Devyn Cairns 6795ad7e33 Make custom value type handling more consistent (#12230) ... [Context on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/855947301380947968/1219425984990806207) # Description - Rename `CustomValue::value_string()` to `type_name()` to reflect its usage better. - Change print behavior to always call `to_base_value()` first, to give the custom value better control over the output. - Change `describe --detailed` to show the type name as the subtype, rather than trying to describe the base value. - Change custom `Type` to use `type_name()` rather than `typetag_name()` to make things like `PluginCustomValue` more transparent One question: should `describe --detailed` still include a description of the base value somewhere? I'm torn on it, it seems possibly useful for some things (maybe sqlite databases?), but having `describe -d` not include the custom type name anywhere felt weird. Another option would be to add another method to `CustomValue` for info to be displayed in `describe`, so that it can be more type-specific? # User-Facing Changes Everything above has implications for printing and `describe` on custom values # Tests + Formatting - 🟢 `toolkit fmt` - 🟢 `toolkit clippy` - 🟢 `toolkit test` - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`		2024-03-19 11:09:59 +01:00
..
dataframe	Make custom value type handling more consistent (#12230)	2024-03-19 11:09:59 +01:00
lib.rs	Put heavy dataframe dependencies behind feature flag (#9971)	2023-08-09 22:36:09 -07:00