# Description
we talked about this before in some meetings so i thought, why not?
the hope is that these constants do not require Rust code to be
implemented and that this move will make the Rust source base a bit
smaller 🤞
# User-Facing Changes
mathematical constants (e, pi, tau, phi and gamma) are now in `std math`
rather than `math`
## what can be done
```nushell
> use std; $std.math
> use std math; $math
> use std *; $math
```
will all give
```
╭───────┬────────────────────╮
│ GAMMA │ 0.5772156649015329 │
│ E │ 2.718281828459045 │
│ PI │ 3.141592653589793 │
│ TAU │ 6.283185307179586 │
│ PHI │ 1.618033988749895 │
╰───────┴────────────────────╯
```
and the following will work too
```nushell
> use std math E; $E
2.718281828459045
```
```nushell
> use std math *; $GAMMA
0.5772156649015329
```
## what can NOT be done
looks like every export works fine now 😌
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
# Description
With the current typechecking logic this property has no effect.
It was only used in the example testing, and provided some indication of
this vectorizing property.
With #9742 all commands that previously declared it have explicit list
signatures. If we want to get it back in the future we can reconstruct
it from the signature.
Simplifies the example testing a bit.
# User-Facing Changes
Causes a breaking change for plugins that previously declared it. While
this causes a compile fail, this was already broken by our more
stringent type checking.
This will be a good reminder for plugin authors to update their
signature as well to reflect the more stringent type checking.
The following math commands are being moved to nu-cmd-extra
* e (euler)
* exp
* ln
This should conclude moving the extra math commands as discussed in
yesterday's
core team meeting...
The remaining math commands will stay in nu-command (for now)....
The following math commands are being moved to nu-cmd-extra
* cos
* cosh
* egamma
* phi
* pi
* sin
* sinh
* tan
* tanh
* tau
For now I think we have most of the obvious commands moved over based on
@sholderbach this should cover moving the "high school" commands..
>>Yeah I think this rough separation into "high school" math in extra
and "middle school"/"programmer" math in the core makes a ton of sense.
And to reference the @fdncred list from
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9647#issuecomment-1629498812
requires
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9455
# ⚙️ Description
in this PR i move the commands we've all agreed, in the core team, to
move out of the core Nushell to the `extra` feature.
> **Warning**
> in the first commits here, i've
> - moved the implementations to `nu-cmd-extra`
> - removed the declaration of all the commands below from `nu-command`
> - made sure the commands were not available anymore with `cargo run --
-n`
## the list of commands to move
with the current command table downloaded as `commands.csv`, i've run
```bash
let commands = (
open commands.csv
| where is_plugin == "FALSE" and category != "deprecated"
| select name category "approv. %"
| rename name category approval
| insert treated {|it| (
($it.approval == 100) or # all the core team agreed on them
($it.name | str starts-with "bits") or # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9241
($it.name | str starts-with "dfr") # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9327
)}
)
```
to preprocess them and then
```bash
$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)}
```
to get all untreated commands with no approval, which gives
```
╭────┬───────────────┬─────────┬─────────────┬──────────╮
│ # │ name │ treated │ category │ approval │
├────┼───────────────┼─────────┼─────────────┼──────────┤
│ 0 │ fmt │ false │ conversions │ 0 │
│ 1 │ each while │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 2 │ roll │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 3 │ roll down │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 4 │ roll left │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 5 │ roll right │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 6 │ roll up │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 7 │ rotate │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 8 │ update cells │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 9 │ decode hex │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 10 │ encode hex │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 11 │ from url │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 12 │ to html │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 13 │ ansi gradient │ false │ platform │ 0 │
│ 14 │ ansi link │ false │ platform │ 0 │
│ 15 │ format │ false │ strings │ 0 │
╰────┴───────────────┴─────────┴─────────────┴──────────╯
```
# 🖌️ User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# 🧪 Tests + Formatting
- ⚫ `toolkit fmt`
- ⚫ `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# 📖 After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# 🔍 For reviewers
```bash
$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)} | each {|command|
try {
help $command.name | ignore
} catch {|e|
$"($command.name): ($e.msg)"
}
}
```
should give no output in `cargo run --features extra -- -n` and a table
with 16 lines in `cargo run -- -n`
This PR reverts https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9391
We try not to revert PRs like this, though after discussion with the
Nushell team, we decided to revert this one.
The main reason is that Nushell, as a codebase, isn't ready for these
kinds of optimisations. It's in the part of the development cycle where
our main focus should be on improving the algorithms inside of Nushell
itself. Once we have matured our algorithms, then we can look for
opportunities to switch out technologies we're using for alternate
forms.
Much of Nushell still has lots of opportunities for tuning the codebase,
paying down technical debt, and making the codebase generally cleaner
and more robust. This should be the focus. Performance improvements
should flow out of that work.
Said another, optimisation that isn't part of tuning the codebase is
premature at this stage. We need to focus on doing the hard work of
making the engine, parser, etc better.
# User-Facing Changes
Reverts the HashMap -> ahash change.
cc @FilipAndersson245
# Description
see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9390
using `ahash` instead of the default hasher. this will not affect
compile time as we where already building `ahash`.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
I wanted to get the infrastructure in place for starters for our
*nu-cmd-extra* crate...
The plan is to put inside here the following commands...
* bits
* bytes
* math
I thought it would be easier to do one at a time as well as get the
nu-cmd-extra crate out there on crates.io
for this upcoming release...
Once this lands the infrastructure will be in place to move over the
other noted commands for now...
And then add other stuff we do NOT want to be in 1.0.
