3262: Fix handling of const patterns r=matklad a=flodiebold
E.g. in `match x { None => ... }`, `None` is a path pattern (resolving to the
option variant), not a binding. To determine this, we need to try to resolve the
name during lowering. This isn't too hard since we already need to resolve names
for macro expansion anyway (though maybe a bit hacky).
Fixes#1618.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
E.g. in `match x { None => ... }`, `None` is a path pattern (resolving to the
option variant), not a binding. To determine this, we need to try to resolve the
name during lowering. This isn't too hard since we already need to resolve names
for macro expansion anyway (though maybe a bit hacky).
Fixes#1618.
3228: Use proper range for hover on macro arguments r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR use `original_range` to remap the range of found syntax node in `hover` and thus it should return the proper text range now.
fixed#3000fixed#3135
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3026: ra_syntax: reshape SyntaxError for the sake of removing redundancy r=matklad a=Veetaha
Followup of #2911, also puts some crosses to the todo list of #223.
**AHTUNG!** A big part of the diff of this PR are test data files changes.
Simplified `SyntaxError` that was `SyntaxError { kind: { /* big enum */ }, location: Location }` to `SyntaxError(String, TextRange)`. I am not sure whether the tuple struct here is best fit, I am inclined to add names to the fields, because I already provide getters `SyntaxError::message()`, `SyntaxError::range()`.
I also removed `Location` altogether ...
This is currently WIP, because the following is not done:
- [ ] ~~Add tests to `test_data` dir for unescape errors *// I don't know where to put these errors in particular, because they are out of the scope of the lexer and parser. However, I have an idea in mind that we move all validators we have right now to parsing stage, but this is up to discussion...*~~ **[UPD]** I came to a conclusion that tree validation logic, which unescape errors are a part of, should be rethought of, we currently have no tests and no place to put tests for tree validations. So I'd like to extract potential redesign (maybe move of tree validation to ra_parser) and adding tests for this into a separate task.
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <gerzoh1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
