# Description
Adds a new keyword, `plugin use`. Unlike `register`, this merely loads
the signatures from the plugin cache file. The file is configurable with
the `--plugin-config` option either to `nu` or to `plugin use` itself,
just like the other `plugin` family of commands. At the REPL, one might
do this to replace `register`:
```nushell
> plugin add ~/.cargo/bin/nu_plugin_foo
> plugin use foo
```
This will not work in a script, because `plugin use` is a keyword and
`plugin add` does not evaluate at parse time (intentionally). This means
we no longer run random binaries during parse.
The `--plugins` option has been added to allow running `nu` with certain
plugins in one step. This is used especially for the `nu_with_plugins!`
test macro, but I'd imagine is generally useful. The only weird quirk is
that it has to be a list, and we don't really do this for any of our
other CLI args at the moment.
`register` now prints a deprecation parse warning.
This should fix#11923, as we now have a complete alternative to
`register`.
# User-Facing Changes
- Add `plugin use` command
- Deprecate `register`
- Add `--plugins` option to `nu` to replace a common use of `register`
# Tests + Formatting
I think I've tested it thoroughly enough and every existing test passes.
Testing nu CLI options and alternate config files is a little hairy and
I wish there were some more generic helpers for this, so this will go on
my TODO list for refactoring.
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
- [ ] Update plugins sections of book
- [ ] Release notes
# Description
Pretty much all operations/commands in Nushell assume that the column
names/keys in a record and thus also in a table (which consists of a
list of records) are unique.
Access through a string-like cell path should refer to a single column
or key/value pair and our output through `table` will only show the last
mention of a repeated column name.
```nu
[[a a]; [1 2]]
╭─#─┬─a─╮
│ 0 │ 2 │
╰───┴───╯
```
While the record parsing already either errors with the
`ShellError::ColumnDefinedTwice` or silently overwrites the first
occurence with the second occurence, the table literal syntax `[[header
columns]; [val1 val2]]` currently still allowed the creation of tables
(and internally records with more than one entry with the same name.
This is not only confusing, but also breaks some assumptions around how
we can efficiently perform operations or in the past lead to outright
bugs (e.g. #8431 fixed by #8446).
This PR proposes to make this an error.
After this change another hole which allowed the construction of records
with non-unique column names will be plugged.
## Parts
- Fix `SE::ColumnDefinedTwice` error code
- Remove previous tests permitting duplicate columns
- Deny duplicate column in table literal eval
- Deny duplicate column in const eval
- Deny duplicate column in `from nuon`
# User-Facing Changes
`[[a a]; [1 2]]` will now return an error:
```
Error: nu:🐚:column_defined_twice
× Record field or table column used twice
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ [[a a]; [1 2]]
· ┬ ┬
· │ ╰── field redefined here
· ╰── field first defined here
╰────
```
this may under rare circumstances block code from evaluating.
Furthermore this makes some NUON files invalid if they previously
contained tables with repeated column names.
# Tests + Formatting
Added tests for each of the different evaluation paths that materialize
tables.
# Description
The working directory doesn't have to be set for those tests (or would
be the default anyways). When appropriate also remove calls to the
`pipeline()` function. In most places kept the diff minimal and only
removed the superfluous part to not pollute the blame view. With simpler
tests also simplified things to make them more readable overall (this
included removal of the raw string literal).
Work for #8670
# Description
The two tests `to_nuon_from_nuon` and `to_nuon_from_nuon_string` were
taking multiple seconds and have since been superseded by more explicit
unit tests. Compared to the time cost for devs and CI they seldomly
returned explicit problems. One failure only popped up after months, as
a sampled failure (https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7564).
# User-Facing Changes
none
# Tests + Formatting
Fuzzing should move to a separate worker and be removed from the main
test suite.
See #8575 for experimentation around the impact on our test coverage.
Should close#7255.
