feat: Display the value of enum variant on hover
fixes#12955
This PR adds const eval support for enums, as well as showing their value on hover, just as consts currently have.
I developed these two things at the same time, but I've realized now that they are separate. However since the hover is just a 10 line change (not including tests), I figured I may as well put them in the same PR. Though if you want them split up into "enum const eval support" and "show enum variant value on hover", I think that's reasonable too.
Since this adds const eval support for enums this also allows consts that reference enums to have their values computed now too.
The const evaluation itself is quite rudimentary, it doesn't keep track of the actual type of the enum, but it turns out that Rust doesn't actually either, and `E::A as u8` is valid regardless of the `repr` on `E`.
It also doesn't really care about what expression the enum variant contains, it could for example be a string, despite that not being allowed, but I guess it's up to the `cargo check` diagnostics to inform of such issues anyway?
fixup: remove unnecessary `Option`
Fixup for #13223, two things:
- `normalize_projection_query()` (and consequently `HirDatabase::normalize_projection()`) never returns `None` (well, it used to when I first wrote it...), so just return `Ty` instead of `Option<Ty>`
- When chalk cannot normalize projection uniquely, `normalize_trait_assoc_type()` used to return `None` before #13223, but not anymore because of the first point. I restored the behavior so its callers work as before.
fix: handle lifetime variables in projection normalization
Fixes#12674
The problem is that we've been skipping the binders of normalized projections assuming they should be empty, but the assumption is unfortunately wrong. We may get back lifetime variables and should handle them before returning them as normalized projections. For those who are curious why we get those even though we treat all lifetimes as 'static, [this comment in chalk](d875af0ff1/chalk-solve/src/infer/unify.rs (L888-L908)) may be interesting.
I thought using `InferenceTable` would be cleaner than the other ways as it already has the methods for canonicalization, normalizing projection, and resolving variables, so moved goal building and trait solving logic to a new `HirDatabase` query. I made it transparent query as the query itself doesn't do much work but the eventual call to `HirDatabase::trait_solve_query()` does.
internal: Record all macro definitions in ItemScope
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12100
Doesn't resolve the shadowing issues though, fixing those is gonna be really tricky I believe unless we can come up with a nice scheme to "order" item tree items (using syntax ranges and file ids would be a pain and also a bad idea since that'll require us to potentially reparse files in collection).
This change attempts to resolve issue #7636: Extract into Function does not
create a generic function with constraints when extracting generic code.
In `FunctionBody::analyze_container`, we now traverse the `ancestors` in search
of `AnyHasGenericParams`, and attach any `GenericParamList`s and `WhereClause`s
we find to the `ContainerInfo`.
Later, in `format_function`, we collect all the `GenericParam`s and
`WherePred`s from the container, and filter them to keep only types matching
`TypeParam`s used within the newly extracted function body or param list. We
can then include the new `GenericParamList` and `WhereClause` in the new
function definition.
This change only impacts `TypeParam`s. `LifetimeParam`s and `ConstParam`s are
out of scope for this change.
feat: Show witnesses of non-exhaustiveness in `missing-match-arm` diagnostic
Shamelessly copied from rustc. Thus reporting format is same.
This extends public api `hir::diagnostics::MissingMatchArms` with `uncovered_patterns: String` field. It does not expose data for implementing a quick fix yet.
-----
Worth to note: current implementation does not give a comprehensive list of missing patterns. Also mentioned in [paper](http://moscova.inria.fr/~maranget/papers/warn/warn.pdf):
> One may think that algorithm I should make an additional effort to provide more
> non-matching values, by systematically computing recursive calls on specialized
> matrices when possible, and by returning a list of all pattern vectors returned by
> recursive calls. We can first observe that it is not possible in general to supply the
> users with all non-matching values, since the signature of integers is (potentially)
> infinite.
Distinguish between
- there is no build data (for some reason?)
- there is build data, but the cargo package didn't build a proc macro dylib
- there is a proc macro dylib, but it didn't contain the proc macro we expected
- the name did not resolve to any macro (this is now an
unresolved_macro_call even for attributes)
I changed the handling of disabled attribute macro expansion to
immediately ignore the macro and report an unresolved_proc_macro,
because otherwise they would now result in loud unresolved_macro_call
errors. I hope this doesn't break anything.
Also try to improve error ranges for unresolved_macro_call / macro_error
by reusing the code for unresolved_proc_macro. It's not perfect but
probably better than before.
