5565: SSR: Don't mix non-path-based rules with path-based r=matklad a=davidlattimore
If any rules contain paths, then we reject any rules that don't contain paths. Allowing a mix leads to strange semantics, since the path-based rules only match things where the path refers to semantically the same thing, whereas the non-path-based rules could match anything. Specifically, if we have a rule like `foo ==>> bar` we only want to match the `foo` that is in the current scope, not any `foo`. However "foo" can be parsed as a pattern (BIND_PAT -> NAME -> IDENT). Allowing such a rule through would result in renaming everything called `foo` to `bar`. It'd also be slow, since without a path, we'd have to use the slow-scan search mechanism.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
If any rules contain paths, then we reject any rules that don't contain paths. Allowing a mix leads to strange semantics, since the path-based rules only match things where the path refers to semantically the same thing, whereas the non-path-based rules could match anything. Specifically, if we have a rule like `foo ==>> bar` we only want to match the `foo` that is in the current scope, not any `foo`. However "foo" can be parsed as a pattern (BIND_PAT -> NAME -> IDENT). Allowing such a rule through would result in renaming everything called `foo` to `bar`. It'd also be slow, since without a path, we'd have to use the slow-scan search mechanism.
Addresses two issues:
- keep the parens from dbg!() in case the call is chained or there is
semantic difference if parens are excluded
- Exclude the semicolon after the dbg!(); by checking if it was
accidentally included in the macro_call
investigated, but decided against:
fix ast::MacroCall extraction to never include semicolons at the end -
this logic lives in rowan.
Defensively shorten the macro_range if there is a semicolon token.
Deleted unneccessary temp variable macro_args
Renamed macro_content to "paste_instead_of_dbg", because it isn't a
simple extraction of text inside dbg!() anymore
It seems that Semantics::scope, if given a statement node, won't resolve
locals that were defined in the current scope, only in parent scopes.
Not sure if this is intended / expected behavior, but we work around it
for now by finding another nearby node to use as the scope (e.g. the
expression inside the EXPR_STMT).
5520: Add DocumentData to represent in-memory document with LSP info r=matklad a=kjeremy
At the moment this only holds document version information but in the near-future it will hold other things like semantic token delta info.
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
5522: Increace tracing-tree version from 0.1.3 to 0.1.4 r=kjeremy a=vandenheuvel
Co-authored-by: Bram van den Heuvel <b.vandenheuvel@student.tudelft.nl>
5516: Better LSP conformance r=matklad a=vsrs
At the moment rust-analyzer does not fully conform to the LSP. This PR fixes two LSP related issues:
1) rust-analyzer sends predefined server capabilities and does not take supplied client capabilities in mind.
2) rust-analyzer uses dynamic `textDocument/didSave` registration even if the client does not support it.
Co-authored-by: vsrs <vit@conrlab.com>
5518: Use resolved paths in SSR rules r=matklad a=davidlattimore
The main user-visible changes are:
* SSR now matches paths based on whether they resolve to the same thing instead of whether they're written the same.
* So `foo()` won't match `foo()` if it's a different function `foo()`, but will match `bar::foo()` if it's the same `foo`.
* Paths in the replacement will now be rendered with appropriate qualification for their context.
* For example `foo::Bar` will render as just `Bar` inside the module `foo`, but might render as `baz::foo::Bar` from elsewhere.
* This means that all paths in the search pattern and replacement template must be able to be resolved.
* It now also matters where you invoke SSR from, since paths are resolved relative to wherever that is.
* Search now uses find-uses on paths to locate places to try matching. This means that when a path is present in the pattern, search will generally be pretty fast.
* Function calls can now match method calls again, but this time only if they resolve to the same function.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
This differs from how this used to work before I removed it in that:
a) It's only one direction. Function calls in the pattern can match
method calls in the code, but not the other way around.
b) We now check that the function call in the pattern resolves to the
same function as the method call in the code.
The lack of (b) was the reason I felt the need to remove the feature
before.
