mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer
synced 2024-12-25 12:33:33 +00:00
Merge #6624
6624: Check structs for match exhaustiveness r=Veykril a=Veykril Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
commit
d2f398cd76
1 changed files with 120 additions and 31 deletions
|
@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ use hir_def::{
|
|||
adt::VariantData,
|
||||
body::Body,
|
||||
expr::{Expr, Literal, Pat, PatId},
|
||||
AdtId, EnumVariantId, VariantId,
|
||||
AdtId, EnumVariantId, StructId, VariantId,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use smallvec::{smallvec, SmallVec};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -391,21 +391,28 @@ impl PatStack {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Pat::Wild, constructor) => Some(self.expand_wildcard(cx, constructor)?),
|
||||
(Pat::Path(_), Constructor::Enum(constructor)) => {
|
||||
(Pat::Path(_), constructor) => {
|
||||
// unit enum variants become `Pat::Path`
|
||||
let pat_id = head.as_id().expect("we know this isn't a wild");
|
||||
if !enum_variant_matches(cx, pat_id, *constructor) {
|
||||
let variant_id: VariantId = match constructor {
|
||||
&Constructor::Enum(e) => e.into(),
|
||||
&Constructor::Struct(s) => s.into(),
|
||||
_ => return Err(MatchCheckErr::NotImplemented),
|
||||
};
|
||||
if Some(variant_id) != cx.infer.variant_resolution_for_pat(pat_id) {
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Some(self.to_tail())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(
|
||||
Pat::TupleStruct { args: ref pat_ids, ellipsis, .. },
|
||||
Constructor::Enum(enum_constructor),
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
(Pat::TupleStruct { args: ref pat_ids, ellipsis, .. }, constructor) => {
|
||||
let pat_id = head.as_id().expect("we know this isn't a wild");
|
||||
if !enum_variant_matches(cx, pat_id, *enum_constructor) {
|
||||
let variant_id: VariantId = match constructor {
|
||||
&Constructor::Enum(e) => e.into(),
|
||||
&Constructor::Struct(s) => s.into(),
|
||||
_ => return Err(MatchCheckErr::MalformedMatchArm),
|
||||
};
|
||||
if Some(variant_id) != cx.infer.variant_resolution_for_pat(pat_id) {
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let constructor_arity = constructor.arity(cx)?;
|
||||
|
@ -443,12 +450,22 @@ impl PatStack {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Pat::Record { args: ref arg_patterns, .. }, Constructor::Enum(e)) => {
|
||||
(Pat::Record { args: ref arg_patterns, .. }, constructor) => {
|
||||
let pat_id = head.as_id().expect("we know this isn't a wild");
|
||||
if !enum_variant_matches(cx, pat_id, *e) {
|
||||
let (variant_id, variant_data) = match constructor {
|
||||
&Constructor::Enum(e) => (
|
||||
e.into(),
|
||||
cx.db.enum_data(e.parent).variants[e.local_id].variant_data.clone(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
&Constructor::Struct(s) => {
|
||||
(s.into(), cx.db.struct_data(s).variant_data.clone())
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => return Err(MatchCheckErr::MalformedMatchArm),
|
||||
};
|
||||
if Some(variant_id) != cx.infer.variant_resolution_for_pat(pat_id) {
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
match cx.db.enum_data(e.parent).variants[e.local_id].variant_data.as_ref() {
|
||||
match variant_data.as_ref() {
|
||||
VariantData::Record(struct_field_arena) => {
|
||||
// Here we treat any missing fields in the record as the wild pattern, as
|
||||
// if the record has ellipsis. We want to do this here even if the
|
||||
|
@ -727,6 +744,7 @@ enum Constructor {
|
|||
Bool(bool),
|
||||
Tuple { arity: usize },
|
||||
Enum(EnumVariantId),
|
||||
Struct(StructId),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Constructor {
|
||||
|
@ -741,6 +759,11 @@ impl Constructor {
|
|||
VariantData::Unit => 0,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
&Constructor::Struct(s) => match cx.db.struct_data(s).variant_data.as_ref() {
|
||||
VariantData::Tuple(struct_field_data) => struct_field_data.len(),
|
||||
VariantData::Record(struct_field_data) => struct_field_data.len(),
|
||||
VariantData::Unit => 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(arity)
|
||||
|
@ -749,7 +772,7 @@ impl Constructor {
|
|||
