internal: Attempt to add a timeout to rustc-tests
Looks like some new test is stuck, this might help with figuring that out, though it unfortunately won't if its a chalk hang (which is the most likely)
fix: server hanging up on build script task
This should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/16614, can't say for certain since it might be not 100% reproducible... We really need to replace the current workspace fetching logic, it is completely unreadable and incredibly difficult to follow. I don't really understand how the server even got to hang here honestly (I would expect it to loop re-fetching build scripts, but not hang).
Setup infra for handling auto trait bounds disabled due to perf problems
This patch updates some of the partially-implemented functions of `ChalkContext as RustIrDatabase`, namely `adt_datum()` and `impl_provided_for()`. With those, we can now correctly work with auto trait bounds and distinguish methods based on them.
Resolves#7856 (the second code; the first one is resolved by #13074)
**IMPORTANT**: I don't think we want to merge this until #7637 is resolved. Currently this patch introduces A LOT of unknown types and type mismtaches as shown below. This is because we cannot resolve items like `hashbrown::HashMap` in `std` modules, leading to auto trait bounds on them and their dependents unprovable.
|crate (from `rustc-perf@c52ee6` except for r-a)|e3dc5a588f07d6f1d3a0f33051d4af26190abe9e|HEAD of this branch|
|---|---|---|
|rust-analyzer @ e3dc5a588f |exprs: 417528, ??ty: 907 (0%), ?ty: 114 (0%), !ty: 1|exprs: 417528, ??ty: 1704 (0%), ?ty: 403 (0%), !ty: 20|
|ripgrep|exprs: 62120, ??ty: 2 (0%), ?ty: 0 (0%), !ty: 0|exprs: 62120, ??ty: 132 (0%), ?ty: 58 (0%), !ty: 11|
|webrender/webrender|exprs: 94355, ??ty: 49 (0%), ?ty: 16 (0%), !ty: 2|exprs: 94355, ??ty: 429 (0%), ?ty: 130 (0%), !ty: 7|
|diesel|exprs: 132591, ??ty: 401 (0%), ?ty: 5129 (3%), !ty: 31|exprs: 132591, ??ty: 401 (0%), ?ty: 5129 (3%), !ty: 31|
feat!: create alias when renaming an import.
Closes#15858
Implemented:
- [x] - Prevent using `reserved` keywords (e.g self) and `_`.
- [x] - Rename other modules that might be referencing the import.
- [x] - Fix "broken" tests.
- [ ] - Rename **only** "direct" references.
- [ ] - Test more cases.
Future possibilities:
1. Also support `extern crate <name>` syntax.
2. Allow aliasing `self` when it is inside an `UseTreeList`.
~3. If import path already has an alias, "rename" the alias.~
~[4. Create alias even if path is not the last path segment.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16489#issuecomment-1930541697)~
feat: add non-exhaustive-let diagnostic
I want this to have a quickfix to add an else branch but I couldn't figure out how to do that, so here's the diagnostic on its own. It pretends a `let` is a match with one arm, and asks the match checking whether that match would be exhaustive.
Previously the pattern was checked based on its own type, but that was causing a panic in `match_check` (while processing e.g. `crates/hir/src/lib.rs`) so I changed it to use the initialiser's type instead, to align with the checking of actual match expressions. I think the panic can still happen, but I hear that `match_check` is going to be updated to a new version from rustc, so I'm posting this now in the hopes that the panic will magically go away when that happens.
test: include `rename_path_inside_use_tree`.
Keeps tracks the progress of the changes. 3 other tests broke with the changes
of this.
feat: rename all other usages within the current file.
feat: fix most of the implementation problems.
test: `rename_path_inside_use_tree` tests a more complicated scenario.
Commit 6a06f6f72 (Deduplicate reference search results, 2022-11-07) deduplicates references
within each definition.
There is an edge case when requesting references of a macro argument. Apparently, our
descend_into_macros() stanza in references.rs produces a cartesian product of
- references inside the macro times
- times references outside the macro.
Since the above deduplication only applies to the references within a single definition, we
return them all, leading to many redundant references.
Work around this by deduplicating definitions as well. Perhaps there is a better fix to not
produce this cartesian product in the first place; but I think at least for definitions the
problem would remain; a macro can contain multiple definitions of the same name, but since the
navigation target will be the unresolved location, it's the same for all of them.
We can't use unique() because we don't want to drop references that don't have a declaration
(though I dont' have an example for this case).
I discovered this working with the "bitflags" macro from the crate of the same name.
Fixes#16357
This mostly works well, and eliminates a couple of delayed bugs.
One annoying thing is that we should really also add an
`ErrorGuaranteed` to `proc_macro::bridge::LitKind::Err`. But that's
difficult because `proc_macro` doesn't have access to `ErrorGuaranteed`,
so we have to fake it.
