Rename `checkOnSave` settings to `check`
Now that flychecks can be triggered without saving the setting name doesn't make that much sense anymore. This PR renames it to just `check`, but keeps `checkOnSave` as the enabling setting.
feat: add the ability to limit the number of threads launched by `main_loop`
## Motivation
`main_loop` defaults to launch as many threads as cpus in one machine. When developing on multi-core remote servers on multiple projects, this will lead to thousands of idle threads being created. This is very annoying when one wants check whether his program under developing is running correctly via `htop`.
<img width="756" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/41831480/206656419-fa3f0dd2-e554-4f36-be1b-29d54739930c.png">
## Contribution
This patch introduce the configuration option `rust-analyzer.numThreads` to set the desired thread number used by the main thread pool.
This should have no effects on the performance as not all threads are actually used.
<img width="1325" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/41831480/206656834-fe625c4c-b993-4771-8a82-7427c297fd41.png">
## Demonstration
The following is a snippet of `lunarvim` configuration using my own build.
```lua
vim.list_extend(lvim.lsp.automatic_configuration.skipped_servers, { "rust_analyzer" })
require("lvim.lsp.manager").setup("rust_analyzer", {
cmd = { "env", "RA_LOG=debug", "RA_LOG_FILE=/tmp/ra-test.log",
"/home/jlhu/Projects/rust-analyzer/target/debug/rust-analyzer",
},
init_options = {
numThreads = 4,
},
settings = {
cachePriming = {
numThreads = 8,
},
},
})
```
## Limitations
The `numThreads` can only be modified via `initializationOptions` in early initialisation because everything has to wait until the thread pool starts including the dynamic settings modification support.
The `numThreads` also does not reflect the end results of how many threads is actually created, because I have not yet tracked down everything that spawns threads.
feat: Add an option to hide adjustment hints outside of `unsafe` blocks and functions
As the title suggests: this PR adds an option (namely `rust-analyzer.inlayHints.expressionAdjustmentHints.hideOutsideUnsafe`) that allows to hide adjustment hints outside of `unsafe` blocks and functions:
Requested by `@BoxyUwU` <3
feat: add config for inserting must_use in `generate_enum_as_method`
Should fix#13312
Didn't add a test because I was not sure on how to add test for a specific configuration option, tried to look for the usages for other `AssistConfig` variants but couldn't find any in `tests`. If there is a way to test this, do point me towards it.
I tried to extract the formatting string as a common `template_string` and only have if-else for that, but it didn't compile :(
Also it seems these tests are failing:
```
test config::tests::generate_config_documentation ... FAILED
test config::tests::generate_package_json_config ... FAILED
```
Can you also point me to how to correct these 😅 ( I guess there is some command to automatically generate these? )
Add a new configuration settings to set env vars when running cargo, rustc, etc. commands: cargo.extraEnv and checkOnSave.extraEnv
It can be extremely useful to be able to set environment variables when rust-analyzer is running various cargo or rustc commands (such as `cargo check`, `cargo --print cfg` or `cargo metadata`): users may want to set custom `RUSTFLAGS`, change `PATH` to use a custom toolchain or set a different `CARGO_HOME`.
There is the existing `server.extraEnv` setting that allows env vars to be set when the rust-analyzer server is launched, but using this as the recommended mechanism to also configure cargo/rust has some drawbacks:
- It convolutes configuring the rust-analyzer server with configuring cargo/rustc (one may want to change the `PATH` for cargo/rustc without affecting the rust-analyzer server).
- The name `server.extraEnv` doesn't indicate that cargo/rustc will be affected but renaming it to `cargo.extraEnv` doesn't indicate that the rust-analyzer server would be affected.
- To make the setting useful, it needs to be dynamically reloaded without requiring that the entire extension is reloaded. It might be possible to do this, but it would require the client communicating to the server what the overwritten env vars were at first launch, which isn't easy to do.
This change adds two new configuration settings: `cargo.extraEnv` and `checkOnSave.extraEnv` that can be used to change the environment for the rust-analyzer server after launch (thus affecting any process that rust-analyzer invokes) and the `cargo check` command respectively. `cargo.extraEnv` supports dynamic changes by keeping track of the pre-change values of environment variables, thus it can undo changes made previously before applying the new configuration (and then requesting a workspace reload).
Allow configuration of annotation location.
I've added the ability to configure where lens annotations render relevant to the item they describe. Previously, these would render directly above the line the item is declared on. Now, there is the ability to render these annotations above the entire item (including doc comments, and attributes).
The names of the config options are up for debate, I did what seemed best to me but if anyone has better ideas let me know.
This is my first contribution so if I've missed anything please let me know.
Here's a preview of what the new option looks like:
<img width="577" alt="Screen Shot 2022-09-11 at 10 39 51 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33100798/189570298-b4fcbf9c-ee49-4b79-aae6-1037ae4f26af.png">
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/13218
Previously, annotations would only appear above the name of an item (function signature, struct declaration, etc).
Now, rust-analyzer can be configured to show annotations either above the name or above the whole item (including doc comments and attributes).
Config revamp
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/11790
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12115
This PR changes a lot of config names, and a few ones are being merged or split apart. The reason for this is that our configuration names currently are rather inconsistent and some where poorly chosen in regards to extensability. This PR plans to fix that.
