- don't return the receiver type from method resolution; instead just
return the autorefs/autoderefs that happened and repeat them. This
ensures all the effects like trait obligations and whatever we learned
about type variables from derefing them are actually applied. Also, it
allows us to get rid of `decanonicalize_ty`, which was just wrong in
principle.
- Autoderef itself now directly works with an inference table. Sadly
this has the effect of making it harder to use as an iterator, often
requiring manual `while let` loops. (rustc works around this by using
inner mutability in the inference context, so that things like unifying
types don't require a unique reference.)
- We now record the adjustments (autoref/deref) for method receivers
and index expressions, which we didn't before.
- Removed the redundant crate parameter from method resolution, since
the trait_env contains the crate as well.
- in the HIR API, the methods now take a scope to determine the trait env.
`Type` carries a trait env, but I think that's probably a bad decision
because it's easy to create it with the wrong env, e.g. by using
`Adt::ty`. This mostly didn't matter so far because
`iterate_method_candidates` took a crate parameter and ignored
`self.krate`, but the trait env would still have been wrong in those
cases, which I think would give some wrong results in some edge cases.
Fixes#10058.
Today, rust-analyzer (and rustc, and bat, and IntelliJ) fail badly on
some kinds of maliciously constructed code, like a deep sequence of
nested parenthesis.
"Who writes 100k nested parenthesis" you'd ask?
Well, in a language with macros, a run-away macro expansion might do
that (see the added tests)! Such expansion can be broad, rather than
deep, so it bypasses recursion check at the macro-expansion layer, but
triggers deep recursion in parser.
In the ideal world, the parser would just handle deeply nested structs
gracefully. We'll get there some day, but at the moment, let's try to be
simple, and just avoid expanding macros with unbalanced parenthesis in
the first place.
closes#9358
7961: add user docs for ssr assist r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
@matklad
This is a small follow up on #7874, adding user docs for the SSR assist functionality. Since most other assists aren't handled this way I wasn't sure exactly how we wanted to document this, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
