When r-a starts up, it starts switching the workspace before all vfs
events have been processed which causes us to switch workspace multiple
times until all vfs changes have been processed. This scales with the
size of the project and its dependencies. If workspace files from
dependencies as well as the sysroot get loaded, we shouldn't switch
the workspace as those have no impact on the project workspace.
Avoid invalidating the CFG in `MirPatch`
As a part of this change, we adjust `MirPatch` to not needlessly create unnecessary resume blocks.
r? `@tmiasko`
feat: Only flycheck workspace that belongs to saved file
Supercedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/11038
There is still the problem that all the diagnostics are cleared, only clearing diagnostics of the relevant workspace isn't easily doable though I think, will have to dig into that
Always create elided lifetimes, even if inferred.
`PathSource` gives the context in which a path is encountered. The same `PathSource` is used for the full path and the `QSelf` part.
Therefore, we can only rely on `PathSource` to know whether typechecking will be able to infer the lifetimes, not whether we need to insert them at all.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99949
Some `is_useful` cleanups
#98582 was reverted because it was a perf regression.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99806 reintroduces the changes, but this PR picks individual ones that have no regressions.
Update cargo, rls
14 commits in 85b500ccad8cd0b63995fd94a03ddd4b83f7905b..4fd148c47e733770c537efac5220744945d572ef
2022-07-24 21:10:46 +0000 to 2022-08-03 15:03:52 +0000
- Revert "Drop check for mingw32-make." (rust-lang/cargo#10934)
- Add reasons to all ignored tests. (rust-lang/cargo#10929)
- Grammar fixup unused patch message (rust-lang/cargo#10933)
- Always allow hg to be missing on CI. (rust-lang/cargo#10931)
- Fix formats_source test requiring rustfmt. (rust-lang/cargo#10918)
- Disable scrape_examples_complex_reverse_dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#10921)
- Contrib: Add docs on the rustbot ready command (rust-lang/cargo#10916)
- Support for negative --jobs parameter, counting backwards from max CPUs (rust-lang/cargo#10844)
- Add requirements to cargo_test. (rust-lang/cargo#9892)
- Contrib: Document submodule update process (rust-lang/cargo#10913)
- Contrib: Add docs on how to use crater (rust-lang/cargo#10912)
- Contrib: Document new-release process (rust-lang/cargo#10914)
- Override to resolver=1 in published package (rust-lang/cargo#10911)
- fix(add): Update the lock file (rust-lang/cargo#10902)
1 commits in fcf1f94c9ab2acc18cfd4368a4aeb38e77da9649..4d8b0a19986a4daab37287a5b5fe2da0775d1873
2022-07-14 17:19:11 +0200 to 2022-08-02 22:34:34 -0400
- Update cargo (rust-lang/rls#1782)
Add back Send and Sync impls on ChunksMut iterators
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100014
These were accidentally removed in #94247 because the representation was changed from `&mut [T]` to `*mut T`, which has `!Send + !Sync`.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99933 (parallelize HTML checking tool)
- #99958 (Improve position named arguments lint underline and formatting names)
- #100008 (Update all pre-cloned submodules on startup)
- #100049 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
- #100070 (Clarify Cargo.toml comments)
- #100074 (rustc-docs: Be less specific about the representation of `+bundle`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
feat: support associated values in "Generate Enum Variant" assist
This change adds support for associated values to the "Generate Enum Variant" assist.
I've split the implementation out into 4 steps to make code review easier:
- Add "add_variant" support to the structural ast editing system in `edit_in_place`
- Migrate `generate_enum_variant` to use structural ast editing instead of string manipulation
- Support tuple fields
- Support record fields
Please let me know if I should leave the commits as-is, or squash before merging.
Fixes#12797
Add syntax fixup for while loops
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12777
This is a first iteration to gather some feedback. In particular I'm not sure if the curly braces should be added here, but I couldn't get the test to work without them. Any hints welcome!
