The new extension allows filtering of workspace symbool lookup
results by search scope or search kind.
Filtering can be configured in 3 different ways:
- The '#' or '*' markers can be added inline with the symbol lookup
query.
The '#' marker means symbols should be looked up in the current
workspace and any dependencies. If not specified, only current
workspace is considered.
The '*' marker means all kinds of symbols should be looked up
(types, functions, etc). If not specified, only type symbols are
returned.
- Each LSP request can take an optional search_scope or search_kind
argument query parameter.
- Finally there are 2 global config options that can be set for all
requests served by the active RA instance.
Add support for setting the global config options to the VSCode
extension.
The extension does not use the per-request way, but it's useful for
other IDEs.
The latest version of VSCode filters out the inline markers, so
currently the only reasonable way to use the new functionality is
via the global config.
8795: Allow semantic tokens for strings to be disabled r=matklad a=djrenren
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7111
Pretty straightforward change, but open to any suggestions if there's a more recommended testing strategy than what I went with.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
8482: Mention how to customize unsafe operation styles r=matklad a=danielzfranklin
I was confused about how to do this, so I filed #8474. I apologize for initially filing this incorrectly and spamming people.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Franklin <daniel@danielzfranklin.org>
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix#8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
Fix#8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
7891: Improve handling of rustc_private r=matklad a=DJMcNab
This PR changes how `rust-analyzer` handles `rustc_private`. In particular, packages now must opt-in to using `rustc_private` in `Cargo.toml`, by adding:
```toml
[package.metadata.rust-analyzer]
rustc_private=true
```
This means that depending on crates which also use `rustc_private` will be significantly improved, since their dependencies on the `rustc_private` crates will be resolved properly.
A similar approach could be used in #6714 to allow annotating that your package uses the `test` crate, although I have not yet handled that in this PR.
Additionally, we now only index the crates which are transitive dependencies of `rustc_driver` in the `rustcSource` directory. This should not cause any change in behaviour when using `rustcSource: "discover"`, as the source used then will only be a partial clone. However, if `rustcSource` pointing at a local checkout of rustc, this should significantly improve the memory usage and lower indexing time. This is because we avoids indexing all crates in `src/tools/`, which includes `rust-analyzer` itself.
Furthermore, we also prefer named dependencies over dependencies from `rustcSource`. This ensures that feature resolution for crates which are depended on by both `rustc` and your crate uses the correct set for analysing your crate.
See also [introductory zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0/topic/Fixed.20crate.20graphs.20and.20optional.20builtin.20crates/near/229086673)
I have tested this in [priroda](https://github.com/oli-obk/priroda/), and it provides a significant improvement to the development experience (once I give `miri` the required data in `Cargo.toml`)
Todo:
- [ ] Documentation
This is ready to review, and I will add documentation if this would be accepted (or if I get time to do so anyway)
Co-authored-by: Daniel McNab <36049421+DJMcNab@users.noreply.github.com>
