Or macro_rules hygiene, or mixed site hygiene. In other words, hygiene for variables and labels but not items.
The realization that made me implement this was that while "full" hygiene (aka. def site hygiene) is really hard for us to implement, and will likely involve intrusive changes and performance losses, since every `Name` will have to carry hygiene, mixed site hygiene is very local: it applies only to bodies, and we very well can save it in a side map with minor losses.
This fixes one diagnostic in r-a that was about `izip!()` using hygiene (yay!) but it introduces a huge number of others, because of #18262. Up until now this issue wasn't a major problem because it only affected few cases, but with hygiene identifiers referred by macros like that are not resolved at all. The next commit will fix that.
When debugging rust-analyzer and looking at logs, it's much easier to read
when the timestamp is in the local timezone.
Before:
2024-08-28T20:55:38.792321Z INFO ParseQuery: invoked at R18460
After:
2024-08-28T13:55:38.792321-07:00 INFO ParseQuery: invoked at R18460
I didn't follow rustc precisely, because I think it does some things wrongly (or they are FIXME), but I only allowed more code, not less. So we're all fine.
internal: Replace once_cell with std's recently stabilized OnceCell/Lock and LazyCell/Lock
This doesn't get rid of the once_cell dependency, unfortunately, since we have dependencies that use it, but it's a nice to do cleanup. And when our deps will eventually get rid of once_cell we will get rid of it for free.
This doesn't get rid of the once_cell dependency, unfortunately, since we have dependencies that use it, but it's a nice to do cleanup. And when our deps will eventually get rid of once_cell we will get rid of it for free.
internal: Load VFS config changes in parallel
Simple attempt to make some progress f or https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17373
No clue if those atomic orderings are right, though I don't think they are really too relevant either.
A more complete fix would probably need to replace our `ProjectFolders` handling a bit.