Previously, submatches were handled simply by searching in placeholders
for more matches. That only works if we search all nodes in the tree
recursively. In a subsequent commit, I intend to make search not always
be recursive recursive. This commit prepares for that by finding all
matches, even if they overlap, then nesting them and removing
overlapping matches.
In a later commit, paths in templates will be resolved. This allows us
to render the path with appropriate qualifiers for its context. Here we
prepare for that change by updating existing tests where I'd previously
not bothered to define the items that the template referred to.
The methods `edits_for_file` and `find_matches_in_file` are replaced with just `edits` and `matches`. This simplifies the API a bit, but more importantly it makes it possible in a subsequent commit for SSR to decide to not search all files.
Also renamed find_matches to slow_scan_node to reflect that it's a slow
way to do things. Actually the name came from a later commit and
probably makes more sense once there's an alternative.
This is in preparation for a subsequent commit where we add special
handling for paths in the template, allowing them to be qualified
differently in different contexts.
Previously we had:
- Multiple rules
- Each rule had its pattern parsed as an expression, path etc
This meant that there were two levels at which there could be multiple
rules.
Now we just have multiple rules. If a pattern can parse as more than one
kind of thing, then they get stored as multiple separate rules.
We also now don't have separate fields for the different kinds of things
that a pattern can parse as. This makes adding new kinds of things
simpler.
Previously, add_search_pattern would construct a rule with a dummy
replacement. Now the replacement is an Option. This is slightly cleaner
and also opens the way for parsing the replacement template as the same
kind of thing as the search pattern.
5498: assists: change_return_type_to_result: clarify assist description r=matklad a=matthiaskrgr
I had a -> Option<PathBuf> fn, which I wanted to change to Result<PathBuf, _>, but despite advertising to do so, the assist did not change the result type to Result<PathBuf, _> but instead just wrapped it in a Result: <Result<Option<PathBuf>, _>.
I changed the assist description to "Wrap return type in Result" to clarify that the assist only wraps the preexisting type and does not do any actual Option-to-Result refactoring.
Co-authored-by: Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>
5497: Store macro invocation parameters as text instead of tt r=jonas-schievink a=lnicola
We don't want to expand macros on every source change because it can be arbitrarily slow, but the token trees can be rather large. So instead we can cache the invocation parameters (as text).
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
I had a -> Option<PathBuf> fn, which I wanted to change to Result<PathBuf, _>, but despite advertising to do so, the assist did not
change the result type to Result<PathBuf, _> but instead just wrapped it in a Result: <Result<Option<PathBuf>, _>.
I changed the assist description to "Wrap return type in Result" to clarify that the assist only wraps the preexisting type and does
not do any deep Option-to-Result refactoring.
5481: Track document versions in the server r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
This also pushes diagnostics for the correct file version on close so that when it is reopened stale diagnostics are not shown.
Closes#5452
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <kjeremy@gmail.com>
5478: Replace existing visibility modifier in fix_visibility r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Fixes#4636
I would have liked to do something about the `// FIXME: this really should be a fix for diagnostic, rather than an assist.`, but that would take a while and there's no reason not to fix this immediately.
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
5451: Highlight more cases of SyntaxKind when it is a punctuation r=matklad a=GrayJack
This maybe closes#5406
Closes #5453
Separate what one expect to be a punctuation semantic token (like `,`, `;`, `(`, etc), and what is not (`&`, `::`, `+`, etc)
5463: Bump lexer r=matklad a=kjeremy
Since we're now on rust 1.45
5465: Bump chalk r=matklad a=kjeremy
5466: Do not show default types in function and closure return values r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Avoid things like
<img width="522" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/87985936-1bbe4f80-cae5-11ea-9b8a-5383d896c296.png">
Co-authored-by: GrayJack <gr41.j4ck@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
5467: Allow null or empty values for configuration r=matklad a=kjeremy
Allow the client to respond to `workspace/configuration` with `null` values. This is allowed per the spec if the client doesn't know about the configuration we've requested.
This also protects against `null` or `{}` during initialize. I'm not sure if we want to interpret `{}` as "don't change anything" but I think that's a reasonable approach to take.
This should help with LSP clients working out of the box.
Fixes#5464
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
