not too happy with the duplication needed for this, but it is what it is. Completions in path qualifiers will have to be filtered properly still, but its better to show too many completions for this than too few for now.
Sync `rust-analyzer`, add `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` binary to Rustc component
As discussed earlier with `@jyn514` and `@pietroalbini,` I'm also going to use this PR to have `dist::Rustc` build the `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` binary introduced in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/12871
fix: Insert spaces when inlining a function defined in a macro.
(partially) fixes#12860.
This PR (only) addresses the whitespace issue when inlining functions defined in macros.
Additionally, the indentation/spacing is not ideal, but works, e.g.
```rs
macro_rules! define_function {
() => { fn test_function_macro() {
if let Some(3) = 3i32.checked_add(0) {
println!("3 + 0 == 3");
}
} };
}
define_function!();
fn main() {
test_function_macro();
}
// previously became
// ...
fn main() {
ifletSome(3)=3i32.checked_add(0){println!("3 + 0 == 3");};
}
// now becomes
// ...
fn main() {
if let Some(3) = 3i32.checked_add(0){
println!("3 + 0 == 3");
};
}
```
The `self` -> `this` problem[^this] is (probably?) a separate problem that I am also looking into.
[^this]: As mentioned in [my comment on the above issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12860#issuecomment-1193231766), inlining a method defined in a macro does not properly replace `self` with the new local `this`.
