remove old contributing

This commit is contained in:
Aleksey Kladov 2019-03-20 15:34:09 +03:00
parent ac6749d18c
commit 1ad322236d
2 changed files with 6 additions and 18 deletions

View file

@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
The project is in its early stages: contributions are welcome and would be
**very** helpful, but the project is not _yet_ optimized for contribution.
Moreover, it is doubly experimental, so there's no guarantee that any work here
would reach production.
To get an idea of how rust-analyzer works, take a look at the [ARCHITECTURE.md](./ARCHITECTURE.md)
document.
Useful labels on the issue tracker:
* [E-mentor](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-mentor)
issues have links to the code in question and tests,
* [E-easy](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-easy),
[E-medium](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-medium),
[E-hard](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-hard),
labels are *estimates* for how hard would be to write a fix.
There's no formal PR check list: everything that passes CI (we use [bors](https://bors.tech/)) is valid,
but it's a good idea to write nice commit messages, test code thoroughly, maintain consistent style, etc.

View file

@ -35,3 +35,9 @@ https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0
* [E-fun](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-fun)
is for cool, but probably hard stuff.
# CI
We use Travis for CI. Most of the things, including formatting, are checked by
`cargo test` so, if `cargo test` passes locally, that's a good sign that CI will
be green as well. We use bors-ng to enforce the [not rocket
science](https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/1597.html) rule.