Use a u64 for the rmeta root position
Waffle noticed this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117301#discussion_r1405410174
We've upgraded the other file offsets to u64, and this one only costs 4 bytes per file. Also the way the truncation was being done before was extremely easy to miss, I sure missed it! It's not clear to me if not having this change effectively made the other upgrades from u32 to u64 ineffective, but we can have it now.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Query for nearest parent block around the hint to resolve
This way, parameter hints will be found for resolution and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/15522#issuecomment-1835896335 will be fixed
Hopefully that also helps with whatever else (lifetimes', etc.) hints in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/13962
> hints are resolved by querying for textDocument/inlayHint with hint's position turned into a [position-1, position+1] range (instead of the original, much wider document range).
>
> This might lead to issues in the future, with e.g. lifetime hints (currently there's nothing to resolve for them and it's fine) that belong to a certain position, but need to have textDocument/inlayHint query for much bigger range than their position+/-1
fix: Don't emit "missing items" diagnostic for negative impls
Negative impls can't have items, so there is no reason for this diagnostic.
LMK if I should add a test somewhere. Also LMK if that's not how we usually check multiple things in an if in r-a.
fix: Fix view mir, hir and eval function not working when cursor is inside macros
I broke the view ones completely by inverting the macro check by accident a few days ago but we don't talk about that.
detects redundant imports that can be eliminated.
for #117772 :
In order to facilitate review and modification, split the checking code and
removing redundant imports code into two PR.
Replace `doc_comments_and_attrs` with `collect_attrs`
fix#16063
I looked at the other usages of `doc_comments_and_attrs` and it seems all of them are prone to ignoring inner attributes. `@Veykril` should I replace all of those with `collect_attrs` and remove `doc_comments_and_attrs` (or even `HasDocComments`) entirely?
Fallback to method resolution on unresolved field access with matching method name
Allows typing out a method name without having to add calling parentheses to do IDE things on it. The inverse of this we already have.
feat: Prioritize import suggestions based on the expected type
Hi, this is a draft PR to solve #15384. `Adt` types work and now I have a few questions :)
1. What other types make sense in this context? Looking at [ModuleDef](05666441ba/crates/hir/src/lib.rs (L275)) I am thinking everything except Modules.
2. Is there an existing way of converting between `ModeuleDef` and `hir::Type` in the rustanalyzer code base?
3. Does this approach seem sound to you?
Ups: Upon writing this I just realised that the enum test is invalided as there are no enum variants and this no variant is passed as a function argument.
fix: resolve Self type references in delegate method assist
This PR makes the delegate method assist resolve any `Self` type references in the parameters or return type. It also works across macros such as the `uint_impl!` macro used for `saturating_mul` in the issue example.
Closes#14485
fix: Fix item tree lowering pub(self) to pub()
Prior to this, the item tree lowered `pub(self)` visibility to `pub()`
Fix#15134 - tested with a unit test and
a manual end-to-end test of building rust-analyzer from my branch and opening the reproduction repository
Before
Private functions have RawVisibility module, but were
missed because take_types returned None early. After resolve_visibility
returned None, Visibility::Public was set instead and private functions
ended up being offered in autocompletion.
Choosing such a function results in an immediate error diagnostic
about using a private function.
After
Pattern match of take_types that returns None and
query for Module-level visibility from the original_module
Fix#15134 - tested with a unit test and a manual end-to-end
test of building rust-analyzer from my branch and opening
the reproduction repository
REVIEW
Refactor to move scope_def_applicable and check function visibility
from a module
Please let me know what's the best way to add a unit tests to
nameres, which is where the root cause was
Check if lhs is also a binexpr and use its rhs in flip binexpr assist
Closes#15508
From the original PR, flip binexpr assist is not meant to preserve equivalence, so I went with the simplest solution here.
I can add some extra checks to keep equivalence, but I think they should go in different specific assists (eg. flip arith op / flip logic op / etc), otherwise this one will get out of hand pretty quickly.
Show placeholder while run command gets runnables from server
This PR fixes a UI annoyance in the VS Code extension when working in large codebases where rust-analyzer can take a few moments to interact with the server. Scenario:
1. Invoke "rust-analyzer: Run" from the command palette or hotkey
2. Quickly start typing to filter the list (or press Enter to accept the last runnable)
We often do this quickly from muscle memory without waiting to see the picker. The picker often takes several seconds to come up, causing us to type garbage into the currently open editor.
Fix:
Show a placeholder item before we call out to the server.
Selecting this item does nothing so if the user accidentally hits Enter nothing happens.
The list is populated and the placeholder dismissed when the actual runnables are retrieved. From here the behavior is the same as before.
