11490: Correctly fix formatting doc tests with generics r=Veykril a=KarlWithK
Before the doc_test would be outputted like this:
```zsh
"Foo<T, U>::t"
```
However, this would cause problems with shell redirection. I've changed it
so when generics are involved we simply wrap the expression under quotes as so:
```zsh
"\"Foo<T, U>::t\""
```
Note:
At the cost of adding this, I had to allocate a new string via
`format!{}`. However, I argue this is alright as this for just for
outputting the name of the doc test.
The following tests have been changed:
```
runnables::tests::doc_test_type_params
runnables::tests::test_doc_runnables_impl_mod
runnables::tests::test_runnables_doc_test_in_impl
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/11489
Co-authored-by: KarlWithK <jocelinc60@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: SeniorMars <jocelinc60@outlook.com>
11481: Display parameter names when hovering over a function pointer r=Veykril a=Vannevelj
Implements #11474
The idea is pretty straightforward: previously we constructed the hover based on just the parameter types, now we pass in the parameter names as well. I went for a quick-hit approach here but I expect someone will be able to point me to a better way of resolving the identifier.
I haven't figured out yet how to actually run my rust-analyzer locally so I can see it in action but the unit test indicates it should work.
Co-authored-by: Jeroen Vannevel <jer_vannevel@outlook.com>
11424: Pass required features to cargo when using run action r=Veykril a=WaffleLapkin
When using `F1`->`Rust Analyzer: Run` action on an `example`, pass its `required-features` to `cargo run`. This allows to run examples that were otherwise impossible to run with RA.
Co-authored-by: Maybe Waffle <waffle.lapkin@gmail.com>
Before the doc_test would be outputted like this:
"Foo<T, U>::t"
However, this would cause shells with shell redirection. I've changed it
so when generics are involved we simply wrap the expression under escape
chanters as so:
"\"Foo<T, U>::t\""
Note:
At the cost of adding this, I had to allocate a new string via
format!{}. However, I argue this is alright as this for just for
outputting the name of the doc test.
The following tests have been changed:
runnables::tests::doc_test_type_params
runnables::tests::test_doc_runnables_impl_mod
runnables::tests::test_runnables_doc_test_in_impl
11369: feat: Add type hint for keyword expression hovers r=Veykril a=danii
Adds the return type of keywords to tool-tips where it makes sense. This applies to: `if`, `else`, `match`, `loop`, `unsafe` and `await`. Thanks to `@Veykril` for sharing the idea of putting return type highlighting on other keywords!
Closes#11359
Co-authored-by: Daniel Conley <himself@danii.dev>
11442: fix(rename): Use text range of a mod name after macro expansion r=Veykril a=tysg
Fixes#11417.
11460: fix: documentation of SsrParams r=Veykril a=nemethf
Fix#11429 by extending the documentation of SsrParms with the
mandatory field 'selections'. Copy its description from lsp_ext.rs.
Co-authored-by: Tianyi Song <42670338+tysg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felicián Németh <felician.nemeth@gmail.com>
Extracting a struct from an enum variant now filters out only the
generic parameters necessary for the new struct.
Bounds will be copied to the new struct, but unneeded ones are not
filtered out.
Extracting bounds in a where clause are still not implemented.
11444: feat: Fix up syntax errors in attribute macro inputs to make completion work more often r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This implements the "fix up syntax nodes" workaround mentioned in #11014. It isn't much more than a proof of concept; I have only implemented a few cases, but it already helps quite a bit.
Some notes:
- I'm not super happy about how much the fixup procedure needs to interact with the syntax node -> token tree conversion code (e.g. needing to share the token map). This could maybe be simplified with some refactoring of that code.
- It would maybe be nice to have the fixup procedure reuse or share information with the parser, though I'm not really sure how much that would actually help.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
11437: [ide_completion] render if a function is async/const/unsafe in completion details r=Veykril a=jhgg
this change renders in the autocomplete detail, whether a function is async/const/unsafe.
i found myself wanting to know this information at a glance, so now it renders here:
Co-authored-by: Jake Heinz <jh@discordapp.com>