# Description
**TL;DR**: this PR adds `--indent <int>`, `--tabs <int>` and `--raw` to
control a bit more the `string` output of `to nuon`, as done in `to
json` already, the goal being to promote the `NUON` format through easy
to read and formatted output `.nuon` files 😋
### outside of `crates/nu-command/src/formats/to/nuon.rs`
as the signature of `value_to_string` has changed, the single call to it
outside of its module definition has been changed to use default values
=> `value_to_string(&value, Span::unknown(), 0, &None)` in
`crates/nu-command/src/filters/uniq.rs`
### changes to `ToNuon` in `crates/nu-command/src/formats/to/nuon.rs`
- the signature now features `--raw`, `--indent <int>` and `--tabs
<int>`
- the structure of the `run` method is inspired from the one in `to
json`
- we get the values of the arguments
- we convert the input to a usable `Value`
- depending on whether the user raised `--raw`, `--indent` or `--tabs`,
we call the conversion to `string` with different values of the
indentation, starting at depth 0
- finally, we return `Ok` or a `ShellError::CantConvert` depending on
the conversion result
- some tool functions
- `get_true_indentation` gives the full indentation => `indent` repeated
`depth` times
- `get_true_separators` gives the line and field separators => a `("\n",
"")` when using some formatting or `("", " ")` when converting as pure
string on a single line
the meat of `nuon.rs` is now the `value_to_string` recursive function:
- takes the depth and the indent string
- adds correct newlines, space separators and indentation to the output
- calls itself with the same indent string but `depth + 1` to increase
the indentation by one level
- i used the `nl`, `idt`, `idt_po` (**i**n**d**en**t** **p**lus **o**ne)
and `idt_pt` (**i**n**d**en**t** **p**lus **t**wo) to make the
`format!`s easier to read
# User-Facing Changes
users can now
- control the amount and nature of NUON string output indentation with
- `--indent <number of " " per level>`
- `--tabs <number of "\t" per level>`
- use the previous behaviour of `to nuon` with the `--raw` option
- have new examples with `help to nuon`
> **Note**
> the priority order of the options is the following
> 1. `--raw`
> 2. `--tabs`
> 3. `--indent`
>
> the default is `--indent 2`
# Tests + Formatting
### new tests
- tests involving the string output of `to nuon`, i.e. tests not of the
form `... | to nuon | from nuon ...`, now use the `to nuon --raw`
command => this is the smallest change to have the tests pass, as the
new `to nuon --raw` is equivalent to the old `to nuon`
- in `crates/nu-command/src/formats/to/nuon.rs`, the previous example
has been replaced with three examples
- `[1 2 3] | to nuon` to show the default behaviour
- `[1 2 3] | to nuon --raw` to show the not-formatted output
- a more complex example with `{date: 2000-01-01, data: [1 [2 3] 4.56]}
| to nuon`
- the result values have been defined and the `examples` tests pass
### dev
- 🟢 `cargo fmt --all`
- 🟢 `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect`
- 🟢 `cargo test --workspace` ~~passes but without
`to_nuon_errs_on_closure`~~ fixed in
0b4fad7eff
# After Submitting
the `to nuon` page would have to be regenerated at some point due to the
new tests
# Description
While working on #8210 I noticed that we did not explicitly check a
number of `Value` variants for proper serialization and deserialization.
- Test filesize in `to/from nuon`
- Test duration in `from/to nuon`
- Test datetime in `from/to nuon`
- Test graceful failure of closure in `to nuon`
# User-Facing Changes
(-)
# Tests + Formatting
All about them tests
# Description
The code to generate the nuon format supports writing range literals,
which obviates the need to expand the range as added in #8047
# User-Facing Changes
`to nuon` will still output ranges as literals
# Tests + Formatting
- Add test for `to nuon` range output
- Add `from nuon` test for range
# Description
Lint: `clippy::uninlined_format_args`
More readable in most situations.
(May be slightly confusing for modifier format strings
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-parameters)
Alternative to #7865
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Tests + Formatting
(Ran `cargo +stable clippy --fix --workspace -- -A clippy::all -D
clippy::uninlined_format_args` to achieve this. Depends on Rust `1.67`)
# Description
Fixes#5996
Just found a relative easy way to fix the issue
# User-Facing Changes
```
❯ open $nu.plugin-path | from nuon
Error:
× error when loading nuon text
╭─[entry #36:1:1]
1 │ open $nu.plugin-path | from nuon
· ────┬────
· ╰── could not load nuon text
╰────
Error:
× Error when loading
❯ open $nu.config-path | from nuon
Error:
× error when loading nuon text
╭─[entry #37:1:1]
1 │ open $nu.config-path | from nuon
· ────┬────
· ╰── could not load nuon text
╰────
Error:
× error when loading
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
`proptest` caught a failing test condition for `&&` as a literal string. It requires a quotation to be parsed correctly by current `from nuon`
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/actions/runs/3753242377/jobs/6376308675
The change in the parser that now returns an error was introduced by https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7241
This in theory doesn't have to be an error (it is a diagnostic for nushell code) but it is probably better safe than sorry to require quotation here.
- Add a test for `&&` in `to nuon` from proptest fail
- Fix `to nuon` generating invalid `&&` literal
- Add a test for `,` in `to nuon`/`from nuon` cycle
- Bonus: should already be properly quoted
* remove unnecessary FlatShape
* add proptest
* remove files that belonged in another PR
* more tests, more chars
* add exception for parser error unrelated ot PR
