Use a u64 for the rmeta root position
Waffle noticed this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117301#discussion_r1405410174
We've upgraded the other file offsets to u64, and this one only costs 4 bytes per file. Also the way the truncation was being done before was extremely easy to miss, I sure missed it! It's not clear to me if not having this change effectively made the other upgrades from u32 to u64 ineffective, but we can have it now.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Query for nearest parent block around the hint to resolve
This way, parameter hints will be found for resolution and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/15522#issuecomment-1835896335 will be fixed
Hopefully that also helps with whatever else (lifetimes', etc.) hints in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/13962
> hints are resolved by querying for textDocument/inlayHint with hint's position turned into a [position-1, position+1] range (instead of the original, much wider document range).
>
> This might lead to issues in the future, with e.g. lifetime hints (currently there's nothing to resolve for them and it's fine) that belong to a certain position, but need to have textDocument/inlayHint query for much bigger range than their position+/-1
fix: Don't emit "missing items" diagnostic for negative impls
Negative impls can't have items, so there is no reason for this diagnostic.
LMK if I should add a test somewhere. Also LMK if that's not how we usually check multiple things in an if in r-a.
fix: Fix view mir, hir and eval function not working when cursor is inside macros
I broke the view ones completely by inverting the macro check by accident a few days ago but we don't talk about that.
detects redundant imports that can be eliminated.
for #117772 :
In order to facilitate review and modification, split the checking code and
removing redundant imports code into two PR.
Replace `doc_comments_and_attrs` with `collect_attrs`
fix#16063
I looked at the other usages of `doc_comments_and_attrs` and it seems all of them are prone to ignoring inner attributes. `@Veykril` should I replace all of those with `collect_attrs` and remove `doc_comments_and_attrs` (or even `HasDocComments`) entirely?
Fallback to method resolution on unresolved field access with matching method name
Allows typing out a method name without having to add calling parentheses to do IDE things on it. The inverse of this we already have.
feat: Prioritize import suggestions based on the expected type
Hi, this is a draft PR to solve #15384. `Adt` types work and now I have a few questions :)
1. What other types make sense in this context? Looking at [ModuleDef](05666441ba/crates/hir/src/lib.rs (L275)) I am thinking everything except Modules.
2. Is there an existing way of converting between `ModeuleDef` and `hir::Type` in the rustanalyzer code base?
3. Does this approach seem sound to you?
Ups: Upon writing this I just realised that the enum test is invalided as there are no enum variants and this no variant is passed as a function argument.
fix: resolve Self type references in delegate method assist
This PR makes the delegate method assist resolve any `Self` type references in the parameters or return type. It also works across macros such as the `uint_impl!` macro used for `saturating_mul` in the issue example.
Closes#14485
fix: Fix item tree lowering pub(self) to pub()
Prior to this, the item tree lowered `pub(self)` visibility to `pub()`
Fix#15134 - tested with a unit test and
a manual end-to-end test of building rust-analyzer from my branch and opening the reproduction repository
Before
Private functions have RawVisibility module, but were
missed because take_types returned None early. After resolve_visibility
returned None, Visibility::Public was set instead and private functions
ended up being offered in autocompletion.
Choosing such a function results in an immediate error diagnostic
about using a private function.
After
Pattern match of take_types that returns None and
query for Module-level visibility from the original_module
Fix#15134 - tested with a unit test and a manual end-to-end
test of building rust-analyzer from my branch and opening
the reproduction repository
REVIEW
Refactor to move scope_def_applicable and check function visibility
from a module
Please let me know what's the best way to add a unit tests to
nameres, which is where the root cause was
Check if lhs is also a binexpr and use its rhs in flip binexpr assist
Closes#15508
From the original PR, flip binexpr assist is not meant to preserve equivalence, so I went with the simplest solution here.
I can add some extra checks to keep equivalence, but I think they should go in different specific assists (eg. flip arith op / flip logic op / etc), otherwise this one will get out of hand pretty quickly.
