Drive-by `DUMMY_SP` -> `Span` and fmt changes
Noticed these while doing something else. There's no practical change, but it's preferable to use `DUMMY_SP` as little as possible, particularly when we have perfectlly useful `Span`s available.
Allow AST and HIR visitors to return `ControlFlow`
Alternative to #108598.
Since rust-lang/libs-team#187 was rejected, this implements our own version of the `Try` trait (`VisitorResult`) and the `try` macro (`try_visit`). Since this change still allows visitors to return `()`, no changes have been made to the existing ones. They can be done in a separate PR.
Move the extra directives for `Mode::CoverageRun` into `iter_header`
When these extra directives were ported over as part of #112300, it made sense to introduce `iter_header_extra` and pass them in as an extra argument.
But now that #120881 has added a `mode` parameter to `iter_header` for its own purposes, it's slightly simpler to move the coverage special-case code directly into `iter_header` as well. This lets us get rid of `iter_header_extra`.
Merge `CompilerError::CompilationFailed` and `CompilerError::ICE`.
`CompilerError` has `CompilationFailed` and `ICE` variants, which seems reasonable at first. But the way it identifies them is flawed:
- If compilation errors out, i.e. `RunCompiler::run` returns an `Err`, it uses `CompilationFailed`, which is reasonable.
- If compilation panics with `FatalError`, it catches the panic and uses `ICE`. This is sometimes right, because ICEs do cause `FatalError` panics, but sometimes wrong, because certain compiler errors also cause `FatalError` panics. (The compiler/rustdoc/clippy/whatever just catches the `FatalError` with `catch_with_exit_code` in `main`.)
In other words, certain non-ICE compilation failures get miscategorized as ICEs. It's not possible to reliably distinguish the two cases, so this commit merges them. It also renames the combined variant as just `Failed`, to better match the existing `Interrupted` and `Skipped` variants.
Here is an example of a non-ICE failure that causes a `FatalError` panic, from `tests/ui/recursion_limit/issue-105700.rs`:
```
#![recursion_limit="4"]
#![invalid_attribute]
#![invalid_attribute]
#![invalid_attribute]
#![invalid_attribute]
#![invalid_attribute]
//~^ERROR recursion limit reached while expanding
fn main() {{}}
```
r? ``@spastorino``
unstable-book: Separate testing and production sanitizers
This is a redo of [this PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108942). Left the commit as before (except for reflowing to 80-width), since it already got approved.
Change leak check and suspicious auto trait lint warning messages
The leak check lint message "this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!" is misleading as some cases may not be phased out and could end being accepted. This is under discussion still.
The suspicious auto trait lint the change in behavior already happened, so the new message is probably more accurate.
r? `@lcnr`
Closes#93367
pattern_analysis: Move constructor selection logic to `PlaceInfo`
This is a small refactor PR. There was a dense bit of constructor-related logic in `compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness`. I'm moving it out into a `PlaceInfo` method to make it easier to follow both separately. I also have plans that will complicate it further so it's good that it's somewhat encapsulated.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Reimpl meaningful test name lint MCP658
This reintroduces the tidy rule originally proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113583 that then became an MCP in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/658 which eventually surfaced a quite-reasonable request for a diagnostic enhancement. I have added that to the rule. It produces output like this:
```
tidy error: file `ui/unsized/issue-115809.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-115809.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/unsized/issue-115203.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-115203.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-113860-2.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-113860.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-117997.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-117997.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-119463.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-119463.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/auxiliary/issue-117997.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-117997.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/auxiliary/issue-119463-extern.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-119463.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-113860-1.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-113860.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-113860.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-113860.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/const_kind_expr/issue_114151.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-114151.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/did_you_mean/issue-114112.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-114112.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/did_you_mean/issue-105225.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-105225.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/did_you_mean/issue-105225-named-args.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-105225.rs`
```
You get the idea.
There are some tests which merely would require reordering of the name according to the rule. I could modify the diagnostic further to identify those, but doing such would make it prone to bad suggestions. I have opted to trust contributors to recognize the diagnostic is robotic, as the pattern we are linting on is easier to match if we do not speculate on what parts of the name are meaningful: sometimes a word is a reason, but sometimes it is a mere "tag", such as with a pair like:
- issue-314159265-blue.rs
- issue-314159265-red.rs
Starting them with `red-` and `blue-` means they do not sort together, despite being related, and the color names are still not very descriptive. Recognizing a good name is an open-ended task, though this pair might be:
- colored-circle-gen-blue.rs
- colored-circle-gen-red.rs
Deciding exactly *how* to solve this is not the business of tidy, only recognizing a what.
r? `@compiler-errors`
deduplicate infer var instantiation
Having 3 separate implementations of one of the most subtle parts of our type system is not a good strategy if we want to maintain a sound type system ✨ while working on this I already found some subtle bugs in the existing code, so that's awesome 🎉 cc #121159
This was necessary as I am not confident in my nll changes in #119106, so I am first cleaning this up in a separate PR.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Setup infra for handling auto trait bounds disabled due to perf problems
This patch updates some of the partially-implemented functions of `ChalkContext as RustIrDatabase`, namely `adt_datum()` and `impl_provided_for()`. With those, we can now correctly work with auto trait bounds and distinguish methods based on them.
