close? #8060
Quite a bit of refactoring took place.
I believe a few improvements to collapse/expand were made.
I've tried to track any performance regressions and seems like it is
fine.
I've noticed something different now with default configuration path or
something in this regard?
So I might missed something while testing because of this.
Requires some oversight.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
> I'm not sure how i feel about that. I mean if there are a lot of
columns, it should probably have a max width so 1 column doesn't take
the entire width of your screen. Ideally it would work closely like
table worked before we migrated to tabled, as far as how column widths
were allocated.
I believe it still not completely matched.
*To be honest I am not against the #7446 approach.
The PR makes a switch between logics on a premise of `termwidth`.
So if `termwidth > 120` we start prioritizing amount of columns we can
show (We try to show as many columns as we can).
Otherwise we do what I've described in #7446 (We show the least columns
but with least truncation involvement).
In case it's OK,
I guess we could make the value configurable.
cc @fdncred
ref #7446
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
