There are two reasons why we don't want a generic ra_progress crate
just yet:
*First*, it introduces a common interface between separate components,
and that is usually undesirable (b/c components start to fit the
interface, rather than doing what makes most sense for each particular
component).
*Second*, it introduces a separate async channel for progress, which
makes it harder to correlate progress reports with the work done. Ie,
when we see 100% progress, it's not blindly obvious that the work has
actually finished, we might have some pending messages still.
4406: Update cargo-metadata r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR update `cargo-metadata` to 0.10.0 and it also relax the` serde-derive` deps to 1.0 for tests in `proc-macro-srv`.
cc @robojumper
r= @matklad , I think you would have something to say related to https://github.com/serde-rs/json/issues/647#issue-593788429 ?
4410: Improve wording in comment r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
4411: do not remove then block when you unwrap else block #4361 r=matklad a=bnjjj
close#4361
4417: Omit default types in HirDisplay SourceCode mode r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Closes#4390
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
