I implemented that by checking the expressions' type.
This could probably be implemented better by taking the function's return type and substituting the generic parameter with the provided turbofish, but this is more complicated.
feat: Add a "Unmerge match arm" assist to split or-patterns inside match expressions
Fixes#13072.
The way I implemented it it leaves the `OrPat` in place even if there is only one pattern now but I don't think something will break because of that, and when more code will be typed we'll parse it again anyway. Removing it (but keeping the child pattern) is hard, I don't know how to do that.
Move empty diagnostics workaround back into the server
This only touches on the diagnostics in one place instead of multiple as was previously done, since all published diagnostics will go through this code path anyways.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/13130
Remove auto-config patching from the VSCode client
This was introduced 4 months ago when we drastically changed the config keys. I'd like to remove this given I always felt uneasy doing edits to a users config from within r-a, and by now most if not all users should've swapped to a new enough version of r-a that should've updated their configs.
The extension will continue to work fine even with the outdated keys afterwards since we still do patching server side as well, and that one we'll have to support for quite some more time (if not until a proper 1.0 release where I assume we can allow ourselves some more user facing breakage)
(There also might've been a small bug in here that prevented users with certain outdated keys to prevent them from enabling certain keys for some reason)
Make use of NoHash hashing for FileId and CrateId
Both of these are mere integers so there is nothing to hash here.
Ideally we would use this for `la_arena::Idx` too, but that doesn't work due to the orphan rule, and `la_arena` is unfortunately a public library so we can't really do much here... Unless we remove the trait restriction but I'd like not to
internal: Re-export standard semantic token types and mods
Should help in preventing future occurences of #13099 by having all token types and mods come through the same place
Add some more highlighting configurations
The following can be enabled/disabled now in terms of highlighting:
- doc comment injection (enabled by default)
- punctuation highlighting (disabled by default)
- operator highlighting (enabled by default)
- punctuation specialized highlighting (disabled by default)
- operator specialized highlighting (disabled by default)
- macro call bang highlighting (disabled by default)
This PR also changes our `attribute` semantic token type to the `decorator` type which landed upstream (but not yet in lsp-types).
Specialized highlighting is disabled by default, as all clients will have to ship something to map these back to the standard punctuation/operator token (we do this in VSCode via the inheritance mapping for example). This is a lot of maintenance work, and not something every client wants to do, pushing that need to use the user. As this is a rather niche use in the first place this will just be disabled by default.
Punctuation highlighting is disabled by default, punctuation is usually something that can be done by the native syntactic highlighting of the client, so there is no loss in quality. The main reason for this though is that punctuation adds a lot of extra token data that we sent over, a lot of clients struggle with applying this, so disabling this improves the UX for a lot of people. Note that we still highlight punctuations with special meaning as that special entity, (the never type `!` will still be tagged as a builtin type if it occurs as such)
Separate highlighting of the macro call bang `!` is disabled by default, as I think people actually didn't like that change that much, though at the same time I feel like not many people even noticed that change (I prefer it be separate, but that's not enough reason for it to be enabled by default I believe :^) )
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12783https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/13066