When receiving multiple change events for a single file id where the
last change is a delete the server panics, as it tries to access the
file contents of a deleted file. This occurs due to the VFS changes and
the in memory file contents being updated immediately, while
`process_changes` processes the events afterwards in sequence which no
longer works as it will only observe the final file contents. By
folding these events together, we will no longer try to process these
intermediate changes, as they aren't relevant anyways.
Potentially fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/13236
Feature: Add assist to unwrap tuple declarations
> Implement #12923 for only tuples.
>
> Does not implement unwrapping for structs, as mentioned in the issue.
Add assist to unwrap tuples declarations to separate declarations.
```rust
fn main() {
$0let (foo, bar, baz) = (1.0, "example", String::new())
}
```
becomes:
```rust
fn main() {
let foo = 1.0;
let bar = "example";
let baz = String::new();
}
```
## Changelog
### Feature
- Added assist to unwrap tuple declarations.
feat: type inference for generators
This PR implements basic type inference for generator and yield expressions.
Things not included in this PR:
- Generator upvars and generator witnesses are not implemented. They are only used to determine auto trait impls, so basic type inference should be fine without them, but method resolutions with auto trait bounds may not be resolved correctly.
Open questions:
- I haven't (yet) implemented `HirDisplay` for `TyKind::Generator`, so generator types are just shown as "{{generator}}" (in tests, inlay hints, hovers, etc.), which is not really nice. How should we show them?
- I added moderate amount of stuffs to minicore. I especially didn't want to add `impl<T> Deref for &T` and `impl<T> Deref for &mut T` exclusively for tests for generators; should I move them into the test fixtures or can they be placed in minicore?
cc #4309
Don't drop parent substs when we have no generic parameters in `create_substs_for_ast_path`
This bug is being shadowed by an explicit check for `generics.params.is_empty()` in the only parent caller that could trigger it (`create_substs_for_associated_item`). I triggered it on another branch where I'm messing around with astconv stuff.
Also, the second commit simplifies `create_substs_for_associated_item`. Removing that explicit check I mentioned above^ and also the special case call to `Astconv::prohibit_generics` causes the UI test `src/test/ui/structs/struct-path-associated-type.stderr` to change, but I think that it's clearer now. The suggestion to remove the generics is actually useful.
Make ZST checks in core/alloc more readable
There's a bunch of these checks because of special handing for ZSTs in various unsafe implementations of stuff.
This lets them be `T::IS_ZST` instead of `mem::size_of::<T>() == 0` every time, making them both more readable and more terse.
*Not* proposed for stabilization. Would be `pub(crate)` except `alloc` wants to use it too.
(And while it doesn't matter now, if we ever get something like #85836 making it a const can help codegen be simpler.)
Distribute bootstrap in CI
This pre-compiles bootstrap from source and adds it to the existing `rust-dev` component. There are two main goals here:
1. Make it faster to build rust from source, both the first time and incrementally
2. Make it easier to add non-python entrypoints, since they can call out to bootstrap directly rather than having to figure out the right flags to pre-compile it. This second part is still in a bit of flux, see the tracking issue below for more information.
There are also several changes to make bootstrap able to run on a machine other than the one it was built (particularly around `config.src` and `config.out` detection). I (`@jyn514)` am slightly concerned these will regress unless tested - maybe we should add an automated test that runs bootstrap in a chroot or something? Unclear whether the effort is worth the test coverage.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94829.
Use internal iteration in `Iterator` comparison methods
Updates the `Iterator` methods `cmp_by`, `partial_cmp_by`, and `eq_by` to use internal iteration on `self`. I've also extracted their shared logic into a private helper function `iter_compare`, which will either short-circuit once the comparison result is known or return the comparison of the lengths of the iterators.
This change also indirectly benefits calls to `cmp`, `partial_cmp`, `eq`, `lt`, `le`, `gt`, and `ge`.
Unsurprising benchmark results: iterators that benefit from internal iteration (like `Chain`) see a speedup, while other iterators are unaffected.
