close#9335
I am not sure whether the fix was better to be delived as a minor bump
but it is what is is.
Could you @fdncred test it somehow?
I did it by checking out back the the original commit before the PR
refered in the issue.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
This change introduces new `search_result` style supported in the color
config. The change also removes obsolete check for `config.ls_colors`
for computing the style. `config.ls_colors` has been removed last year,
so this removes the reference to the obsolete flag, along with a cleanup
that removes all the code that used to rely on ls_colors for
highlighting search results.
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
close? #8060
Quite a bit of refactoring took place.
I believe a few improvements to collapse/expand were made.
I've tried to track any performance regressions and seems like it is
fine.
I've noticed something different now with default configuration path or
something in this regard?
So I might missed something while testing because of this.
Requires some oversight.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
close#8033
So as I said they suppose to be there;
I've basically added a change of style if --collapse is used.
PS: I guess it's worth to add tests so hold on if you'll plan to merge
it.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Hi there,
The case which was presented must be addressed.
But I did not test it properly...
I'd encourage you to do so.
Take care.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
fix#7858
Once again we here 😞
~~I am thinking is there some files with not flat structure we could use
to test table -e?
I mean it is clear it was a while ago were we had to create at least
some tests.
Do you have anything in mind (or maybe commands which is consistent
across systems)?~~
Take care
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
I have changed `assert!(a == b)` calls to `assert_eq!(a, b)`, which give
better error messages. Similarly for `assert!(a != b)` and
`assert_ne!(a, b)`. Basically all instances were comparing primitives
(string slices or integers), so there is no loss of generality from
special-case macros,
I have also fixed a number of typos in comments, variable names, and a
few user-facing messages.
