mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer
synced 2024-12-25 20:43:21 +00:00
Reduce visibility
This commit is contained in:
parent
45ec95caf6
commit
7b2ce1a54f
1 changed files with 82 additions and 84 deletions
|
@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ impl From<&PatId> for PatIdOrWild {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub enum MatchCheckErr {
|
||||
pub(super) enum MatchCheckErr {
|
||||
NotImplemented,
|
||||
MalformedMatchArm,
|
||||
/// Used when type inference cannot resolve the type of
|
||||
|
@ -287,21 +287,21 @@ pub enum MatchCheckErr {
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// The `std::result::Result` type is used here rather than a custom enum
|
||||
/// to allow the use of `?`.
|
||||
pub type MatchCheckResult<T> = Result<T, MatchCheckErr>;
|
||||
pub(super) type MatchCheckResult<T> = Result<T, MatchCheckErr>;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
/// A row in a Matrix.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This type is modeled from the struct of the same name in `rustc`.
|
||||
pub(crate) struct PatStack(PatStackInner);
|
||||
pub(super) struct PatStack(PatStackInner);
|
||||
type PatStackInner = SmallVec<[PatIdOrWild; 2]>;
|
||||
|
||||
impl PatStack {
|
||||
pub(crate) fn from_pattern(pat_id: PatId) -> PatStack {
|
||||
pub(super) fn from_pattern(pat_id: PatId) -> PatStack {
|
||||
Self(smallvec!(pat_id.into()))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn from_wild() -> PatStack {
|
||||
pub(super) fn from_wild() -> PatStack {
|
||||
Self(smallvec!(PatIdOrWild::Wild))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -510,14 +510,14 @@ impl PatStack {
|
|||
/// A collection of PatStack.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This type is modeled from the struct of the same name in `rustc`.
|
||||
pub(crate) struct Matrix(Vec<PatStack>);
|
||||
pub(super) struct Matrix(Vec<PatStack>);
|
||||
|
||||
impl Matrix {
|
||||
pub(crate) fn empty() -> Self {
|
||||
pub(super) fn empty() -> Self {
|
||||
Self(vec![])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn push(&mut self, cx: &MatchCheckCtx, row: PatStack) {
|
||||
pub(super) fn push(&mut self, cx: &MatchCheckCtx, row: PatStack) {
|
||||
if let Some(Pat::Or(pat_ids)) = row.get_head().map(|pat_id| pat_id.as_pat(cx)) {
|
||||
// Or patterns are expanded here
|
||||
for pat_id in pat_ids {
|
||||
|
@ -579,16 +579,16 @@ impl Matrix {
|
|||
/// not matched by an prior match arms.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We may eventually need an `Unknown` variant here.
|
||||
pub enum Usefulness {
|
||||
pub(super) enum Usefulness {
|
||||
Useful,
|
||||
NotUseful,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct MatchCheckCtx<'a> {
|
||||
pub match_expr: Idx<Expr>,
|
||||
pub body: Arc<Body>,
|
||||
pub infer: Arc<InferenceResult>,
|
||||
pub db: &'a dyn HirDatabase,
|
||||
pub(super) struct MatchCheckCtx<'a> {
|
||||
pub(super) match_expr: Idx<Expr>,
|
||||
pub(super) body: Arc<Body>,
|
||||
pub(super) infer: Arc<InferenceResult>,
|
||||
pub(super) db: &'a dyn HirDatabase,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Given a set of patterns `matrix`, and pattern to consider `v`, determines
|
||||
|
@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ pub struct MatchCheckCtx<'a> {
|
|||
/// expected that you have already type checked the match arms. All patterns in
|
||||
/// matrix should be the same type as v, as well as they should all be the same
|
||||
/// type as the match expression.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn is_useful(
|
||||
pub(super) fn is_useful(
|
||||
cx: &MatchCheckCtx,
|
||||
matrix: &Matrix,
|
||||
v: &PatStack,
|
||||
|
@ -837,23 +837,23 @@ fn enum_variant_matches(cx: &MatchCheckCtx, pat_id: PatId, enum_variant_id: Enum
|
|||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
pub(super) use insta::assert_snapshot;
|
||||
pub(super) use ra_db::fixture::WithFixture;
|
||||
use insta::assert_snapshot;
|
||||
use ra_db::fixture::WithFixture;
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) use crate::{diagnostics::MissingMatchArms, test_db::TestDB};
|
||||
use crate::{diagnostics::MissingMatchArms, test_db::TestDB};
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn check_diagnostic_message(ra_fixture: &str) -> String {
|
||||
fn check_diagnostic_message(ra_fixture: &str) -> String {
|
||||
TestDB::with_single_file(ra_fixture).0.diagnostic::<MissingMatchArms>().0
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn check_diagnostic(ra_fixture: &str) {
|
||||
fn check_diagnostic(ra_fixture: &str) {
|
||||
let diagnostic_count =
|
||||
TestDB::with_single_file(ra_fixture).0.diagnostic::<MissingMatchArms>().1;
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(1, diagnostic_count, "no diagnostic reported");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn check_no_diagnostic(ra_fixture: &str) {
|
||||
fn check_no_diagnostic(ra_fixture: &str) {
|
||||
let (s, diagnostic_count) =
|
||||
TestDB::with_single_file(ra_fixture).0.diagnostic::<MissingMatchArms>();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2036,28 +2036,25 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod false_negatives {
|
||||
//! The implementation of match checking here is a work in progress. As we roll this out, we
|
||||
//! prefer false negatives to false positives (ideally there would be no false positives). This
|
||||
//! test module should document known false negatives. Eventually we will have a complete
|
||||
//! implementation of match checking and this module will be empty.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The reasons for documenting known false negatives:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. It acts as a backlog of work that can be done to improve the behavior of the system.
|
||||
//! 2. It ensures the code doesn't panic when handling these cases.
|
||||
mod false_negatives {
|
||||
//! The implementation of match checking here is a work in progress. As we roll this out, we
|
||||
//! prefer false negatives to false positives (ideally there would be no false positives). This
|
||||
//! test module should document known false negatives. Eventually we will have a complete
|
||||
//! implementation of match checking and this module will be empty.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The reasons for documenting known false negatives:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. It acts as a backlog of work that can be done to improve the behavior of the system.
|
||||
//! 2. It ensures the code doesn't panic when handling these cases.
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
|
||||
use super::tests::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn integers() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently check integer exhaustiveness.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn integers() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently check integer exhaustiveness.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
fn test_fn() {
|
||||
match 5 {
|
||||
10 => (),
|
||||
|
@ -2065,15 +2062,15 @@ mod false_negatives {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn internal_or() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We do not currently handle patterns with internal `or`s.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn internal_or() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We do not currently handle patterns with internal `or`s.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
fn test_fn() {
|
||||
enum Either {
|
||||
A(bool),
|
||||
|
@ -2084,17 +2081,17 @@ mod false_negatives {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn expr_loop_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We currently infer the type of `loop { break Foo::A }` to `!`, which
|
||||
// causes us to skip the diagnostic since `Either::A` doesn't type check
|
||||
// with `!`.
|
||||
check_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn expr_loop_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We currently infer the type of `loop { break Foo::A }` to `!`, which
|
||||
// causes us to skip the diagnostic since `Either::A` doesn't type check
|
||||
// with `!`.
|
||||
check_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
enum Either {
|
||||
A,
|
||||
B,
|
||||
|
@ -2105,45 +2102,45 @@ mod false_negatives {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn tuple_of_bools_with_ellipsis_at_end_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently handle tuple patterns with ellipsis.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn tuple_of_bools_with_ellipsis_at_end_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently handle tuple patterns with ellipsis.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
fn test_fn() {
|
||||
match (false, true, false) {
|
||||
(false, ..) => {},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn tuple_of_bools_with_ellipsis_at_beginning_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently handle tuple patterns with ellipsis.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn tuple_of_bools_with_ellipsis_at_beginning_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently handle tuple patterns with ellipsis.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
fn test_fn() {
|
||||
match (false, true, false) {
|
||||
(.., false) => {},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn struct_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently handle structs.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn struct_missing_arm() {
|
||||
// This is a false negative.
|
||||
// We don't currently handle structs.
|
||||
check_no_diagnostic(
|
||||
r"
|
||||
struct Foo {
|
||||
a: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2153,6 +2150,7 @@ mod false_negatives {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
",
|
||||
);
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue