1562: Continue support for .await r=matklad a=unrealhoang
- add await expr to ast and HIR Expr
- infer type for `.await`
Co-authored-by: Unreal Hoang <unrealhoang@gmail.com>
1515: Trait environment r=matklad a=flodiebold
This adds the environment, i.e. the set of `where` clauses in scope, when solving trait goals. That means that e.g. in
```rust
fn foo<T: SomeTrait>(t: T) {}
```
, we are able to complete methods of `SomeTrait` on the `t`. This affects the trait APIs quite a bit (since every method that needs to be able to solve for some trait needs to get this environment somehow), so I thought I'd do it rather sooner than later ;)
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
This wasn't a right decision in the first place, the feature flag was
broken in the last rustfmt release, and syntax highlighting of imports
is more important anyway
For Send/Sync/Sized, we don't handle auto traits correctly yet and because they
have a lot of impls, they can easily lead to slowdowns. In the case of
Fn/FnMut/FnOnce, we don't parse the special Fn notation correctly yet and don't
handle closures yet, so we are very unlikely to find an impl.
This is slightly hacky, but maybe more elegant than alternative solutions: We
just use a hardcoded Chalk trait ID which we special-case to have no impls.
This fixes the order in which candidates are chosen a bit (not completely
though, as the ignored test demonstrates), and makes autoderef work with trait
methods. As a side effect, this also makes completion of trait methods work :)
- make it possible to get parent trait from method
- add 'obligation' machinery for checking that a type implements a
trait (and inferring facts about type variables from that)
- handle type parameters of traits (to a certain degree)
- improve the hacky implements check to cover enough cases to exercise the
handling of traits with type parameters
- basic canonicalization (will probably also be done by Chalk)
1076: Const body inference r=flodiebold a=Lapz
This is the second part of #887. I've added type inference on const bodies and introduced the DefWithBody containing Function, Const and Static. I want to add tests but im unsure on how I would go about testing that completions work.
Co-authored-by: Lenard Pratt <l3np27@gmail.com>
Implement `BindingMode` for pattern matching, so that types can be
correctly inferred using match ergonomics. The binding mode defaults to
`Move` (referred to as 'BindingMode::BindByValue` in rustc), and is
updated by automatic dereferencing of the value being matched.
I think it'll be better to make the path resolution the number of unresolved
segments, not the first unresolved index; then this error could simply not have
happened. But I'll do that separately.
866: Implement basic support for Associated Methods r=flodiebold a=vipentti
This is my attempt at learning to understand how the type inference works by adding basic support for associated methods. Currently it does not resolve associated types or constants.
The basic idea is that `Resolver::resolve_path` returns a new `PathResult` type, which has two variants, `FullyResolved` and `PartiallyResolved`, fully resolved matches the previous behavior, where as `PartiallyResolved` contains the `PerNs<Resolution` in addition to a `segment_index` which contains the index of the segment which we failed to resolve. This index can then be used to continue inference in `infer_path_expr` using the `Type` we managed to resolve.
This changes some of the previous apis, so looking for feedback and suggestions.
This should enable fixing #832
Co-authored-by: Ville Penttinen <villem.penttinen@gmail.com>
This is done in `infer_path_expr`. When `Resolver::resolve_path` returns
`PartiallyResolved`, we use the returned `Resolution` together with the given
`segment_index` to check if we can find something matching the segment at
segment_index in the impls for that particular type.
701: Minor type inference tweaks r=flodiebold a=marcusklaas
Pass down expectation for reference expressions and type the guard in match expressions.
I wasn't able to add a test for the former addition because the type variable previously introduced would always resolve to the right type in the things I tried!
Co-authored-by: Marcus Klaas de Vries <mail@marcusklaas.nl>
