7145: Proper handling $crate Take 2 [DO NOT MERGE] r=edwin0cheng a=edwin0cheng
Similar to previous PR (#7133) , but improved the following things :
1. Instead of storing the whole `ExpansionInfo`, we store a similar but stripped version `HygieneInfo`.
2. Instread of storing the `SyntaxNode` (because every token we are interested are IDENT), we store the `TextRange` only.
3. Because of 2, we now can put it in Salsa.
4. And most important improvement: Instead of computing the whole frames every single time, we compute it recursively through salsa: (Such that in the best scenario, we only need to compute the first layer of frame)
```rust
let def_site = db.hygiene_frame(info.def.file_id);
let call_site = db.hygiene_frame(info.arg.file_id);
HygieneFrame { expansion: Some(info), local_inner, krate, call_site, def_site }
```
The overall speed compared to previous PR is much faster (65s vs 45s) :
```
[WITH old PR]
Database loaded 644.86ms, 284mi
Crates in this dir: 36
Total modules found: 576
Total declarations: 11153
Total functions: 8715
Item Collection: 15.78s, 91562mi
Total expressions: 240721
Expressions of unknown type: 2635 (1%)
Expressions of partially unknown type: 2064 (0%)
Type mismatches: 865
Inference: 49.84s, 250747mi
Total: 65.62s, 342310mi
rust-analyzer -q analysis-stats . 66.72s user 0.57s system 99% cpu 1:07.40 total
[WITH this PR]
Database loaded 665.83ms, 284mi
Crates in this dir: 36
Total modules found: 577
Total declarations: 11188
Total functions: 8743
Item Collection: 15.28s, 84919mi
Total expressions: 241229
Expressions of unknown type: 2637 (1%)
Expressions of partially unknown type: 2064 (0%)
Type mismatches: 868
Inference: 30.15s, 135293mi
Total: 45.43s, 220213mi
rust-analyzer -q analysis-stats . 46.26s user 0.74s system 99% cpu 47.294 total
```
*HOWEVER*, it is still a perf regression (35s vs 45s):
```
[WITHOUT this PR]
Database loaded 657.42ms, 284mi
Crates in this dir: 36
Total modules found: 577
Total declarations: 11177
Total functions: 8735
Item Collection: 12.87s, 72407mi
Total expressions: 239380
Expressions of unknown type: 2643 (1%)
Expressions of partially unknown type: 2064 (0%)
Type mismatches: 868
Inference: 22.88s, 97889mi
Total: 35.74s, 170297mi
rust-analyzer -q analysis-stats . 36.71s user 0.63s system 99% cpu 37.498 total
```
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
This is done by adding a `ret_type` method to `hir::Function`.
I followed `assoc_fn_params` convention by creating a new `RetType` type,
that contains the actual return type accessible via a `ty` method.
7068: Add VSCode command to view the hir of a function body r=theotherphil a=theotherphil
Will fix https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7061. Very rough initial version just to work out where I needed to wire everything up.
@matklad would you be happy merging a hir visualiser of some kind? If so, do you have any thoughts on what you'd like it show, and how?
I've spent very little time on this thus far, so I'm fine with throwing away the contents of this PR, but I want to avoid taking the time to make this more polished/interactive/useful only to discover that no-one else has any interest in this functionality.
Co-authored-by: Phil Ellison <phil.j.ellison@gmail.com>
7115: Migrate HasSource::source to return Option r=matklad a=nick96
I've made a start on fixing #6913 based on the provided work plan, migrating `HasSource::source` to return an `Option`. The simple cases are migrated but there are a few that I'm unsure exactly how they should be handled:
- Logging the processing of functions in `AnalysisStatsCmd::run`: In verbose mode it includes the path to the module containing the function and the syntax range. I've handled this with an if-let but would it be better to blow up here with `expect`? I'm not 100% on the code paths but if we're processing a function definition then the source should exist.
I've handled `source()` in all code paths as `None` being a valid return value but are there some cases where we should just blow up? Also, all I've done is bubble up the returned `None`s, there may be some places where we can recover and still provide something.
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <nicholas.spain@stileeducation.com>
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <nicholas.spain96@gmail.com>
In #6901 some special case handling for proc-macros was introduced to
prevent panicing as they have no AST. Now the new HasSource::source
method is used that returns an option.
Generally this was a pretty trivial change, the only thing of much
interest is that `hir::MacroDef` now implements `TryToNav` not `ToNav`
as this allows us to handle `HasSource::source` now returning an option.
6964: Add full pattern completions for Struct and Variant patterns r=matklad a=Veykril
Just gonna call it full pattern completion as pattern completion is already implemented in a sense by showing idents in pattern position. What this does is basically complete struct and variant patterns where applicable(function params, let statements and refutable pattern locations).
This does not replace just completing the corresponding idents of the structs and variants, instead two completions are shown for these, a completion for the ident itself and a completion for the pattern(if the pattern make sense to be used that is). I figured in some cases one would rather type out the pattern manually if it has a lot of fields but you only care about one since this completion would cause one more work in the end since you would have to delete all the extra matched fields again.
These completions are tagged as `CompletionKind::Snippet`, not sure if that is the right one here.
<details>
<summary>some gifs</summary>
</details>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6921: Higher-ranked trait bounds for where clauses r=flodiebold a=Veykril
There is a slight problem with this which is also noted in a FIXME now but `LifetimeParameters` of these ForLifetime where clauses allocate the lifetimes in the corresponding arena as if they were lifetimes of the item itself and not just the clause they belong to. I wasn't entirely sure what I could do about this but given nothing really uses lifetimes like that currently I figured it might be fine? Open to suggestions for that problem.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6901: Temp fixes panic caused by no ast for proc-macro r=maklad a=edwin0cheng
There are some panic when hover/goto definition for proc-macro. It is because in current design, we don't have `ast-node` for proc-macro and then it trigger [this](479d1f7eec/crates/hir/src/has_source.rs (L116)) line to panic.
This PR is a temp fix for all of these similar to bd4c352831/crates/completion/src/render/macro_.rs (L42)
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
We used to have `Def` suffix for all symbols, but we moved off from
that. `FunctionDef` isn't better than `Function`. Looks like we've
forgot to change `Impl` though!
6896: Node-ify lifetimes r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Let's see if this passes the tests 🤞
Depends on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/15
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6897: Basic support for macros 2.0 r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This adds support for (built-in-only) macros 2.0, and removes some hacks used for builtin derives, which are declared via macros 2.0 in libcore.
First steps for https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/2248.
Blocked on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/16.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
