4329: Look for `cargo`, `rustc`, and `rustup` in standard installation path r=matklad a=cdisselkoen
Discussed in #3118. This is approximately a 90% fix for the issue described there.
This PR creates a new crate `ra_env` with a function `get_path_for_executable()`; see docs there. `get_path_for_executable()` improves and generalizes the function `cargo_binary()` which was previously duplicated in the `ra_project_model` and `ra_flycheck` crates. (Both of those crates now depend on the new `ra_env` crate.) The new function checks (e.g.) `$CARGO` and `$PATH`, but also falls back on `~/.cargo/bin` manually before erroring out. This should allow most users to not have to worry about setting the `$CARGO` or `$PATH` variables for VSCode, which can be difficult e.g. on macOS as discussed in #3118.
I've attempted to replace all calls to `cargo`, `rustc`, and `rustup` in rust-analyzer with appropriate invocations of `get_path_for_executable()`; I don't think I've missed any in Rust code, but there is at least one invocation in TypeScript code which I haven't fixed. (I'm not sure whether it's affected by the same problem or not.) a4778ddb7a/editors/code/src/cargo.ts (L79)
I'm sure this PR could be improved a bunch, so I'm happy to take feedback/suggestions on how to solve this problem better, or just bikeshedding variable/function/crate names etc.
cc @Veetaha
Fixes#3118.
Co-authored-by: Craig Disselkoen <craigdissel@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
4166: Defining a default target to support cross-compilation targets r=matklad a=FuriouZz
Related to #4163
Co-authored-by: Christophe MASSOLIN <christophe.massolin@gmail.com>
The `workspaceLoaded` notification setting was originally designed to
control the display of a popup message that said:
"workspace loaded, {} rust packages"
This popup was removed and replaced by a much sleeker message in the
VSCode status bar that provides a real-time status while loading:
rust-analyzer: {}/{} packages
This was done as part of #3587
The new status-bar indicator is unobtrusive and shouldn't need to be
disabled. So this setting is removed.
4222: Introduce C/C++ for Visual Studio Code extension as an alternative debug engine for Debug Code lens. r=matklad a=vsrs
At the moment Debug Code Lens can use only one debug engine: lldb via [CodeLLDB](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=vadimcn.vscode-lldb) extension.
This PR adds support of the debug engine from the [MS C++ tools](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-vscode.cpptools) extension, as well as the configuration option. If both extensions are installed, `CodeLLDB` will be used by default.
Another new option `rust-analyzer.debug.sourceFileMap` allows, for example, to step into Rust std library during debugging. Works only with `MS C++ tools`.
On Windows:
```json
"rust-analyzer.debug.sourceFileMap": {
"/rustc/4fb7144ed159f94491249e86d5bbd033b5d60550": "${env:USERPROFILE}/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc/lib/rustlib/src/rust"
}
```
On Linux:
```json
"rust-analyzer.debug.sourceFileMap": {
"/rustc/4fb7144ed159f94491249e86d5bbd033b5d60550": "~/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust"
}
```
Co-authored-by: vsrs <vit@conrlab.com>
3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Additional feature for #3639
- [x] Add tests for paths with more segments
- [x] Make generating the function in another file work
- [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module
- [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file
- [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper
4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup
I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`.
The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct.
The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions.
There are a few places which I am not quite sure:
- Is the way I extract the macro names correct?
- Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`?
Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome!
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <ltentrup@users.noreply.github.com>
