This is working, but I'm not that happy with how the lowering works. We might
need an additional representation between `TypeRef` and `Ty` where names are
resolved and `impl Trait` bounds are separated out, but things like inference
variables don't exist and `impl Trait` is always represented the same
way.
Also note that this doesn't implement correct handling of RPIT *inside* the
function (which involves turning the `impl Trait`s into variables and creating
obligations for them). That intermediate representation might help there as
well.
Function pointers can be 'higher-ranked' over lifetimes, which is why they're
not an application type in Chalk, but since we don't model lifetimes it doesn't
matter for us yet.
So e.g. if we have `fn foo<T: SomeTrait<u32>>() -> T::Item`, we want to lower
that to `<T as SomeTrait<u32>>::Item` and not `<T as SomeTrait<_>>::Item`.
4023: Fix another crash from wrong binders r=matklad a=flodiebold
Basically, if we had something like `dyn Trait<T>` (where `T` is a type parameter) in an impl we lowered that to `dyn Trait<^0.0>`, when it should be `dyn Trait<^1.0>` because the `dyn` introduces a new binder. With one type parameter, that's just wrong, with two, it'll lead to crashes.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Basically, if we had something like `dyn Trait<T>` (where `T` is a type
parameter) in an impl we lowered that to `dyn Trait<^0.0>`, when it should be
`dyn Trait<^1.0>` because the `dyn` introduces a new binder. With one type
parameter, that's just wrong, with two, it'll lead to crashes.
Fixes a lot of false type mismatches.
(And as always when touching the unification code, I have to say I'm looking
forward to replacing it by Chalk's...)
3966: Add support for bounds on associated types in trait definitions r=matklad a=flodiebold
E.g.
```rust
trait Trait {
type Item: SomeOtherTrait;
}
```
Note that these don't simply desugar to where clauses; as I understand it, where clauses have to be proved by the *user* of the trait, but these bounds are proved by the *implementor*. (Also, where clauses on associated types are unstable.)
(Another one from my recursive solver branch...)
3968: Remove format from syntax_bridge hot path r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
Although only around 1% speed up by running:
```
Measure-Command {start-process .\target\release\rust-analyzer "analysis-stats -q ." -NoNewWindow -wait}
```
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3964: Nicer Chalk debug logs r=matklad a=flodiebold
I'm looking at a lot of Chalk debug logs at the moment, so here's a few changes to make them slightly nicer...
3965: Implement inline associated type bounds r=matklad a=flodiebold
Like `Iterator<Item: SomeTrait>`.
This is an unstable feature, but it's used in the standard library e.g. in the definition of Flatten, so we can't get away with not implementing it :)
(This is cherry-picked from my recursive solver branch, where it works better, but I did manage to write a test that works with the current Chalk solver as well...)
3967: Handle `Self::Type` in trait definitions when referring to own associated type r=matklad a=flodiebold
It was implemented for other generic parameters for the trait, but not for `Self`.
(Last one off my recursive solver branch 😄 )
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
E.g.
```
trait Trait {
type Item: SomeOtherTrait;
}
```
Note that these don't simply desugar to where clauses; as I understand it, where
clauses have to be proved by the *user* of the trait, but these bounds are proved
by the *implementor*. (Also, where clauses on associated types are unstable.)
Like `Iterator<Item: SomeTrait>`.
This is an unstable feature, but it's used in the standard library e.g. in the
definition of Flatten, so we can't get away with not implementing it :)
To do this we need to carry around the original resolution a bit, because `Self`
gets resolved to the actual type immediately, but you're not allowed to write
the equivalent type in a projection. (I tried just comparing the projection base
type with the impl self type, but that seemed too dirty.) This is basically how
rustc does it as well.
Fixes#3249.
2661: Implement infer await from async function r=flodiebold a=edwin0cheng
This PR is my attempt for trying to add support for infer `.await` expression from an `async` function, by desugaring its return type to `Impl Future<Output=RetType>`.
Note that I don't know it is supposed to desugaring it in that phase, if it is not suitable in current design, just feel free to reject it :)
r=@flodiebold
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
When calling a function, argument-position impl Trait is transparent; same for
return-position impl Trait when inside the function. So in these cases, we need
to represent that type not by `Ty::Opaque`, but by a type variable that can be
unified with whatever flows into there.
