Remove hover inlay tooltips, replace them with location links
Turns out we re-implemented what clients can already figure out through the use of location-links. We might want lazy resolves tooltips later on still, but for now this simplifies things again.
Fix aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu_ilp32 target
This was broken because the synthetic object files produced by rustc were for 64-bit AArch64, which caused link failures when combined with 32-bit ILP32 object files.
This PR updates the object crate to 0.30.1 which adds support for generating ILP32 AArch64 object files.
Update mdbook
This updates mdbook from 0.4.21 to 0.4.25. The list of changes is [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#mdbook-0425). The only user-visible changes are some changes around the theme picker, and change to the copy-to-clipboard ignoring hidden lines.
Internally there were some dependency updates and small fixes.
This also updates `clap` from 4.0.15 to 4.0.32 whose changelog is [here](https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#4032---2022-12-22). This impacts tools like cargo. I don't see anything particularly noteworthy there, though there are some small user-visible changes.
Unfortunately this required adding a hack for building `rustix` with a bootstrap tool. The comment explains why. I am unable to think of some other workaround (or even a cleaner way to set the rustflag). Ideas are welcome if you can think of alternatives. I'm struggling to even think of a long-term solution, other than asking projects not to do auto-nightly feature detection.
One medium-term solution is to avoid the clap dependency for the mdbook library (which is how rustix gets pulled in). That is one of my goals for the 0.5 release of mdbook, but that probably won't happen until later this year. It would also require dropping clap from `rustbook` and using some other means to parse arguments (there's only two options, so it can probably be done manually).
remove recursive 'Display' implementations
closes#13920
`@lnicola` is this the solution you were looking for?
having explicitly unimplemented methods seems preferable to apparently implemented methods that can't be called
Fix panicking Option unwraping in match arm analysis
Hi, first PR here!
I've noticed my IDE sometimes briefly becoming pretty slow to respond while writing Rust. When checking the logs I found reams of this same error repeating itself.
```
thread 'Worker' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value'
crates/ide-assists/src/handlers/convert_match_to_let_else.rs:90:46
```
RA seemed to have been panicking on virtually every keystroke I made whenever I was part way through writing/refactoring a match statement of relevance to this assist.
The fix in this PR should be self-explanatory.
Migrate `rustc_lint` lint diagnostics
Part 2 of [Migrate `rustc_lint` errors to `SessionDiagnostic`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100776)
r? `@davidtwco`
# TODO
- [x] Refactor some lints manually implementing `DecorateLint` to use `Option<Subdiagnostic>`.
- [x] Add `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` to lint functions in `context.rs`.
- [x] Migrate `hidden_unicode_codepoints.rs`.
- [x] Migrate `UnsafeCode` in `builtin.rs`.
- [x] Migrate the rest of `builtin.rs`.
interior-mutable types should be 'static' rather than 'const
with the 'tracking' feature enabled, `limit::Limit` is interior mutable, so the `const` `hir_def::nameres::mod_resolution::MOD_DEPTH_LIMIT` is probably meant to be `static` rather than `const`.
with `const` you get a new copy of it everywhere it's used, instead of the shared, global value that seems to be the intent.
This fix brought to you by the catchily-named `clippy::declare_interior_mutable_const` lint.
Use CI LLVM in `test-various` builder
It was disabled because it needs `lld`, but since #104748 was merged it is no longer needed.
This will speed this test, since it no longer needs to build LLVM.
Refine search for const and function assoc items
This changes our searching behavior, before we always associated all usages and definitions of associated items with all implementations of a trait and the trait itself. Now, when searching for references of a an associated trait item, we still do the same and consider all implementations, but when searching for an associated item of an implementation we now only consider the uses of that specific implementations associated item.
This does not affect associated type aliases as we unfortunately are missing information in the IDE layer here still.
Move src/test to the root
See MCP at rust-lang/compiler-team#573
There may be more changes needed.
The first commit is just the move of the files:
You can check that the first commit did not do anything else than renames by running
```
git diff --diff-filter=r -M100% <rust-lang remote>/master <first commit hash>
```
The output should be empty, because the filter excludes renames, and the match threshold for qualifying a rename is 100%.
The second one is mostly a "find and replace" of `src/test` to `tests` and whatever is needed to make CI pass.
What is left to do:
---
- [x] Move directory
- [ ] Change references to `src/test`
- [x] Change references in-tree
- [ ] Change references in submodules / out-of-tree docs
- [x] Make CI pass:
- [x] Fix tidy
- [x] Fix tests
- [x] Bless tests if needed (shouldn't normally)
- [ ] Merge it !
Fix stack overflow in recursive AST walk in early lint
The src/test/ui/issues/issue-74564-if-expr-stack-overflow.rs test case added to verify https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74564 still crashes with a stack overflow on s390x-ibm-linux.
Symptom is a very deep recursion in compiler/rustc_lint/src/early.rs:
fn visit_expr(&mut self, e: &'a ast::Expr) {
self.with_lint_attrs(e.id, &e.attrs, |cx| {
lint_callback!(cx, check_expr, e);
ast_visit::walk_expr(cx, e);
})
}
(where walk_expr recursively calls back into visit_expr). The crash happens at a nesting depth of over 17000 stack frames when using the default 8 MB stack size on s390x.
This patch fixes the problem by adding a ensure_sufficient_stack call to the with_lint_attrs routine (which also should take care of all the other mutually recursive visitors here).
Fixes part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105383.
minor: tweak wording and remove blank issue template
There's already a "blank issue" link at the bottom, and some users seem to pick this one because it's the first.