```
name before ns/iter after ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
iter::bench_chain_partial_cmp 208,301 54,978 -153,323 -73.61% x 3.79
iter::bench_partial_cmp 55,527 55,702 175 0.32% x 1.00
iter::bench_lt 55,502 55,322 -180 -0.32% x 1.00
```
Don't run proc-macro-srv tests on the rust-analyzer repo
proc-macro ABI breakage still affects the tests when a new stable version releases. Ideally we'd still be able to run the tests on the rust-analyzer repo without having to update the proc-macro ABI, but for now just to unblock CI we will ignore them here, as they are still run in upstream.
proc-macro ABI breakage still affects the tests when a new stable version
releases. Ideally we'd still be able to run the tests on the rust-analyzer
repo without having to update the proc-macro ABI, but for now just to
unblock CI we will ignore them here, as they are still run in upstream.
Allow full relro on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
This was previously limited to partial relro, citing issues on RHEL6,
but that's no longer a supported platform since #95026. We have long
been enabling full relro in RHEL7's own Rust builds for ppc64, without
trouble, so it should be fine to drop this workaround.
Distribute rust-docs-json via rustup.
I am not 100% sure on how to treat `rust-json-docs` in `target_host_combination`. I went along with a similar strategy to the one used for `rust-docs`, but looking for guidance there.
Migrated the rustc_passes annotation without effect diagnostic infrastructure
Small change to move the validation for annotations to the new diagnostic infrastructure.
Note if mismatched types have a similar name
If users get a type error between similarly named types, it will point out that these are actually different types, and where they were defined.
Inline SyntaxContext in both encoded span representation.
The current interned representation for spans does not use the `ctxt_or_zero: u16` field. This PR proposes to use this field to store the `SyntaxContext` of the interned span instead. When `ctxt_or_zero` and the interned span's `ctxt` don't match, the inlined one takes precedence.
This allows to implement `Span::ctxt` and `Span::with_ctxt` with much less probability to access the interner. Those functions are used a lot for hygiene, so this may be worth it.
use partition_point instead of binary_search when looking up source lines
In local benchmarks this results in 0.4% fewer cycles in a critical sequential section when compiling libcore.
Add armv5te-none-eabi and thumbv5te-none-eabi targets
Creates two new Tier 3 targets, `armv5te-none-eabi` and `thumbv5te-none-eabi`. They are for the same target architecture (armv5te), but one defaults to the A32 instruction set and the other defaults to T32. Based on the existing `armv4t-none-eabi` and `thumbv4t-none-eabi` targets.
My particular use case for these targets is Nintendo DS homebrew, but they should be usable for any armv5te system.
Going through the Tier 3 target policy:
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
That will be me.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets.
Naming is consistent with previous targets.
>> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility.
No ambiguity here.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
Doesn't create any legal issues.
>> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
This doesn't introduce any new licenses.
>> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Yep.
>> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
No new license requirements.
>> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
Everything this uses is FOSS, no proprietary required.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
OK.
>> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
OK.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This is a bare-metal target with only support for `core` (and `alloc`, if the user provides an allocator).
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Documentation has been added.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
OK.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
OK.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
This doesn't break any other targets.
>> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
No unnecessary unconditional features here.
a fn pointer doesn't implement `Fn`/`FnMut`/`FnOnce` if its return type isn't sized
I stumbled upon #83915 which hasn't received much attention recently, and I wanted to revive it since this is one existing soundness hole that seems pretty easy to fix.
I'm not actually sure that the [alternative approach described here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83915#issuecomment-823643322) is sufficient, given the `src/test/ui/function-pointer/unsized-ret.rs` example I provided below. Rebasing the branch mentioned in that comment and testing that UI test, it seems that we actually end up only observing that `str: !Sized` during monomorphization, whereupon we ICE. Even if we were to fix that ICE, ideally we'd be raising an error that a fn pointer is being used badly during _typecheck_ instead of monomorphization, hence adapting the original approach in #83915.
I am happy to close this if people would prefer we rebase the original PR and land that -- I am partly opening to be annoying and get people thinking about this unsoundness again ❤️😸
cc: `@estebank` and `@nikomatsakis`
r? types
Here's a link to the thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/144729-t-types/topic/PR.20.2383915/near/235421351 for more context.
Optimize `array::IntoIter`
`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.
This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.
I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.
(`vec::IntoIter` uses pointers instead of indexes, so doesn't have this problem, but that only works because its elements are boxed. `array::IntoIter` can't use pointers because that would keep it from being movable.)
std: use `sync::RwLock` for internal statics
Since `sync::RwLock` is now `const`-constructible, it can be used for internal statics, removing the need for `sys_common::StaticRwLock`. This adds some extra allocations on platforms which need to box their locks (currently SGX and some UNIX), but these will become unnecessary with the lock improvements tracked in #93740.