We still allow the old config names by patching them to the new ones before deserializing to keep backwards compatability with other clients (the VSCode client will auto update the config) but ideally we will get rid of that layer in the future.
Here is a list of the changes:
These are simple renames `old_name | alias1 | alias2 ... -> new_name` (the vscode client will fix these up automagically):
```
assist_allowMergingIntoGlobImports -> imports_merge_glob
assist_exprFillDefault -> assist_expressionFillDefault
assist_importEnforceGranularity -> imports_granularity_enforce
assist_importGranularity | assist_importMergeBehavior | assist_importMergeBehaviour -> imports_granularity_group
assist_importGroup -> imports_group_enable
assist_importPrefix -> imports_prefix
cache_warmup -> primeCaches_enable
cargo_loadOutDirsFromCheck -> cargo_buildScripts_enable
cargo_runBuildScripts | cargo_runBuildScriptsCommand -> cargo_runBuildScripts_overrideCommand
cargo_useRustcWrapperForBuildScripts -> cargo_runBuildScripts_useRustcWrapper
completion_snippets -> completion_snippets_custom
diagnostics_enableExperimental -> diagnostics_experimental_enable
experimental_procAttrMacros -> procMacro_attributes_enable
highlighting_strings -> semanticHighlighting_strings_enable
highlightRelated_breakPoints -> semanticHighlighting_breakPoints_enable
highlightRelated_exitPoints -> semanticHighlighting_exitPoints_enable
highlightRelated_yieldPoints -> semanticHighlighting_yieldPoints_enable
highlightRelated_references -> semanticHighlighting_references_enable
hover_documentation -> hover_documentation_enable
hover_linksInHover | hoverActions_linksInHover -> hover_links_enable
hoverActions_debug -> hoverActions_debug_enable
hoverActions_enable -> hoverActions_enable_enable
hoverActions_gotoTypeDef -> hoverActions_gotoTypeDef_enable
hoverActions_implementations -> hoverActions_implementations_enable
hoverActions_references -> hoverActions_references_enable
hoverActions_run -> hoverActions_run_enable
inlayHints_chainingHints -> inlayHints_chainingHints_enable
inlayHints_closureReturnTypeHints -> inlayHints_closureReturnTypeHints_enable
inlayHints_hideNamedConstructorHints -> inlayHints_typeHints_hideNamedConstructorHints
inlayHints_parameterHints -> inlayHints_parameterHints_enable
inlayHints_reborrowHints -> inlayHints_reborrowHints_enable
inlayHints_typeHints -> inlayHints_typeHints_enable
lruCapacity -> lru_capacity
runnables_cargoExtraArgs -> runnables_extraArgs
runnables_overrideCargo -> runnables_command
rustcSource -> rustc_source
rustfmt_enableRangeFormatting -> rustfmt_rangeFormatting_enable
```
These are configs that have been merged or split apart, which have to be manually updated by the user:
```
callInfo_full -> signatureInfo_detail, signatureInfo_documentation_enable
cargo_allFeatures, cargo_features -> cargo_features
checkOnSave_allFeatures, checkOnSave_features -> checkOnSave_features
completion_addCallArgumentSnippets completion_addCallParenthesis -> completion_callable_snippets
```
10802: Allow clients to configure the global workspace search limit r=Veykril a=knutwalker
Playing around with [helix](https://helix-editor.com) I realized that the global worksapce symbol search works different compared to vs-code.
Helix requires all possible symbols in one query and does no subsequent refinement searched.
This PR adds a configuration option to override the default search limit with the default being the currently hardocded value.
Helix users can increment this limit for their instance with a config like
```toml
[[language]]
name = "rust"
language-server = { command = "rust-analyzer" }
[language.config]
workspace = { symbol = { search = { limit = 65536 }}}
```
Other editors are not affected by this change.
Co-authored-by: Paul Horn <dev@knutwalker.engineer>
11145: feat: add config to use reasonable default expression instead of todo! when filling missing fields r=Veykril a=bnjjj
Use `Default::default()` in struct fields when we ask to fill it instead of putting `todo!()` for every fields
before:
```rust
pub enum Other {
One,
Two,
}
pub struct Test {
text: String,
num: usize,
other: Other,
}
fn t_test() {
let test = Test {<|>};
}
```
after:
```rust
pub enum Other {
One,
Two,
}
pub struct Test {
text: String,
num: usize,
other: Other,
}
fn t_test() {
let test = Test {
text: String::new(),
num: 0,
other: todo!(),
};
}
```
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Coenen Benjamin <benjamin.coenen@hotmail.com>
Some features of rust-analyzer requires support for custom commands on
the client side. Specifically, hover & code lens need this.
Stock LSP doesn't have a way for the server to know which client-side
commands are available. For that reason, we historically were just
sending the commands, not worrying whether the client supports then or
not.
That's not really great though, so in this PR we add infrastructure for
the client to explicitly opt-into custom commands, via `extensions`
field of the ClientCapabilities.
To preserve backwards compatability, if the client doesn't set the
field, we assume that it does support all custom commands. In the
future, we'll start treating that case as if the client doesn't support
commands.
So, if you maintain a rust-analyzer client and implement
`rust-analyzer/runSingle` and such, please also advertise this via a
capability.
