Const Compare for Tuples
Makes the impls for Tuples of ~const `PartialEq` types also `PartialEq`, impls for Tuples of ~const `PartialOrd` types also `PartialOrd`, for Tuples of ~const `Ord` types also `Ord`.
behind the `#![feature(const_cmp)]` gate.
~~Do not merge before #104113 is merged because I want to use this feature to clean up the new test that I added there.~~
r? ``@fee1-dead``
Don't intra linkcheck reference
This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).
I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.
Refactor build-manifest to minimize the number of changes needed to add a new component
- Add all components to `PkgType`
- Automate functionality wherever possible, so functions often don't have to be manually edited
- Where that's not possible, use exhaustive matches on `PkgType` instead of adding individual strings.
- Add documentation for how to add a component. Improve the existing documentation for how to test changes.
I tested locally that this generates an identical manifest before and after my change, as follows:
```sh
git checkout d44e14225ab00e164aa9ea9e8d9e1bee40f96b3e
cargo +nightly run --manifest-path src/tools/build-manifest/Cargo.toml build/dist build/manifest-before 1970-01-01 http://example.com nightly
git checkout refactor-build-manifest
cargo +nightly run --manifest-path src/tools/build-manifest/Cargo.toml build/dist build/manifest-before 1970-01-01 http://example.com nightly
sort -u build/manifest-before/channel-rust-nightly.toml | diff - <(sort -u build/manifest-after/channel-rust-nightly.toml)
```
I then verified by hand that the differences before sorting are inconsequential (mostly targets being slightly reordered).
The only change in behavior is that `llvm-tools` is now properly renamed to `llvm-tools-preview`:
```
; sort -u build/manifest-before/channel-rust-nightly.toml | diff - <(sort -u build/manifest-after/channel-rust-nightly.toml)
784a785
> [renames.llvm-tools]
894a896
> to = "llvm-tools-preview"
```
This is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102241 and should not be merged before.
Fix the length displayed for byte string literals with escaped newlines
This is a fix for the problem I reported earlier: "the length of byte strings containing escaped newlines is displayed two bytes longer when the first escaped character is a newline".
I would appreciate it if you could review the fix.
Many thanks.
Closes#13567
The length of byte strings containing escaped newlines is displayed two
bytes longer when the first escaped character is a newline.
This is due to a small bug in handling the first escaped newline in
string literals.
Closes#13567
Feat: extracted method from trait impl is placed in existing impl
**Before**
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183872883-3b0eafd2-d1dc-440e-9e66-38e3372f8b64.mp4
**After**
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183875769-87f34c7d-52f0-4dfc-9766-f591ee738ebb.mp4
Previously, when triggering a method extraction from within an impl trait block, then this would always create a new impl block for
the struct, even if there already is one. Now, if there is already an existing trait-less impl block, then it'll put the extracted method in there.
**Caveats**:
- It currently requires the target impl block to be non-empty. This limitation is because the current architecture takes a `node_to_insert_after` as reference for where to insert the extracted function. An empty impl block doesn't have such a reference node, since it's empty. It seems that supporting this requires a much larger and more complex change.
- This is my first contribution in rust, so apologies for any beginner mistakes.
Remove #![allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)] from rustc_infer
Related to #84447
This PR probably needs to be benchmarked to check for regressions.
