8813: Get some more array lengths! r=lf- a=lf-
This is built on #8799 and thus contains its changes. I'll rebase it onto master when that one gets merged. It adds support for r-a understanding the length of:
* `let a: [u8; 2] = ...`
* `let a = b"aaa"`
* `let a = [0u8; 4]`
I have added support for getting the values of byte strings, which was not previously there. I am least confident in the correctness of this part and it probably needs some more tests, as we currently have only one test that exercised that part (!).
Fixes#2922.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
Fix#2922: add unknown length as a condition for a type having unknown.
Incorporate reviews:
* Extract some of the const evaluation workings into functions
* Add fixmes on the hacks
* Add tests for impls on specific array lengths (these work!!! 😁)
* Add tests for const generics (indeed we don't support it yet)
8799: Add basic support for array lengths in types r=flodiebold a=lf-
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
If we get lifetime variables back in autoderef, just immediately replace
them by static lifetimes for now. Method resolution doesn't really deal
correctly with new variables being introduced (this needs to be fixed
more properly).
This fixes `rust-analyzer analysis-stats --with-deps` crashing in the RA
repo.
7907: Autoderef with visibility r=cynecx a=cynecx
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7841.
I am not sure about the general approach here. Right now this simply tries to check whether the autoderef candidate is reachable from the current module. ~~However this doesn't exactly work with traits (see the `tests::macros::infer_derive_clone_in_core` test, which fails right now).~~ see comment below
Refs:
- `rustc_typeck` checking fields: 66ec64ccf3/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs (L1610)
r? @flodiebold
Co-authored-by: cynecx <me@cynecx.net>
8134: Correct the paths of submodules from the include! macro r=edwin0cheng a=sticnarf
This PR should fix#7846. It mostly follows the instructions from @edwin0cheng in that issue.
Co-authored-by: Yilin Chen <sticnarf@gmail.com>
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which
includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid
triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the
user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc
only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also
ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type
shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if
necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
In 1.49.0, the definition of Box was modified to support an optional
Allocator[1]. Adapt the parsing of the `box` keyword to supply the
expected number of parameters to the constructor.
[1] f288cd2e17
7133: Proper handling $crate and local_inner_macros r=jonas-schievink a=edwin0cheng
This PR introduces `HygineFrames` to store the macro definition/call site hierarchy in hyginee and when resolving `local_inner_macros` and `$crate`, we use the token to look up the corresponding frame and return the correct value.
See also: https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/macro-expansion.html#hygiene-and-hierarchies
fixe #6890 and #6788
r? @jonas-schievink
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
Without arbitrary self types, the self type could never refer to the method type
parameters, so this wasn't a problem; but with arbitrary self types, it can.
This fixes the crash from #6668; but it doesn't make method resolution work for
these methods.
