4947: Replace `impls_in_trait` query with smarter use of `CrateImplDefs` r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
`impls_in_trait` was allocating a whopping ~400 MB of RAM when running analysis-stats on r-a itself.
Remove it, instead adding a query that computes a summary `CrateImplDefs` map for all transitive dependencies. This can probably still be made more efficient, but this already reduces the peak memory usage by 25% without much performance impact on analysis-stats.
**Before**:
```
Total: 34.962107188s, 2083mb allocated 2141mb resident
422mb ImplsForTraitQuery (deps)
250mb CrateDefMapQueryQuery
147mb MacroArgQuery
140mb TraitSolveQuery (deps)
68mb InferQueryQuery (deps)
62mb ImplDatumQuery (deps)
```
**After**:
```
Total: 35.261100358s, 1520mb allocated 1569mb resident
250mb CrateDefMapQueryQuery
147mb MacroArgQuery
144mb TraitSolveQuery (deps)
68mb InferQueryQuery (deps)
61mb ImplDatumQuery (deps)
45mb BodyQuery
45mb ImplDatumQuery
```
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
4958: Infer FnSig via Fn traits r=flodiebold a=adamrk
Addresses https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4481.
When inferring types check if the callee implements one of the builtin `Fn` traits. Also autoderef the callee before trying to figure out it's `FnSig`.
Co-authored-by: adamrk <ark.email@gmail.com>
When referring to an associated type of a super trait, we used the substs of the
subtrait. That led to the #4931 crash if the subtrait had less parameters, but
it could also lead to other incorrectness if just the order was different.
Fixes#4931.
4851: Add quickfix to add a struct field r=TimoFreiberg a=TimoFreiberg
Related to #4563
I created a quickfix for record literals first because the NoSuchField diagnostic was already there.
To offer that quickfix for FieldExprs with unknown fields I'd need to add a new diagnostic (or create a `NoSuchField` diagnostic for those cases)
I think it'd make sense to make this a snippet completion (to select the generated type), but this would require changing the `Analysis` API and I'd like some feedback before I touch that.
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
4937: Allow overriding rust-analyzer display version r=matklad a=oxalica
The build script invokes `git` for version information which is displayed when rust-analyzer is called with `--version`. But in build environment without `git` or when the source code is not a git repo, there's no way to manually specify the version information.
This patch respects environment variable ~`REV`~ `RUST_ANALYZER_REV` in compile time for overriding.
Related: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/90976
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
The task of `partition` function is to bin the flat list of paths into
disjoint filesets. Ideally, it should be incremental -- each new file
should be added to a specific fileset.
However, preliminary measurnments show that it is actually fast enough
if we just optimize this to use a binary search instead of a linear
scan.
4930: Avoid all unchecked indexing in match checking r=flodiebold a=jonas-schievink
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4416, but replaces it with a false positive.
r? @flodiebold
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
4903: Add highlighting support for doc comments r=matklad a=Nashenas88
The language server protocol includes a semantic modifier for documentation. This change exports that modifier for doc comments so users can choose to highlight them differently compared to regular comments.
Example:
<img width="375" alt="Screen Shot 2020-06-16 at 10 34 14 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1673130/84788271-f6599580-afbc-11ea-96e5-7a0215da620b.png">
CC @woody77
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <Nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
4934: Remove special casing for library symbols r=matklad a=matklad
We might as well handle them internally, via queries.
I am not sure, but it looks like the current LibraryData setup might
even predate salsa? It's not really needed and creates a bunch of
complexity.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
We might as well handle them internally, via queries.
I am not sure, but it looks like the current LibraryData setup might
even predate salsa? It's not really needed and creates a bunch of
complexity.