Resolves#7856 (the second code; the first one is resolved by #13074)
**IMPORTANT**: I don't think we want to merge this until #7637 is resolved. Currently this patch introduces A LOT of unknown types and type mismtaches as shown below. This is because we cannot resolve items like `hashbrown::HashMap` in `std` modules, leading to auto trait bounds on them and their dependents unprovable.
|crate (from `rustc-perf@c52ee6` except for r-a)|e3dc5a588f07d6f1d3a0f33051d4af26190abe9e|HEAD of this branch|
|---|---|---|
|rust-analyzer @ e3dc5a588f |exprs: 417528, ??ty: 907 (0%), ?ty: 114 (0%), !ty: 1|exprs: 417528, ??ty: 1704 (0%), ?ty: 403 (0%), !ty: 20|
|ripgrep|exprs: 62120, ??ty: 2 (0%), ?ty: 0 (0%), !ty: 0|exprs: 62120, ??ty: 132 (0%), ?ty: 58 (0%), !ty: 11|
|webrender/webrender|exprs: 94355, ??ty: 49 (0%), ?ty: 16 (0%), !ty: 2|exprs: 94355, ??ty: 429 (0%), ?ty: 130 (0%), !ty: 7|
|diesel|exprs: 132591, ??ty: 401 (0%), ?ty: 5129 (3%), !ty: 31|exprs: 132591, ??ty: 401 (0%), ?ty: 5129 (3%), !ty: 31|
feat: add unresolved-ident diagnostic
This should cover missing local variables and missing unit structs and the like. It's conservatively marked experimental
feat!: create alias when renaming an import.
Closes#15858
Implemented:
- [x] - Prevent using `reserved` keywords (e.g self) and `_`.
- [x] - Rename other modules that might be referencing the import.
- [x] - Fix "broken" tests.
- [ ] - Rename **only** "direct" references.
- [ ] - Test more cases.
Future possibilities:
1. Also support `extern crate <name>` syntax.
2. Allow aliasing `self` when it is inside an `UseTreeList`.
~3. If import path already has an alias, "rename" the alias.~
~[4. Create alias even if path is not the last path segment.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16489#issuecomment-1930541697)~
feat: add non-exhaustive-let diagnostic
I want this to have a quickfix to add an else branch but I couldn't figure out how to do that, so here's the diagnostic on its own. It pretends a `let` is a match with one arm, and asks the match checking whether that match would be exhaustive.
Previously the pattern was checked based on its own type, but that was causing a panic in `match_check` (while processing e.g. `crates/hir/src/lib.rs`) so I changed it to use the initialiser's type instead, to align with the checking of actual match expressions. I think the panic can still happen, but I hear that `match_check` is going to be updated to a new version from rustc, so I'm posting this now in the hopes that the panic will magically go away when that happens.
Deduplicate references when some of them are in macro expansions
EDIT: I wonder if this is a regression, I'll try to investigate.
Commit 6a06f6f72 (Deduplicate reference search results, 2022-11-07)
deduplicates references within each definition.
Apparently our descend_into_macros() stanza returns
one definition for each time a name is used in a macro.
Each of those definitions has the same set of references.
We return them all, leading to many redundant references.
Work around this by deduplicating definitions as well. Perhaps there
is a better fix to not produce duplicate definitions in the first
place.
I discovered this working with the "bitflags" macro from the crate
of the same name.
Fixes#16357
distribute tool documentations and avoid file conflicts on `x install`
I suggest reading commits one-by-one with the descriptions for more context about the changes.
Fixes#115213
test: include `rename_path_inside_use_tree`.
Keeps tracks the progress of the changes. 3 other tests broke with the changes
of this.
feat: rename all other usages within the current file.
feat: fix most of the implementation problems.
test: `rename_path_inside_use_tree` tests a more complicated scenario.
Commit 6a06f6f72 (Deduplicate reference search results, 2022-11-07) deduplicates references
within each definition.
There is an edge case when requesting references of a macro argument. Apparently, our
descend_into_macros() stanza in references.rs produces a cartesian product of
- references inside the macro times
- times references outside the macro.
Since the above deduplication only applies to the references within a single definition, we
return them all, leading to many redundant references.
Work around this by deduplicating definitions as well. Perhaps there is a better fix to not
produce this cartesian product in the first place; but I think at least for definitions the
problem would remain; a macro can contain multiple definitions of the same name, but since the
navigation target will be the unresolved location, it's the same for all of them.
We can't use unique() because we don't want to drop references that don't have a declaration
(though I dont' have an example for this case).
I discovered this working with the "bitflags" macro from the crate of the same name.
Fixes#16357
feat: Support multiple tab stops for completions in VSCode
Uses the native VSCode support for `SnippetTextEdit`s. Fixes#13229 and fixes#8531.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/13354275/a2d2c033-bb30-4f34-92ca-bf3f4f744cdc
This is done in a slightly hacky way, as `vscode-languageclient` can't convert RA's `SnippetTextEdit`s into vscode `SnippetTextEdit`s and will appear to use a [different format](295aaa393f/types/src/main.ts (L1501-L1516)) in the future.
---
~~Marked as draft since as-is, this will cause completions to double-indent any multi-line code generated.~~
**Update:** This also fixes up edits so that any multi-line code won't be double-indented.