fn all_constructors(&self, cx: &MatchCheckCtx) -> Vec<Constructor> {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
Constructor::Bool(_) => vec![Constructor::Bool(true), Constructor::Bool(false)],
|
||||
Constructor::Tuple { .. } => vec![*self],
|
||||
Constructor::Tuple { .. } | Constructor::Struct(_) => vec![*self],
|
||||
Constructor::Enum(e) => cx
|
||||
.db
|
||||
.enum_data(e.parent)
|
||||
|
@ -786,6 +809,7 @@ fn pat_constructor(cx: &MatchCheckCtx, pat: PatIdOrWild) -> MatchCheckResult<Opt
|
|||
VariantId::EnumVariantId(enum_variant_id) => {
|
||||
Some(Constructor::Enum(enum_variant_id))
|
||||
}
|
||||
VariantId::StructId(struct_id) => Some(Constructor::Struct(struct_id)),
|
||||
_ => return Err(MatchCheckErr::NotImplemented),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -830,13 +854,13 @@ fn all_constructors_covered(
|
|||
|
||||
false
|
||||
}),
|
||||
&Constructor::Struct(s) => used_constructors.iter().any(|constructor| match constructor {
|
||||
&Constructor::Struct(sid) => sid == s,
|
||||
_ => false,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn enum_variant_matches(cx: &MatchCheckCtx, pat_id: PatId, enum_variant_id: EnumVariantId) -> bool {
|
||||
Some(enum_variant_id.into()) == cx.infer.variant_resolution_for_pat(pat_id)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
use crate::diagnostics::tests::check_diagnostics;
|
||||
|
@ -848,8 +872,8 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
fn main() {
|
||||
match () { }
|
||||
//^^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match (()) { }
|
||||
//^^^^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match (()) { }
|
||||
//^^^^ Missing match arm
|
||||
|
||||
match () { _ => (), }
|
||||
match () { () => (), }
|
||||
|
@ -1393,6 +1417,84 @@ fn main() {
|
|||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn record_struct() {
|
||||
check_diagnostics(
|
||||
r#"struct Foo { a: bool }
|
||||
fn main(f: Foo) {
|
||||
match f {}
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match f { Foo { a: true } => () }
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match &f { Foo { a: true } => () }
|
||||
//^^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match f { Foo { a: _ } => () }
|
||||
match f {
|
||||
Foo { a: true } => (),
|
||||
Foo { a: false } => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match &f {
|
||||
Foo { a: true } => (),
|
||||
Foo { a: false } => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn tuple_struct() {
|
||||
check_diagnostics(
|
||||
r#"struct Foo(bool);
|
||||
fn main(f: Foo) {
|
||||
match f {}
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match f { Foo(true) => () }
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match f {
|
||||
Foo(true) => (),
|
||||
Foo(false) => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn unit_struct() {
|
||||
check_diagnostics(
|
||||
r#"struct Foo;
|
||||
fn main(f: Foo) {
|
||||
match f {}
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match f { Foo => () }
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn record_struct_ellipsis() {
|
||||
check_diagnostics(
|
||||
r#"struct Foo { foo: bool, bar: bool }
|
||||
fn main(f: Foo) {
|
||||
match f { Foo { foo: true, .. } => () }
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
match f {
|
||||
//^ Missing match arm
|
||||
Foo { foo: true, .. } => (),
|
||||
Foo { bar: false, .. } => ()
|
||||
}
|
||||
match f { Foo { .. } => () }
|
||||
match f {
|
||||
Foo { foo: true, .. } => (),
|
||||
Foo { foo: false, .. } => ()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mod false_negatives {
|
||||
//! The implementation of match checking here is a work in progress. As we roll this out, we
|
||||
//! prefer false negatives to false positives (ideally there would be no false positives). This
|
||||
|
@ -1431,19 +1533,6 @@ fn main() {
|
|||
Either::A(true | false) => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn struct_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// We don't currently handle structs.
|
||||
check_diagnostics(
|
||||
r#"
|
||||
struct Foo { a: bool }
|
||||
fn main(f: Foo) {
|
||||
match f { Foo { a: true } => () }
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue