Add Keyword Return Type Highlighting

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Conley 2022-01-28 14:44:17 -05:00
parent 6634eaf13a
commit 261abbf45e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 94C21E7A0607F1DC

View file

@ -239,22 +239,20 @@ pub(super) fn keyword(
}
let parent = token.parent()?;
let famous_defs = FamousDefs(sema, sema.scope(&parent).krate());
let keyword_mod = if token.kind() == T![fn] && ast::FnPtrType::cast(parent).is_some() {
// treat fn keyword inside function pointer type as primitive
format!("prim_{}", token.text())
} else {
// std exposes {}_keyword modules with docstrings on the root to document keywords
format!("{}_keyword", token.text())
};
let doc_owner = find_std_module(&famous_defs, &keyword_mod)?;
// some keywords get fancy type tooltips if they are apart of an expression, which require some extra work
// panic safety: we just checked that token is a keyword, and we have it's parent in scope, so it must have a parent
let KeywordHint { description, documentation, actions } = keyword_hints(sema, token);
let doc_owner = find_std_module(&famous_defs, &documentation)?;
let docs = doc_owner.attrs(sema.db).docs()?;
let markup = process_markup(
sema.db,
Definition::Module(doc_owner),
&markup(Some(docs.into()), token.text().into(), None)?,
&markup(Some(docs.into()), description, None)?,
config,
);
Some(HoverResult { markup, actions: Default::default() })
Some(HoverResult { markup, actions })
}
pub(super) fn try_for_lint(attr: &ast::Attr, token: &SyntaxToken) -> Option<HoverResult> {
@ -500,3 +498,94 @@ fn local(db: &RootDatabase, it: hir::Local) -> Option<Markup> {
};
markup(None, desc, None)
}
struct KeywordHint {
description: String,
documentation: String,
actions: Vec<HoverAction>,
}
impl KeywordHint {
fn new(description: String, documentation: String) -> Self {
Self { description, documentation, actions: Vec::default() }
}
}
/// Panics
/// ------
/// `token` is assumed to:
/// - have a parent, and
/// - be a keyword
fn keyword_hints<'t>(sema: &Semantics<RootDatabase>, token: &'t SyntaxToken) -> KeywordHint {
let parent = token.parent().expect("token was assumed to have a parent, but had none");
macro_rules! create_hint {
($ty_info:expr, $doc:expr) => {{
let documentation = $doc;
match $ty_info {
Some(ty) => {
let mut targets: Vec<hir::ModuleDef> = Vec::new();
let mut push_new_def = |item: hir::ModuleDef| {
if !targets.contains(&item) {
targets.push(item);
}
};
walk_and_push_ty(sema.db, &ty.original, &mut push_new_def);
let ty = ty.adjusted();
let description = format!("{}: {}", token.text(), ty.display(sema.db));
KeywordHint {
description,
documentation,
actions: vec![HoverAction::goto_type_from_targets(sema.db, targets)],
}
}
None => KeywordHint {
description: token.text().to_string(),
documentation,
actions: Vec::new(),
},
}
}};
}
match token.kind() {
T![await] | T![loop] | T![match] | T![unsafe] => {
let ty = ast::Expr::cast(parent).and_then(|site| sema.type_of_expr(&site));
create_hint!(ty, format!("{}_keyword", token.text()))
}
T![if] | T![else] => {
fn if_has_else(site: &ast::IfExpr) -> bool {
match site.else_branch() {
Some(ast::ElseBranch::IfExpr(inner)) => if_has_else(&inner),
Some(ast::ElseBranch::Block(_)) => true,
None => false,
}
}
// only include the type if there is an else branch; it isn't worth annotating
// an expression that always returns `()`, is it?
let ty = ast::IfExpr::cast(parent)
.and_then(|site| if_has_else(&site).then(|| site))
.and_then(|site| sema.type_of_expr(&ast::Expr::IfExpr(site)));
create_hint!(ty, format!("{}_keyword", token.text()))
}
T![fn] => {
let module = match ast::FnPtrType::cast(parent) {
// treat fn keyword inside function pointer type as primitive
Some(_) => format!("prim_{}", token.text()),
None => format!("{}_keyword", token.text()),
};
KeywordHint::new(token.text().to_string(), module)
}
kind if kind.is_keyword() => {
KeywordHint::new(token.text().to_string(), format!("{}_keyword", token.text()))
}
_ => panic!("{} was assumed to be a keyword, but it wasn't", token),
}
}