feat: Add incorrect case diagnostics for enum variant fields and all variables/params
Updates the incorrect case diagnostic to check:
1. Fields of enum variants. Example:
```rust
enum Foo {
Variant { nonSnake: u8 }
}
```
2. All variable bindings, instead of just let bindings and certain match arm patters. Examples:
```rust
match 1 { nonSnake => () }
match 1 { nonSnake @ 1 => () }
match 1 { nonSnake1 @ nonSnake2 => () } // slightly cursed, but these both introduce new
// bindings that are bound to the same value.
const ONE: i32 = 1;
match 1 { nonSnake @ ONE } // ONE is ignored since it is not a binding
match Some(1) { Some(nonSnake) => () }
struct Foo { field: u8 }
match (Foo { field: 1 } ) {
Foo { field: nonSnake } => ();
}
struct Foo { nonSnake: u8 } // diagnostic here, at definition
match (Foo { nonSnake: 1 } ) { // no diagnostic here...
Foo { nonSnake } => (); // ...or here, since these are not where the name is introduced
}
for nonSnake in [] {}
struct Foo(u8);
for Foo(nonSnake) in [] {}
```
3. All parameter bindings, instead of just top-level binding identifiers. Examples:
```rust
fn func(nonSnake: u8) {} // worked before
struct Foo { field: u8 }
fn func(Foo { field: nonSnake }: Foo) {} // now get diagnostic for nonSnake
```
This is accomplished by changing the way binding identifier patterns are filtered:
- Previously, all binding idents were skipped, except a few classes of "good" binding locations that were checked.
- Now, all binding idents are checked, except field shorthands which are skipped.
Moving from a whitelist to a blacklist potentially makes the analysis more brittle:
If new pattern types are added in the future where ident pats don't introduce new names, then they may incorrectly create diagnostics.
But the benefit of the blacklist approach is simplicity: I think a whitelist approach would need to recursively visit patterns to collect renaming candidates?
Add an option to use "::" for the external crate prefix.
Fixes#11823 .
Hi I'm very new to rust-analyzer and not sure how the review process are. Can somebody take a look at this PR? thanks!
Don't mark `#[rustc_deprecated_safe_2024]` functions as unsafe
`std::env::set_var` will be unsafe in edition 2024, but not before it. I couldn't quite figure out how to check for the span properly, so for now we just turn the false positives into false negatives, which are less bad.
`std::env::set_var` will be unsafe in edition 2024, but not before it.
I couldn't quite figure out how to check for the span properly, so for now
we just turn the false positives into false negatives, which are less bad.
Allow sysroots to only consist of the source root dir
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17159
This PR encodes the `None` case of an optional sysroot into `Sysroot` itself. This simplifies a lot of things and allows us to have sysroots that consist of nothing, only standard library sources, everything but the standard library sources or everything. This makes things a lot more flexible. Additionally, this removes the workspace status bar info again, as it turns out that that can be too much information for the status bar to handle (this is better rendered somewhere else, like in the status view).
Fix: infer type of async block with tail return expr
Fixes#17106
The `infer_async_block` method calls the `infer_block` method internally, which returns the never type without coercion when `tail_expr` is `None` and `ctx.diverges` is `Diverges::Always`.This is the reason for the bug in this issue.
cfce2bb46d/crates/hir-ty/src/infer/expr.rs (L1411-L1413)
This PR solves the bug by adding a process to coerce after calling `infer_block` method.
This code passes all the tests, including tests I added for this isuue, however, I am not sure if this solution is right. I think that this solution is an ad hoc solution. So, I would appreciate to have your review.
I apologize if I'm off the mark, but `infer_async_block` method should be rewritten to share code with the process of infering type of `expr::Closure` instead of the `infer_block` method. That way it will be closer to the infer process of rustc.
feat: More callable info
With this PR we retain more info about callables other than functions, allowing for closure parameter type inlay hints to be linkable as well as better signature help around closures and `Fn*` implementors.
When viewing traces, it's slightly confusing when the span name doesn't
match the function name. Ensure the names are consistent.
(It might be worth moving most of these to use #[tracing::instrument]
so the name can never go stale. @davidbarsky suggested that is marginally
slower, so I've just done the simple change here.)
Instead of using `core::fmt::format` to format panic messages, which may in turn
panic too and cause recursive panics and other messy things, redirect
`panic_fmt` to `const_panic_fmt` like CTFE, which in turn goes to
`panic_display` and does the things normally. See the tests for the full
call stack.
Handle panicking like rustc CTFE does
Instead of using `core::fmt::format` to format panic messages, which may in turn panic too and cause recursive panics and other messy things, redirect `panic_fmt` to `const_panic_fmt` like CTFE, which in turn goes to `panic_display` and does the things normally. See the tests for the full call stack.
The tests don't work yet, I probably missed something in minicore.
fixes#16907 in my local testing, I also need to add a test for it
Instead of using `core::fmt::format` to format panic messages, which may in turn
panic too and cause recursive panics and other messy things, redirect
`panic_fmt` to `const_panic_fmt` like CTFE, which in turn goes to
`panic_display` and does the things normally. See the tests for the full
call stack.
In the evaluation of const values of recursive types
certain declarations could cause an endless call-loop
within the interpreter (hir-ty’s create_memory_map),
which would lead to a stack overflow.
This commit adds a check that prevents values that contain
an address in their value (such as TyKind::Ref) from being
allocated at the address they contain.
The commit also adds a test for this edge case.
feat: Implement ATPIT
Resolves#16584
Note: This implementation only works for ATPIT, not for TAIT.
The main hinderence that blocks the later is the defining sites of TAIT can be inner blocks like in;
```rust
type X = impl Default;
mod foo {
fn bar() -> super::X {
()
}
}
```
So, to figure out we are defining it or not, we should recursively probe for nested modules and bodies.
For ATPIT, we can just look into current body because `error[E0401]: can't use 'Self' from outer item` prevent such nested structures;
```rust
trait Foo {
type Item;
fn foo() -> Self::Item;
}
struct Bar;
impl Foo for Bar {
type Item = impl Default;
fn foo() -> Self::Item {
fn bar() -> Self::Item {
^^^^^^^^^^
|
use of `Self` from outer item
refer to the type directly here instead
5
}
bar()
}
}
```
But this implementation does not checks for unification of same ATPIT between different bodies, monomorphization, nor layout for similar reason. (But these can be done with lazyness if we can utilize something like "mutation of interned value" with `db`. I coundn't find such thing but I would appreciate it if such thing exists and you could let me know 😅)
Bump dependencies and use in-tree `rustc_pattern_analysis`
One last `pattern_analysis` API change. I don't have any more planned! So we can now use the in-tree version when available.
internal: Compress file text using LZ4
I haven't tested properly, but this roughly looks like:
```
1246 MB
59mb 4899 FileTextQuery
1008 MB
20mb 4899 CompressedFileTextQuery
555kb 1790 FileTextQuery
```
We might want to test on something more interesting, like `bevy`.
From `impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>` to `impl Into<Cow<'static, str>>`.
Because these functions don't produce user-facing output and we don't
want their strings to be translated.
fix: Wrong closure kind deduction for closures with predicates
Completes #16472, fixes#16421
The changed closure kind deduction is mostly simlar to `rustc_hir_typeck/src/closure.rs`.
Porting closure sig deduction from it seems possible too and I'm considering doing it with another PR
performance: Speed up Method Completions By Taking Advantage of Orphan Rules
(Continues https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16498)
This PR speeds up method completions by doing two things without regressing `analysis-stats`[^1]:
- Filter candidate traits prior to calling `iterate_path_candidates` by relying on orphan rules (see below for a slightly more in-depth explanation). When generating completions [on `slog::Logger`](5e9e59c312/common/src/ledger.rs (L78)) in `oxidecomputer/omicron` as a test, this PR halved my completion times—it's now 454ms cold and 281ms warm. Before this PR, it was 808ms cold and 579ms warm.
- Inline some of the method candidate checks into `is_valid_method_candidate` and remove some unnecessary visibility checks. This was suggested by `@Veykril` in [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16498#issuecomment-1929864427).
We filter candidate traits by taking advantage of orphan rules. For additional details, I'll rely on `@WaffleLapkin's` explanation [from Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/Trait.20Checking/near/420942417):
> A type `A` can only implements traits which
> 1. Have a blanket implementation (`impl<T> Trait for T {}`)
> 2. Have implementation for `A` (`impl Trait for A {}`)
>
> Blanket implementation can only exist in `Trait`'s crate. Implementation for `A` can only exist in `A`'s or `Trait`'s crate.
Big thanks to Waffle for its keen observation!
---
I think some additional improvements are possible:
- `for_trait_and_self_ty` seemingly does not distinguish between `&T`, `&mut T`, or `T`, resulting in seemingly irrelevant traits like `tokio::io::AsyncWrite` being being included for, e.g., `&slog::Logger`. I don't know they're being considered due to the [autoref/autoderef behavior](a02a219773/crates/hir-ty/src/method_resolution.rs (L945-L962)), but I wonder if it'd make sense to filter by mutability earlier and not consider trait implementations that require `&mut T` when we only have a `&T`.
- The method completions [spend a _lot_ of time in unification](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/Trait.20Checking/near/421072356), and while there might be low-hanging fruit there, it might make more sense to wait for the new trait solver in `rustc`. I dunno.
[^1]: The filtering occurs outside of typechecking, after all.
