4534: Add call postfix completion r=matklad a=vain0x
To make it easier to wrap an expression with Ok/Some/Rc::new etc.
Note I agree with conclusion of the discussion in #1431 that adding many completions is not the way to go. However, this PR still could be justified due to versatility of use.
Co-authored-by: vain0x <vainzerox@gmail.com>
The line separator is moved below the function signature to split
regions between the docs. This is very similar to how IntelliJ
displays tooltips. Adding an additional separator between the module
name and function signature currently has rendering issues.
Fixes#4594
Alternative to #4615
4602: Add boolean literal semantic token type to package.json r=matklad a=lnicola
Closes#4583.
CC @GrayJack
4603: Add self keyword semantic token type r=matklad a=lnicola
Not sure if this is warranted a new token type or just a modifier.
---
CC #4583, @GrayJack
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
* Done at line 243: "Add validation of `crate` keyword not appearing in the middle of the symbol path"
* Already happened: "Remove validation of unterminated literals (it is already implemented in `tokenize()`)"
* Happens in `unescape()`: "Add validation of character literal containing only a single char"
* Missing: "raw string literals and raw byte string literals"
4555: VSCode: added patchelf after download for NixOS support r=matklad a=cab404
This adds Nix support, and fixes#4542
4575: Use Chalk's built-in representations for fn items and pointers r=matklad a=flodiebold
The `TypeName::FnDef` was just added; the function pointer variant has existed for a while, I just forgot about it because it's special (because fn pointers can be higher-ranked over lifetimes).
We *could* also make `FnPtr` a separate `Ty` variant instead of a `TypeCtor` variant, which would make the conversion code a bit less special-casey, but it doesn't seem worth doing right now.
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Serov <me@cab404.ru>
Co-authored-by: Cabia Rangris <me@cab404.ru>
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
Function pointers can be 'higher-ranked' over lifetimes, which is why they're
not an application type in Chalk, but since we don't model lifetimes it doesn't
matter for us yet.
4570: Use Chalk's built-in impls r=matklad a=flodiebold
This contains two changes:
- Chalk has begun adding built-in representations of primitive types; use these in our type conversion logic. There's one somewhat 'iffy' part here, namely references; we don't keep track of lifetimes, but Chalk does, so it will expect a lifetime parameter on references. If we didn't provide that, it could cause crashes in Chalk code that expects the lifetime, so I rather hackily add an (always the same) lifetime placeholder during conversion. I expect that we'll fully switch to using Chalk's types everywhere before we add lifetime support, so I think this is the best solution for now.
- let Chalk know about well-known traits (from lang items), so it can apply its built-in impls.
Before:
```
Total expressions: 181485
Expressions of unknown type: 2940 (1%)
Expressions of partially unknown type: 2884 (1%)
Type mismatches: 901
Inference: 37.821210245s, 0b allocated 0b resident
Total: 53.399467609s, 0b allocated 0b resident
```
After:
```
Total expressions: 181485
Expressions of unknown type: 2923 (1%)
Expressions of partially unknown type: 2879 (1%)
Type mismatches: 734
Inference: 39.157752509s, 0b allocated 0b resident
Total: 54.110767621s, 0b allocated 0b resident
```
(I will start splitting up `chalk.rs` in a separate PR, since it's getting pretty big...)
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
4571: KISS SourceChange r=matklad a=matklad
The idea behind requiring the label is a noble one, but we are not
really using it consistently anyway, and it should be easy to retrofit
later, should we need it.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
The idea behind requiring the label is a noble one, but we are not
really using it consistently anyway, and it should be easy to retrofit
later, should we need it.
4516: LSP: Two stage initialization r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
Fills in server information.
Derives CodeAction capabilities from the client. If code action literals
are unsupported we fall back to the "simple support" which just sends back
commands (this is already supported in our config). The difference being
that we did not adjust our server capabilities so that if the client was
checking for `CodeActionProvider: "true"` in the response that would have failed.
Part of #144Fixes#4130 (the specific case called out in that issue)
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
