fix: Ambiguity with CamelCase diagnostic messages, align with rustc warnings
Fixed diagnostic messages so they say UpperCamelCase rather than CamelCase, as it is ambiguous.
Usually I'd call it PascalCase, but in the code base it is called UpperCamelCase so I left it with that naming choice.
`rustc` says `upper camel case` also when the case is wrong
```
warning: trait `testThing` should have an upper camel case name
--> src/main.rs:5:7
|
5 | trait testThing {
| ^^^^^^^^^ help: convert the identifier to upper camel case: `TestThing`
|
= note: `#[warn(non_camel_case_types)]` on by default
```
This is in line with the UPPER_SNAKE_CASE diagnostic messages.
546339a7be/crates/hir-ty/src/diagnostics/decl_check.rs (L60)546339a7be/crates/ide-diagnostics/src/handlers/incorrect_case.rs (L535)
fix: Extend `type_variable_table` when modifying index is larger than the table size
Fixes#18109
Whenever we create an inference variable in r-a, we extend `type_variable_table` to matching size here;
f4aca78c92/crates/hir-ty/src/infer/unify.rs (L378-L381)
But sometimes, an inference variable is [created from chalk](ab710e0c9b/chalk-solve/src/infer/unify.rs (L743)) and passed to r-a as a type of an expression or a pattern.
If r-a set diverging flag to this before the table is extended to a sufficient size, it panics here;
f4aca78c92/crates/hir-ty/src/infer/unify.rs (L275-L277)
I think that extending table when setting diverging flag is reasonable becase we are already doing such extending to a size that covers the inference vars created from chalk and this change only covers the order-dependent random cases that this might fail
Don't lint names of #[no_mangle] extern fns
[Rust doesn't run the `non_snake_case_name` lint on `extern fn`s with the `#[no_mangle]` attribute](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44966).
The conditions are:
- The function must be `extern` and have a `#[no_mangle]` attribute.
- The function's ABI must not be explicitly set to "Rust".
This PR replicates that logic here.
Use more correct handling of lint attributes
The previous analysis was top-down, and worked on a single file (expanding macros). The new analysis is bottom-up, starting from the diagnostics and climbing up the syntax and module tree.
While this is more efficient (and in fact, efficiency was the motivating reason to work on this), unfortunately the code was already fast enough. But luckily, it also fixes a correctness problem: outline parent modules' attributes were not respected for the previous analysis. Case lints specifically did their own analysis to accommodate that, but it was limited to only them. The new analysis works on all kinds of lints, present and future.
It was basically impossible to fix the old analysis without rewriting it because navigating the module hierarchy must come bottom-up, and if we already have a bottom-up analysis (including syntax analysis because modules can be nested in other syntax elements, including macros), it makes sense to use only this kind of analysis.
Few other bugs (not fundamental to the previous analysis) are also fixed, e.g. overwriting of lint levels (i.e. `#[allow(lint)] mod foo { #[warn(lint)] mod bar; }`.
After this PR is merged I intend to work on an editor command that does workspace-wide diagnostics analysis (that is, `rust-analyzer diagnostics` but from your editor and without having to spawn a new process, which will have to analyze the workspace from scratch). This can be useful to users who do not want to enable check on save because of its overhead, but want to see workspace wide diagnostics from r-a (or to maintainers of rust-analyzer).
Closes#18086.
Closes#18081.
Fixes#18056.
The previous analysis was top-down, and worked on a single file (expanding macros). The new analysis is bottom-up, starting from the diagnostics and climbing up the syntax and module tree.
While this is more efficient (and in fact, efficiency was the motivating reason to work on this), unfortunately the code was already fast enough. But luckily, it also fixes a correctness problem: outline parent modules' attributes were not respected for the previous analysis. Case lints specifically did their own analysis to accommodate that, but it was limited to only them. The new analysis works on all kinds of lints, present and future.
It was basically impossible to fix the old analysis without rewriting it because navigating the module hierarchy must come bottom-up, and if we already have a bottom-up analysis (including syntax analysis because modules can be nested in other syntax elements, including macros), it makes sense to use only this kind of analysis.
Few other bugs (not fundamental ti the previous analysis) are also fixed, e.g. overwriting of lint levels (i.e. `#[allow(lint)] mod foo { #[warn(lint)] mod bar; }`.
Do not report missing unsafe on `addr_of[_mut]!(EXTERN_OR_MUT_STATIC)`
The compiler no longer does as well; see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125834.
Also require unsafe when accessing `extern` `static` (other than by `addr_of!()`).
Fixes#17978.
feat: Create an assist to convert closure to freestanding fn
The assist converts all captures to parameters.
Closes#17920.
This was more work than I though, since it has to handle a bunch of edge cases...
Based on #17941. Needs to merge it first.
Expand proc-macros in workspace root, not package root
Should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17748. The approach is generally not perfect though as rust-project.json projects don't benefit from this (still, nothing changes in that regard)
Always show error lifetime arguments as `'_`
Fixes#17947
Changed error lifetime argument presentation in non-test environment to `'_` and now showing them even if all of args are error lifetimes.
This also influenced some of the other tests like `extract_function.rs`, `predicate.rs` and `type_pos.rs`. Not sure whether I need to refrain from adding lifetimes args there. Happy to fix if needed
