9244: feat: Make block-local trait impls work r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
As long as either the trait or the implementing type are defined in the same block.
CC #8961
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
9239: fix: Fix coercion in match with expected type r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
Plus add infrastructure to test type mismatches without expect.
CC #8961
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
8717: Update match checking algorithm r=iDawer a=iDawer
I've recently got interest in the match checking to extend the current algo to support reporting witnesses of non-exhaustiveness.
It appears the algo is outdated from rustc's implementation. I decided to rewrite it based on the latest rustc's version. It is a diff-based port to ra codebase. That means you can diff-compare these files to rustc.
I'm striving to keep minimal ra-related changes in the algo to make it easier to backport future changes from the upstream.
Based on upstream algorithm of version rust-lang/rust 1.52.0-nightly (25c15cdbe 2021-04-22)
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/25c15cdbe/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/usefulness.rs
The goal of this PR is to cover the current `missing-match-arm` diagnostic.
What is remaining to do:
- [x] Error handling. The errors that are unrelated to match checking will be handled before the check. Just like how it made in rustc.
- [x] Lowering `hir_def::expr::Pat` to `hir_ty::diagnostics::match_check::Pat`. rustc's match checking works on top of `rustc_mir_build::thir::Pat`, which is lowered from `hir::Pat` and carries some extra semantics used by the check. All unrelated checks are done there. RA could use this to rule out running the check on unimplemented cases (`Pat::ConstBlock`, etc).
- [x] ~~Proper~~Loose typecheck of match arm patterns (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8840, https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8875).
- [x] Tests from `hir_ty::diagnostics::match_check::tests`.
- [x] Clean up `todo`s
- [x] Test run on real repos https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8717#issuecomment-847120265.
Co-authored-by: Dawer <7803845+iDawer@users.noreply.github.com>
fn is_useful , more skeletons
Specify a lifetime on pattern references
impl PatStack
fill impl Matrix
PatStack::pop_head_constructor
Index-based approach
struct PatCtxt
fields construction fn Fields::wildcards
split wildcard
fn Constructor::is_covered_by_any(..)
fn Matrix::specialize_constructor(..)
impl Usefulness
Initial work on witness construction
Reorganize files
Replace match checking diagnostic
Handle types of expanded patterns
unit match checking go brrr
8866: Update salsa r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This updates salsa to include https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/265, and removes all cancellation-related code from rust-analyzer
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
The idea here is to eventually get rid of `dyn Diagnostic` and
`DiagnosticSink` infrastructure altogether, and just have a `enum
hir::Diagnostic` instead.
The problem with `dyn Diagnostic` is that it is defined in the lowest
level of the stack (hir_expand), but is used by the highest level (ide).
As a first step, we free hir_expand and hir_def from `dyn Diagnostic`
and kick the can up to `hir_ty`, as an intermediate state. The plan is
then to move DiagnosticSink similarly to the hir crate, and, as final
third step, remove its usage from the ide.
One currently unsolved problem is testing. You can notice that the test
which checks precise diagnostic ranges, unresolved_import_in_use_tree,
was moved to the ide layer. Logically, only IDE should have the infra to
render a specific range.
At the same time, the range is determined with the data produced in
hir_def and hir crates, so this layering is rather unfortunate. Working
on hir_def shouldn't require compiling `ide` for testing.
8987: Fix lowering of FnOnce() without return type r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This should result in an implicit `-> ()`, not leaving out the binding.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Chalk's unification can sometimes create lifetime variables, which we
currently don't really deal with, but at least we don't want to leak
them outside of inference.
Should fix#8919.
We can't do the easy hack that we did before anymore, where we kept
track of whether any inference variables changed since the last time we
rechecked obligations. Instead, we store the obligations in
canonicalized form; that way we can easily check the inference variables
to see whether they have changed since the goal was canonicalized.
8813: Get some more array lengths! r=lf- a=lf-
This is built on #8799 and thus contains its changes. I'll rebase it onto master when that one gets merged. It adds support for r-a understanding the length of:
* `let a: [u8; 2] = ...`
* `let a = b"aaa"`
* `let a = [0u8; 4]`
I have added support for getting the values of byte strings, which was not previously there. I am least confident in the correctness of this part and it probably needs some more tests, as we currently have only one test that exercised that part (!).
Fixes#2922.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
Fix#2922: add unknown length as a condition for a type having unknown.
Incorporate reviews:
* Extract some of the const evaluation workings into functions
* Add fixmes on the hacks
* Add tests for impls on specific array lengths (these work!!! 😁)
* Add tests for const generics (indeed we don't support it yet)
8799: Add basic support for array lengths in types r=flodiebold a=lf-
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
