11484: Infer the array size for slice patterns r=flodiebold a=ChayimFriedman2
Fixes#11478 (feat or fix?),
I don't know much about the type-checking in RA, so maybe I did some obvious mistake.
Co-authored-by: Chayim Refael Friedman <chayimfr@gmail.com>
11480: fix: keyword hover works on non-keyword tokens if expanded to keyword r=Veykril a=Veykril
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
11369: feat: Add type hint for keyword expression hovers r=Veykril a=danii
Adds the return type of keywords to tool-tips where it makes sense. This applies to: `if`, `else`, `match`, `loop`, `unsafe` and `await`. Thanks to `@Veykril` for sharing the idea of putting return type highlighting on other keywords!
Closes#11359
Co-authored-by: Daniel Conley <himself@danii.dev>
11470: correct the description of Struct GlobalState r=lnicola a=doki23
Fixes#11469
The description of GlobalState should be 'more than one impl'
Co-authored-by: doki <11144133+doki23@users.noreply.github.com>
11442: fix(rename): Use text range of a mod name after macro expansion r=Veykril a=tysg
Fixes#11417.
11460: fix: documentation of SsrParams r=Veykril a=nemethf
Fix#11429 by extending the documentation of SsrParms with the
mandatory field 'selections'. Copy its description from lsp_ext.rs.
Co-authored-by: Tianyi Song <42670338+tysg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felicián Németh <felician.nemeth@gmail.com>
Extracting a struct from an enum variant now filters out only the
generic parameters necessary for the new struct.
Bounds will be copied to the new struct, but unneeded ones are not
filtered out.
Extracting bounds in a where clause are still not implemented.
11444: feat: Fix up syntax errors in attribute macro inputs to make completion work more often r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This implements the "fix up syntax nodes" workaround mentioned in #11014. It isn't much more than a proof of concept; I have only implemented a few cases, but it already helps quite a bit.
Some notes:
- I'm not super happy about how much the fixup procedure needs to interact with the syntax node -> token tree conversion code (e.g. needing to share the token map). This could maybe be simplified with some refactoring of that code.
- It would maybe be nice to have the fixup procedure reuse or share information with the parser, though I'm not really sure how much that would actually help.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
